Started By
Message

Can we franchise and trade Teddy in the offseason?

Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:33 am
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
33162 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:33 am
I keep seeing post on how we should have traded Teddy before the trade deadline. Am I missing something here? I understand franchising a player cost big $, but we should be able to trade him rather quickly.
Posted by Olric
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
1888 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:35 am to
Kind of a dick move to not let him choose where he plays, and will hurt us in public perception when pursuing other free agents.
Posted by King George
Member since Dec 2013
5385 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:37 am to
If you love something...let it go.

If it love you...it will come back.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64376 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:43 am to
Yeah we’re not doing that. We’ve become a decent destination for FAs. That would look like a total dick move for a guy who has been fantastic for the organization. The likely modest return you get likely in no way makes up for the PR hit.
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 9:45 am
Posted by Laaz2750
Los Angeles
Member since Aug 2008
8384 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 11:42 am to
We got 5 wins without Drew Brees.... that's what we got for Teddy Bridgewater.

A good trade.
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 11:43 am
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48952 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 11:43 am to
So just to clarify, you want to put Teddy on a 1-year $26,700,000 (estimated) contract for the 2020 season?



Side Note: Drew Brees will be making $21,300,000 next season
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 11:47 am
Posted by Rand AlThor
Member since Jan 2014
9472 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:00 pm to
We’ll likely get a 3rd round comp pick if he signs elsewhere anyway. Would be stupid to do this to him.
Posted by WMTigerFAN
Ouachita
Member since Feb 2005
4480 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:36 pm to
Absolutely the Saints could, if they can come up with the cap space. Not sure what that salary assignment would be, but it's one way to lock him down while negotiating a long term contract.

If you plan to deal him, that's a shitty thing to do to Bridgewater, unless you send him to the Pats.

Personally I'd let him hit FA, I don't see him as the heir apparent to Brees. I do think he'll draw some decent offers.
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
13298 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:03 pm to
Lol franchise a backup qb and pay him the average of the top 5 salaries at that position. Then what team will want him at that value? Brilliant idea. Texting loomis now.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30126 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 3:17 pm to
no, franchising him would cost more then just signing him
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37161 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 8:45 am to
Teddy probably played too well for him to come back to the Saints.

At some point, in order to close out Drew's cap hits, and pay our other players, we are going to need to get a QB on a rookie contract.
Posted by tigernnola
NOLA
Member since Sep 2016
3589 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 5:03 pm to
Teddy deserves more then that. He kept this team in the hunt, let him earn what’s due..... as long as its not in the NFC South :-)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram