Started By
Message

re: This climate change is crazy!

Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:21 am to
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23828 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:21 am to
Snowing heavily further south while in the 70s and 80s near the pole is certainly evidence of some kind of change.

But what gets me is, what is the motivation for right wingers to insist that everything is wonderful and that our limited ecosystem has an unlimited capacity to absorb pollution? This seems completely irrational.

Test your theory on a fish tank. Put a drop or two of oil in the fish tank every day. How long does it take for the chemistry to change to the point that it affects the health of the fish. Take notes. Report back.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119029 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Snowing heavily further south while in the 70s and 80s near the pole is certainly evidence of some kind of change.


When cold temperature air moves south from the north it is replaced by the warmer temperature air from the south. It's been happening this way in the northern hemisphere for million and millions of years.

quote:

But what gets me is, what is the motivation for right wingers to insist that everything is wonderful and that our limited ecosystem has an unlimited capacity to absorb pollution?


CO2 is not pollution. Incomplete combustion that produces other emission byproducts other than CO2 and water is pollution.

quote:

Test your theory on a fish tank. Put a drop or two of oil in the fish tank every day. How long does it take for the chemistry to change to the point that it affects the health of the fish. Take notes. Report back.


This model is 100% not analogous to the atmosphere.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 11:27 am
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21966 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 11:52 am to
quote:

But what gets me is, what is the motivation for right wingers to insist that everything is wonderful and that our limited ecosystem has an unlimited capacity to absorb pollution? This seems completely irrational.


CO2 isn’t pollution

We constantly get warned that CO2 is going to make us have run away global warming and turn us in to Venus

Earth Atmosphere 0.04% CO2
Venus Atmosphere 95.6% CO2
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 11:57 am
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

everything is wonderful


80 in Phoenix today.

I'd say that's pretty fricking wonderful.
Posted by Tiger985
Member since Nov 2006
6471 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

This seems completely irrational.


It's irrational to think politicians can control the weather with taxes.

We cannot change the weather for good or bad. We can adapt to the changes.

Human impact on climate is insignificant. Humans tend to think too much of themselves which is why you think we can do something about any possible change.

Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

But what gets me is, what is the motivation for right wingers to insist that everything is wonderful and that our limited ecosystem has an unlimited capacity to absorb pollution?

What in the blue frick are you on about now?

In what universe does "climate change denier" = "pollution denier"?

You idiot Lefties just can't help yourselves.

I guarantee you, every freaking person on this forum is against POLLUTION.

Nobody is for poisoning our air, soil, and water with toxins, and we are all opposed to anyone or anything that contributes to this.

This, however, has ZERO to fricking do with Anthropogenic Climate Change, you buffoon.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 12:24 pm
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13635 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

But what gets me is, what is the motivation for right wingers to insist that everything is wonderful and that our limited ecosystem has an unlimited capacity to absorb pollution?


But what gets me is, what is the motivation for liberals to insist that man is responsible for environmental changes?

It really weird but half of Alabama was part of the Gulf of Mexico millions of years ago. How did that happen without the evil big oil and republicans?
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9394 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Test your theory on a fish tank. Put a drop or two of oil in the fish tank every day. How long does it take for the chemistry to change to the point that it affects the health of the fish. Take notes. Report back.


What would be the proportional equivalent pollution to the earth's atmosphere, as compared to one or two drops of oil in a standard 20 gallon home fish tank? Take notes. Report back.
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
14280 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Snowing heavily further south while in the 70s and 80s near the pole is certainly evidence of some kind of change. But what gets me is, what is the motivation for right wingers to insist that everything is wonderful and that our limited ecosystem has an unlimited capacity to absorb pollution? This seems completely irrational. Test your theory on a fish tank. Put a drop or two of oil in the fish tank every day. How long does it take for the chemistry to change to the point that it affects the health of the fish. Take notes. Report back.


Ok, why was Mesopotamia the most fertile place in the world at one time and is now desert?

The answer isn’t because of F150’s driving around.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 7:15 pm to
What is the temperature supposed to be?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68425 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

Test your theory on a fish tank.
Holy shite you're an idiot.
Posted by flomacanes
Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
2760 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

limited ecosystem has an unlimited capacity to absorb pollution? This seems completely irrational.

Test your theory on a fish tank. Put a drop or two of oil in the fish tank every day


Here’s the problem with your test. If earth is the fish tank, then whatever you’re wanting to “pollute” the tank with has to come from inside the tank. We aren’t harvesting pollution from space and bringing it to earth. Whatever you’d like to call pollution ultimately came from the earth.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34367 posts
Posted on 5/21/19 at 9:45 pm to
quote:


But what gets me is, what is the motivation for right wingers to insist that everything is wonderful and that our limited ecosystem has an unlimited capacity to absorb pollution? This seems completely irrational


Irrational to me would be fining me for a piece of trash or two that fell out of my garbage can, while my neighbors aren't fined in spite of trash being tossed directly out of their windows and into the street.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 9:59 pm
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25579 posts
Posted on 5/22/19 at 1:58 am to
quote:

But what gets me is, what is the motivation for right wingers to insist that everything is wonderful and that our limited ecosystem has an unlimited capacity to absorb pollution? This seems completely irrational.


What gets me is liberals believe the earth is a fragile pussyfart and needs globalism to survive based on underpants gnome science.

Then again Neanderthal Conservatives also believe only women have vaginas.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31538 posts
Posted on 5/22/19 at 3:33 am to
quote:

right wingers


Whodat?
Posted by griswold
Member since Oct 2009
4043 posts
Posted on 5/22/19 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

pollution

CO2 is not pollution asswipe.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram