Started By
Message

re: How can anyone defend the conversations from the tapes?

Posted on 3/27/19 at 10:30 pm to
Posted by DthVllyDud
Ameritopia
Member since Jan 2011
1365 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 10:30 pm to
Agree, Alleva is a spineless puppet. However, Alleva's lack of spine continually exposes that LSU is being run by a bunch of incompetent clowns.

My questions are rhetorical, based on the explicit language in Alleva's contract.

Point is, LSU doesn't have to wait until Alleva's contract runs out to find a new court jester.

Unfortunately, there is no one at LSU running the clown show that will do what needs to be done.
Posted by RightWingTiger
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2003
5349 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

 We know what was going on

And Everyone knew that:
1 Duke Lacrosse Team raped a hooker.
2 Trump colluded with Russia
3 HRC was Def gonna be POTUS
4 Jussie Smollett was attacked because he was Gay & Black
5 The Earth was Flat
6 If u have a Penis ur a Male and if u have a Vagina ur Joe Alleva???

Shall I continue destroying ur false assumptions that are based on Half arse info and Media Bias????
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119554 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

and this is why WW's lawyer is off base advising him not to speak with LSU.


Follow this logic.

Wade talks to Alleva with the NCAA rep.

Alleva reinstates Wade.

Dawkins defense teams calls Wade, Alleva, NCAA rep and all meeting attendees and they become deponents. The Dawkins team wants to know the contents of that meeting. What was discussed.

Now the FBI (specifically the SDNY) is interested in all deponent testimonials.

Now the SDNY will discredit all meeting deponents that could potentially help the defense.

A perjury trap is a really good way to discredit someone. And with perjury you can go to jail. Not a good look on a college coach’s CV.

Now do you see the danger?
Posted by Irish LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2014
2456 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 10:54 pm to
Follow this logic:
WW says "I paid Smart's family $10,000 to attend LSU"
WW, JA, NCAA official all say, "WW told us he paid the Smart family $10,000 to attend LSU."

OR.....

WW says "I did not pay Smart's family anything to attend LSU"
WW, JA, NCAA official all say, "WW told us he did not pay the Smart family anything to attend LSU."
Problem?
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
3532 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 10:58 pm to
Well I disagree... in almost 100% positive they have... classified or not
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
13269 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 11:13 pm to
Do we even know that WW actually said what YahooSports alledged? Dawkins attorneys must have leaked those "transcripts" to Yahoo. Their goal is to make college MBB to look as crooked as possible. That makes those "transcripts" suspect to me.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119554 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

Well I disagree... in almost 100% positive they have... classified or not



You have inside info?

Because media reports are the judge classified the court filings last year. LINK

And the FBI denied the NCAA’s request for documents last month:

quote:

A federal judge on Thursday denied the NCAA’s electronic request to obtain unreleased information gathered by the FBI for a college basketball corruption court case, according to a filing in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

LINK

You have updated info? And if the administration has the tapes and they are damning why haven’t they fired Wade yet?
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22426 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

Well I disagree... in almost 100% positive they have... classified or not



I am a 100% positive Ithat they have not heard the tapes. The FBI is not releasing any material pertaining to the case. I know this for a fact and if you say otherwise you are lying or talking out your arse
This post was edited on 3/27/19 at 11:38 pm
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
6484 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 11:37 pm to
I do t even know if tapes exist or if the leaked portion is accurate.
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 3/27/19 at 11:45 pm to
Says the hypocrite. Gtf
Posted by Cadello
Eunice
Member since Dec 2007
47820 posts
Posted on 3/28/19 at 12:00 am to
Innocent until proven guilty.
That’s how the law works.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124689 posts
Posted on 3/28/19 at 5:47 am to
quote:

All I said was ... something like that could be a real possibility.
quote:

I’m a teacher
Good Lord!
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
3532 posts
Posted on 3/28/19 at 6:16 am to
So you don't think LSU or the NCAA have people they can call to listen to that tape????... that's naive to think otherwise... Will didn't come to the meeting because his lawyer know the administration has heard the tape and he basically had no excuse to give them period...
Posted by MoneyShot
Member since Jan 2013
4319 posts
Posted on 3/28/19 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Will didn't come to the meeting because his lawyer know the administration has heard the tape and he basically had no excuse to give them period...


