Started By
Message

Is smoking really to blame for lung cancer?

Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:21 pm
Posted by Kujo
225-911-5736
Member since Dec 2015
6015 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:21 pm
quote:

In the United States, 20 percent of women who develop lung cancer have never smoked a single cigarette, and that number rises to 50 percent of women with lung cancer worldwide who are lifelong non-smokers. In fact, lung cancer in never-smokers is the 6th leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States.


quote:

HPV is now well-established as playing a role in most cases of cervical cancer, as well as many cases of vulvar cancer, penile cancer, roughly 95 percent of anal cancers, and 70 percent of oral cancers, especially those occurring in young, non-smoking women.




We've all heard , "if she smokes, she pokes", could lung cancer be from the poking and not the smoking.

quote:

Recently in the United States, and increased incidence of lung cancer in young women who have never smoked has been noted, and the potential causes are unknown. This, combined with the number of never smokers worldwide who develop disease, indicates that better research into the causes is greatly needed


Should Phillip Morris get their money back?

LINK
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37583 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:23 pm to
It’s because they’re fat as frick
Posted by Mr Clean
New Iberia
Member since Aug 2006
49506 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:24 pm to
I quit a few months ago and generally feel better now
Posted by tigerbutt
Deep South
Member since Jun 2006
24604 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:31 pm to
Well I wouldn’t say that smoking “prevents” cancer.
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
67952 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:32 pm to
Smoking isn't the only thing that could cause lung cancer but it contributes to it and other health issues at least. Respiratory issues are a big thing.

Have you seen all the chemicals in it?


I just don't know if you could ever pinpoint an exact cause of cancer. I imagine it doesn't help the cause. You have to factor in so many other variables.
This post was edited on 6/7/19 at 7:54 pm
Posted by WylieTiger
Member since Nov 2006
13028 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:34 pm to
It sure as frick causes bladder cancer.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:34 pm to
Cigarettes put fricking tar into your lungs. Explain to me how that is anything but bad.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71391 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:35 pm to
I don't think you're analyzing statistics correctly. Nonsmokers are accounting for a growing percentage of lung cancer cases because fewer people are smoking. So smoking-induced cancers are decreasing while other cancers are staying the same.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:38 pm to
I am 47 years old and no one I’ve known in my life has died of lung cancer.

I’ve also been in healthcare for 25 years and have seen very little lung cancer.

The risk of smoking is COPD, not lung cancer.
This post was edited on 6/7/19 at 7:39 pm
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
49035 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:40 pm to
Smoke if you got em?
Posted by Kujo
225-911-5736
Member since Dec 2015
6015 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:40 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/7/19 at 7:41 pm
Posted by Kujo
225-911-5736
Member since Dec 2015
6015 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

2nd hand smoke is pretty bad as well


I think you're missing the point. You are regurgitating anti-smoking propaganda.

quote:

Actress Marcia Cross (“Desperate Housewives”) and her doctors revealed Wednesday that they believe her battle with anal cancer was caused by the same human papillomavirus (HPV) that lead to her husband Tom Mahoney’s throat cancer


here is an example, husband and wife get cancer from HPV and "2nd hand hpv".

If it were lung cancer, they'd blame smoking and 2nd hand smoke. But being anal and throat, they blame hpv, and one bats an eye
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
67952 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

Here are a few of the chemicals in tobacco smoke and other places they are found:

Acetone—found in nail polish remover
Acetic acid—an ingredient in hair dye
Ammonia—a common household cleaner
Arsenic—used in rat poison
Benzene—found in rubber cement and gasoline
Butane—used in lighter fluid
Cadmium—active component in battery acid
Carbon monoxide—released in car exhaust fumes
Formaldehyde—embalming fluid
Hexamine—found in barbecue lighter fluid
Lead—used in batteries
Naphthalene—an ingredient in mothballs
Methanol—a main component in rocket fuel
Nicotine—used as an insecticide
Tar—material for paving roads
Toluene—used to manufacture paint


Posted by X82ndTiger
USA
Member since Sep 2004
2472 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:41 pm to
Who really knows. I’ve seen people that smoke and drink until they are in their 90’s and see people that are ‘healthy’ die at much younger ages that don’t smoke or drink.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:42 pm to
The American Cancer Society is sketchy as hell.

The risk of smoking that affects people every day and in real ways is COPD.

Lung cancer isn’t even close to the level.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84305 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:44 pm to
Jesus you make some terrible threads.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Have you seen all the chemicals in it?


How many chemicals do you breathe in from the plastic fumes offgassing from your car’s dash?

How many cigarettes would I have to smoke to equal the garbage in diesel exhaust I breathe in when a bus passes by?
Posted by Puffoluffagus
Savannah, GA
Member since Feb 2009
6108 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:48 pm to
Well less people are smoking now than use to smoke 30-40 years ago. So when the prevalence of a risk factor decreases, it's not surprising that the incidence of smoking related disease can also decrease...and can allow other risk factors to be seen or have a rise in incidence. So yeah it's still to blame for lung cancer, and many others.

....Also you forgot to leave this important point out of the article:
quote:

Whether the presence of HPV in lung cancer indicates causation (that HPV causes lung cancer) is another question. Just because there is a correlation between 2 things—in this case the presence of HPV and the development of lung cancer—says nothing about causation.



There's been lots of studies in the head and neck area that show HPV can often be ubiquitous. Just because you have a oral cavity cancer and HPV, doesn't mean that the oral cavity cancer was because of the HPV. Out of all the subsites of head and neck area, only in cancers of the oropharynx (tonsils and base of tongue) does HPV provide any change any prognosis for the disease, even though you can certainly find HPV in cancers of the voice box, oral tongue, gums, etc, but it doesn't seem to change the prognosis/cancer behave differently.
This post was edited on 6/7/19 at 7:52 pm
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68598 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:50 pm to
People that defend smoking in any way are trashy as frick
This post was edited on 6/7/19 at 7:51 pm
Posted by MullenBoys
In the minds of Ole Miss fans
Member since Apr 2014
13673 posts
Posted on 6/7/19 at 7:52 pm to
They say that cigarettes are addictive but I don’t believe that crap. I’ve been smoking 7 packs a day for 11 years and I’m not addicted.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram