Started By
Message

Anyone else a naivete when it comes to interpreting art?

Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:12 am
Posted by Tarik One
Member since May 2016
2094 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:12 am
I simply cannot dissect it.

Show me a piece worth $600k and similar one worth $600 and I wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

I've taken a few classes and did ok and been to museums, but having the ability to let's say, "feel the emotions of the art/artist" is something I simply can't grasp.
This post was edited on 8/12/20 at 10:19 am
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
27558 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:13 am to
That is due to the fact that you're uncultured swine.
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32733 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:14 am to
It's time for America's favorite game!

Famous Artist or Kindergartner!!!!!
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:14 am to



I mean what is there to dissect in this classic?
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:15 am to
quote:

That is due to the fact that you're uncultured swine.



and he can't spell.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29336 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:15 am to
There’s nothing to dissect with most modern art. The difference between the $600k and the $600 piece is name recognition and how much they can be about it.
Posted by JetsetNuggs
Member since Jun 2014
14089 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:16 am to
I'm usually Cameron when it comes to interpreting art

This post was edited on 8/12/20 at 10:18 am
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
66147 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:16 am to
I had more trouble with Trixie....

Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98554 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:17 am to
You know that famous Jackson Pollack that's nothing but paint splatters? Seemingly anybody could do it, but if I tried it it would come out looking like a mess of splattered paint. There's something intangible about good art. You may not know what it is but you can tell.

This doesn't apply to all art of course. Some of it is just crap that the avante garde arent willing to admit is crap.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
19361 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:20 am to
I don't understand most of it either. I know what I like. I like some things that others hate. Then there are pieces that everyone loves and I just look at it and think it's ugly and tacky.

I'll never understand how some of the shite ends up being valued as much as it is when it is just horrible.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
151019 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:21 am to
I'm with you, OP. Although I will say that what people find so great about art is one reason I don't care for it that much. If I have to stare at something forever and try to figure out what the artist was "trying to represent" or what it means to me, I lost interest usually.

Not to mention that a lot of times I honestly feel like "art" is a complete sham and people are just pushing boundaries of how stupid society is. Like the dude who taped the banana on the wall at that art show and then it sold for like six figures. It's also shown in that Banksy documentary too. People are stupid, and art is one arena where they will pay top dollar to show how stupid they are because something is perceived as cool or trendy.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124841 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:22 am to
Naïveté isn’t something you can be.

You mean naive?
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78182 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:22 am to
quote:

If I have to stare at something forever and try to figure out what the artist was "trying to represent" or what it means to me, I lost interest usually.




Spot on.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Show me a piece worth $600k and similar one worth $600 and I wouldn't be able to tell the difference.


I almost posted two pictures. Asking if you could tell the difference.

One of a sexy Asian woman in a bikini to where you can tell she is a woman.

And the other would have been an Asian ladyboy with an obvious package bulge.

I didn't want to search for that pic though so I'm just telling you about it.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
18418 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:24 am to
That's because a lot of art, especially in 2020, is absolute horse shite. Anyone who pretends that smeared and splattered paint is some kind of next level meaningful thing is just not telling the emperor about his new clothes.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37669 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:25 am to
Modern art. I can tell what good classical art is, but modern/abstract art I just cannot get.

Except for kinetic sculptures/mobiles. Those are neat
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7907 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Show me a piece worth $600k and similar one worth $600 and I wouldn't be able to tell the difference.


Nobody can. It's pure marketing.
Posted by Slagathor
Makin' jokes about your teeny tiny
Member since Jul 2007
37927 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:27 am to
buy what appeals to you


but always say, "there's truth to this piece, but no logic"
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
49041 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:28 am to
I can't really appreciate most modern art.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
135178 posts
Posted on 8/12/20 at 10:28 am to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram