Started By
Message

re: 2019 Kentucky Derby

Posted on 5/5/19 at 8:40 am to
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 8:40 am to
LOL at the people claiming it killed Horse racing. In 2 weeks People will layb wagers in stacks of cash on the preakness, and watch it just like the derby.

Then, 3 weeks later they will watch the Belmont.


Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 8:44 am to
The reason it took so long for DQ, is that the stewards have to figure out where the #7 goes. He goes behind every horse that was interfered with, or was interfered with from other horses that had to check, etc.

And the DQ was the 100% Obvious call, they were lucky the other West owned horse didn't clip heels and lead to a big fall, with several horses going down and jockeys being trampled. That horse while having his head turned, stepped on outside of leaders leg, and one step inside them. Could of been one of nastiest spills in Derby, had that horse clipped leaders heels because of the shift.

90% that incident would of led to a spill and injuries to horses, jockies, and horse deaths, they got lucky, really lucky.

Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
30376 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:03 am to

Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
67017 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:20 am to
quote:

The issue is safety in an unsafe environment rain or shine. While the jock blamed the horse for veering out if it turns out he let him do so then the jockey will feel the heat at some point in the future. Athletes take short cuts in all sports to gain an uncompetitive advantage and racing is no different.

We will see.


I didn’t see it initially but I knew something was fricked up when the jockey blamed the horse for getting spooked when he was being interviewed by the lady on the horse. Too bad the horse can’t defend himself. Blaming the horse.

I’m not done with horse racing, but that reminded me of an NFL replay of what a catch used to be over the last couple of years. It just seemed hyper technical and led to an unsatisfying result.
This post was edited on 5/5/19 at 9:23 am
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:22 am to
I told the people i was with, that the horse broke out, he's tired, done. But he kept going(track aided). But the shift out and jockeys having to check, was obvious to everyone, including ray charles
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83583 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:25 am to
quote:

LOL at the people claiming it killed Horse racing. In 2 weeks People will layb wagers in stacks of cash on the preakness, and watch it just like the derby.

Then, 3 weeks later they will watch the Belmont.
The ratings for the Belmont will be shite.

Probably the Preakness as well.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:29 am to
Only retards who have no clue about horse racing and lost cash, possibly might not watch. Those who watch the triple crown races yearly will continue to watch.

Posted by lathoroughbred
Louisiana/Kentucky
Member since May 2008
8096 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:41 am to
I had a 1 dollar tri box 2,3,5,8,16 and 17 that ran me 120 bucks.

So I didn't have shite anyways lol.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:46 am to
quote:

I knew something was fricked up when the jockey blamed the horse for getting spooked


That stood out to me as well
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:49 am to
To be fair, there is little a 110lb jockey can do when a 1200lb horse wants to do something. They grab the reigns, and try to pull back.

I've seen a jockey standing up in reigns, pulling as hard as he can to slow a horse down, and the horse did what he wanted, jockey was just a passenger.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83583 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:52 am to
There’s no possibility of a triple crown winner.

That’s what casual fans tune in for.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:53 am to
quote:

There’s no possibility of a triple crown winner.

That’s what casual fans tune in for.


Go Away


Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83583 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 9:55 am to
Fine
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 10:02 am to
quote:

LOL at the people claiming it killed Horse racing.


Americans


The folks in Japan bet more on the Japan Cup than the Triple Crown and Breeders Cup combined.

Just another thing America is letting others grow at their expense.
Posted by Monkeyboy
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
765 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 10:27 am to
I don't think what happened in the Derby killed horse racing but it definitely doesn't help the sport. I actually think it's a fairly large blow to a sport that has been consistently losing the American public's interest for a while now, and as a horse racing fan I hate this.