Speaking of naivety.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29339 posts
Posted on 3/28/19 at 6:45 am to
How many alters do you have Derek?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124689 posts
Posted on 3/28/19 at 6:54 am to
quote:

WW can speak to anyone about anything.
Again?
You are going there again?
Seriously?

So ONCE AGAIN, Will Wade could "speak to anyone about anything." It would be stupid to expose himself legally in that way. But he could do it. He could also climb to the top of Memorial Tower and jump, just to see how the landing would feel.
quote:

WW has no legal issues with the FBI/this federal court case.
We have discussed the concept of a perjury trap extensively. At this point, it is apparent you are either learning impaired, or just don't care about facts.
quote:

Wade put out a statement Friday essentially saying that when all the facts come out the story will look a lot different than it does now. Beyond that he’s not going to say any more until he testifies at that trial, and nobody really ought to ask him to – if Wade were to go into a room with Alleva, LSU president F. King Alexander and/or members of the university’s Board of Supervisors and discuss anything on those transcripts it’s a good bet he’ll subject all of them to being subpoenaed by Dawkins’ defense counsel as well, and at that point everybody could be in a perjury trap. Be careful what you ask for.
LINK


========

quote:

Is he worried that his comments to LSU/NCAA will make someone in a federal court case look more or less guilty of something?
Since you are either incapable of understanding how a perjury trap can render an innocent man guilty, or ignore the fact because it does not fit your narrative, let's talk about this in different terms.

Wade is threatened with subpoena by an adversarial (that means unfriendly) counsel.
With me so far?
The effort of that counsel will be to imply Wade did things including things he may not have done. He does not have Wade's interest at heart. If Wade telegraphed his testimonial responses for that unfriendly counsel, it would be akin to one football team giving the other its gameplan and playsheets weeks in advance of the game.
Got it?

Even if the obvious threat of legal entrapment is beyond you, perhaps you can understand the football analogy?
quote:

What is WW (and his lawyer) afraid of?
It is a question which has been answered for you many, many, many, many times.

Wade has not been dismissed. Why?
Perhaps you should ask what is LSU afraid of?

Smart, whose case is joined at the hip to Wade, is reinstated.
Perhaps you should ask why would LSU and the NCAA do that?
This post was edited on 3/28/19 at 7:26 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124689 posts
Posted on 3/28/19 at 6:57 am to
quote:

The administration is protecting the program.
By reinstating Smart?
How exactly does that work, kciDAtaE?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124689 posts
Posted on 3/28/19 at 7:02 am to
quote:

So you don't think LSU or the NCAA have people they can call to listen to that tape????... that's naive to think otherwise...
It is naive to think the FBI would not share evidence with outside parties?

You didn't lepdagod. You lepd a shark.
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
3532 posts
Posted on 3/28/19 at 7:32 am to
quote:

It is naive to think the FBI would not share evidence with outside parties?


You serious???

Of course these people have heard the tape... you think LSU or the NCAA doesn't have no one with the connections to get the tape...

The administration more than likely have been told by a insider Will on the wrong side here...

My question is this ... What exactly was the administration suppose to do???... Will the a-hole here plain and simple... shouldn't be on the phone with a known fixer... simple as that
Posted by TiegerTim
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2007
2987 posts
Posted on 3/28/19 at 7:38 am to
quote:

I’ve seen the offer referencing a scholarship?

so you agree the offer was referring to a scholarship?

Context. Have you heard the tapes? I ask how can someone “convict” without having all the info in context.
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15 16 17 ... 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram