- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Seems one party roundly supports mail in voting and one party opposes
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:11 am
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:11 am
Is there a philosophically innocuous reason for this dichotomy?
If so tell me what it would be?
If so tell me what it would be?
27
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:12 am to Y.A. Tittle
The left wants more opportunity for voter fraud couched in the auspices of social justice and safety. The right simply wants to limit opportunities for voter fraud.
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:12 am to Y.A. Tittle
The philosophy is Orange Man Bad.
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:13 am to Y.A. Tittle
One party has a lot of voters who typically prefer to do things for themselves, another party has a lot of voters who like to have the government do things for them. Why would it be any different for voting?
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:16 am to Y.A. Tittle
Democrats do not now or will they every want fair elections.
Illegals voting, felons voting, no voter ID, motor voter....
The bottom line: If Democrats are for it, a fair electoral process demands we should be against it.
Illegals voting, felons voting, no voter ID, motor voter....
The bottom line: If Democrats are for it, a fair electoral process demands we should be against it.
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:18 am to Y.A. Tittle
I emailed my rep and pretty much begged him to vote against any aid package that includes mail in voting -- issue is will they even know if it's in there or not??
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:20 am to Y.A. Tittle
The same party that wants mail in voting is against voter id. Think about that for a minute.
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:21 am to Y.A. Tittle
This is the problem.
Democrats are characterizing election reform as just "mail in voting".
We already have mail in voting.
We really don't know the exact language they plan to pass.
But we can assume that it is pretty close to the language in California law that allows not only mail in voting, but same day registration, ballot harvesting and two weeks after election day dead line.
Democrats are characterizing election reform as just "mail in voting".
We already have mail in voting.
We really don't know the exact language they plan to pass.
But we can assume that it is pretty close to the language in California law that allows not only mail in voting, but same day registration, ballot harvesting and two weeks after election day dead line.
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:23 am to Y.A. Tittle
One party supports voter ID and one party opposes.
Can anyone see a trend?
Can anyone see a trend?
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:25 am to Y.A. Tittle
one side has a larger population of people who don't care about voting, individually
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:26 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:Been wondering the same thing
Is there a philosophically innocuous reason for this dichotomy?
Posted on 4/23/20 at 11:30 am to Y.A. Tittle
One party is compassionate and wants to save the USPS and the other party is deranged and wants it to collapse?
That’s all I got ...
That’s all I got ...
Posted on 4/23/20 at 12:20 pm to Y.A. Tittle
One party relies on the votes of a massive number of dumbasses, who are too ignorant to begin to understand what's in their own best interests. It is much easier to just collect their paperwork and mail in their votes than it is to wake them up, figure out which precinct they vote in, and haul their useless asses to the polls.
Early voting accomplishes the same objectives for that party, but mail-in voting allows them to frick the system right on up until election day.
Early voting accomplishes the same objectives for that party, but mail-in voting allows them to frick the system right on up until election day.
Posted on 4/23/20 at 12:25 pm to Y.A. Tittle
2018 California and "ballot harvesting"
Posted on 4/23/20 at 12:31 pm to Y.A. Tittle
They saw how well it worked in Orange County so they want to make it work in the big leagues
Posted on 4/23/20 at 1:03 pm to Y.A. Tittle
The Left is more concerned about assuring that every citizen can exercise the franchise, and the Right is more concerned about potential fraud arising from too-lax standards.
I doubt that anyone really debates these truisms.
The only real difference is that each side attributes ill motives to the other, while draping itself in a mantle of righteousness. Further, each tends to overstate the valid, underlying basis for its position and to minimize the valid, underlying concerns of the other side.
I doubt that anyone really debates these truisms.
The only real difference is that each side attributes ill motives to the other, while draping itself in a mantle of righteousness. Further, each tends to overstate the valid, underlying basis for its position and to minimize the valid, underlying concerns of the other side.
This post was edited on 4/23/20 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 4/23/20 at 1:07 pm to Y.A. Tittle
if everyone votes dems win.
gop strategy is to shorten voting windows and have few polling places in heavy dem areas.
theres nothing else going on.
if mail in is allowed voting will top 85%.
in all general elections rich people vote 85%.
poor, 50%.
that changes if you dont have to wait on line after working and making dinner.
gop strategy is to shorten voting windows and have few polling places in heavy dem areas.
theres nothing else going on.
if mail in is allowed voting will top 85%.
in all general elections rich people vote 85%.
poor, 50%.
that changes if you dont have to wait on line after working and making dinner.
Posted on 4/23/20 at 1:18 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Same reason the left wants you to have an ID for everything but voting:
They want to cheat.
End. Of. Story.
They want to cheat.
End. Of. Story.
Posted on 4/23/20 at 1:26 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Is there a philosophically innocuous reason for this dichotomy?
one party wants to be able to manufacture a winner in the election and will use non sequitur arguments to support it
Posted on 4/23/20 at 1:37 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Is there a philosophically innocuous reason for this dichotomy? If so tell me what it would be?
Don't you know?
1 party doesn't care who gets to vote. They don't care if they are non-citizens, dead people, or even made up people.
The other party believes in 1 person 1 vote, and that person must be a citizen, plus that person must be alive!
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News