re: Trump lost Pennsylvania Monday

Nah here’s what will happen...

If the election comes down to Pa... rnc will sue, and it’ll go to the Supreme Court again, but this time ACB will be there and it’ll be rules only ballots in by 11/3 will count

I, too, was initially scared at the possibility, but to pull off massive fraud like that is much harder than it sounds.

First, the list of names have to be verified as having not voted this year (and not dead) which won't be known until after polls close. Time consuming.
2nd, the ballot has to be filled out and signed with that person's name. Time consuming.
3rd, the post-mark has to be skillfully/credibly imperfect. Time-consuming.
4th, there will be poll watchers to verify & convince of fraud-less activity. Otherwise, the cabal of ballot-makers & ballot-counters could just make up numbers.
5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.

Is it possible? yes. Improbable? most likely.

quote:

---

4th, there will be poll watchers to verify

---

Verify WHAT?

The Dims just need a list of those who didn't vote. The fraudulent ballots will come from that lists. There's no way to show or verify that the people on the voter rolls who didn't vote at the precinct on November 3rd didn't send in their ballots on November 3rd, 4th, 5th or 6th.

quote:

---

5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.

---

This will be coordinated and will happen all over the state at heavy Dim precincts.

WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE DIMS TOOK THIS ALL THE WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT?

Do you really think that they just want to make sure that "every ballot is counted" -- whether it be Republican or Democrat?

Do you really believe that Dims are against Voter I.D. because they believe it's racist? If so, you must believe like the Dims that blacks are too stupid, lazy and ignorant to figure out the simple task of getting a state issued I.D. card -- something that they need to get through life with.

Massive f*cking Voter Fraud is what the Dims do. Anyone over the age of 18 should already realize this.

quote:

---

Nah, relax. It's been stated they have to be post-dated by Nov 3rd.

---

quote:

---

I, too, was initially scared at the possibility, but to pull off massive fraud like that is much harder than it sounds.

---

You are badly underestimating what is afoot.

Think about it. Who would even consider submitting a proposal that NON-POSTMARKED ballots turning up days after the election be counted?
The answer ... someone who knows how to take advantage of such a system. All one needs to do is payoff a couple of postal workers running the route between a major post office and the mail-in vote repository.

It wouldn't even put the mailman in much jeopardy. Parties would identify an address for package delivery along the route. Mailman leaves truck to deliver the package. Democrat thug slips a 3ft stack of ballots in the truck while the mailman is doing the delivery.

Insofar as postmark requirements, creating an imitation postmark is incredibly simple ( LINK). The extraordinarily lax standards of "illegible or nonexistent postmarks" means mail with a simple computer generated counterfeit pm would easily pass muster.

Do y’all think Roberts is compromised or just part of the swamp himself? Mixture of both?

quote:

---

, too, was initially scared at the possibility, but to pull off massive fraud like that is much harder than it sounds.

First, the list of names have to be verified as having not voted this year (and not dead) which won't be known until after polls close. Time consuming.
2nd, the ballot has to be filled out and signed with that person's name. Time consuming.
3rd, the post-mark has to be skillfully/credibly imperfect. Time-consuming.
4th, there will be poll watchers to verify & convince of fraud-less activity. Otherwise, the cabal of ballot-makers & ballot-counters could just make up numbers.
5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.

Is it possible? yes. Improbable? most likely.

---

All of this assumes that the counters are acting with integrity. History shows that in Dim heavy districts this is not the case.

quote:

---

"We emphasize that voters utilizing the USPS must cast their ballots prior to 8:00 p.m. on
Election Day, like all voters, including those utilizing drop boxes, as set forth supra. We
refuse, however, to disenfranchise voters for the lack or illegibility of a postmark resulting
from the USPS processing system, which is undeniably outside the control of the
individual voter." Page 37 of the link..

---

It's funny how not taking up a case to not make a judicial ruling is effectively a ruling.

quote:

---

Let's say that ACB is sworn in on October 27th.

Can the Republicans file a Motion for Reconsideration so that ACB can have a vote prior to November 3?

---

pretty sure that would be no since roberts, as chief justice, is the one who decides what cases they will or wont hear and when