Concerning the DQ in the race, I disagree with it (btw I didn't bet on Maximum Security). Yes, if you go by the letter of the law, I can see the argument that Maximum Security could have impeded the path of 2 of the horses, but this race isn't a claiming or allowance race with 7 or 8 horse. It's the freaking Kentucky Derby, where you can have up to 20 horses in it. You can't expect a clean race with that many horses (just look at all the bumping at the start of the race). If you want a clean safe race than lower the number of horses you put in it (which I don't want to see btw). Then you add the rain with this years race and that makes it even messier. Also add the fact that Maximum Security didn't do anything to impede Countrys House, the eventual winner's, path. The horses that complained were also rans. No horse was physically hurt. I just thought it was a DQ that lacked common sense. I would also be willing to bet that if Maximum Security was trained by Bob Baffert rather than Jason Servis that there would be no disqualification.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89618 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 10:35 am to
quote:

The reason it took so long for DQ, is that the stewards have to figure out where the #7 goes. He goes behind every horse that was interfered with, or was interfered with from other horses that had to check, etc. And the DQ was the 100% Obvious call, they were lucky the other West owned horse didn't clip heels and lead to a big fall, with several horses going down and jockeys being trampled


I've been watching horseracing for a long, long time. Since before I can remember. I haven't been to a lot of races live, but a handful of times. My old man LOVED the ponies and might gamble as much as $25 on a race.

(He also never left the racetrack down any money.)

Anyway, I've never seen anything like that in a major stakes race. When he kicked wide in the turn, I thought that was probably too early, but before I could process that I saw him slam into the horse on the rail. So, I said, "That could be 2 fouls right there." Even so, I thought the horse would finish first at that point.

And - full disclosure, I didn't watch it live - it was a replay (but I didn't know the results). Finally, watching the final turn from the front angle, they were all very lucky that the front 2 or 3 horses didn't go down, as that would have involve half a dozen horses and jockeys hitting the deck in that slop - at a minimum, could have gotten to 10 or more.

And that's the race literally everyone on Earth watches. Imagine multiple horses euthanized on the track and jockeys (plural) seriously injured or killed in front of over a billion people.

Do you want to kill your sport? Because that's how you kill your sport.

Posted by vodka
Member since Sep 2018
1843 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 10:52 am to
Japan has serious horse racing but they focus on turf. We can’t complete with their top class turf horses

Master fencer has a legit shot on a dry track
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Finally, watching the final turn from the front angle, they were all very lucky that the front 2 or 3 horses didn't go down, as that would have involve half a dozen horses and jockeys hitting the deck in that slop - at a minimum, could have gotten to 10 or more.


And that is why they had to DQ him.

I watched it and was amazed that the horse he cut off did not clip heels. That horse needs a fine dinner, all the fixings, because he saved several.

I've watched many,many,many horse races and bet on many, and that is a textbook DQ. But, stewards are afraid to make those decisions on big races, which is bullshite.

They did it in the BS classic i believe a couple years back, but didn't take down another horse who did the same in female race.

I give Stewards major stones for making the call, it was the right call.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Japan has serious horse racing but they focus on turf.


As does most of the rest of the world

quote:

We can’t complete with their top class turf horses


For generations Japan would buy 2nd and 3rd tier US bloodstock then lock their races to outsiders so they were never challenged. May appear to be better but may not in reality be so.

Lost in recent conversations is modern breeding sin the business. Thoroughbred horses were bred for speed and distance from the beginning until the late 90's. Now they are breeding for sprinters and this is not helping the breed. Also, we are running too much youth and all but killed the market for racing past the 3 year old campaign which will cause more problems than solve them.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89618 posts
Posted on 5/5/19 at 11:23 am to
quote:

I watched it and was amazed that the horse he cut off did not clip heels.


I don't think it was quite as close as with the cut off horse, but when he hit the horse on the rail and pulled ahead of him, they came close to getting tangled up, too. If they both weren't so *ahem* stout for 3-year old thoroughbreds, I think it would have happened.
This post was edited on 5/5/19 at 11:24 am
first pageprev pagePage 50 of 53Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram