- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Which 5 Supreme Court decisions do you want overturned?
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:09 pm
My list:
Roe v Wade
Planned Parenthood v Casey
NFIB v Sebelius
Edwards v. Aguillard
Turner v. Safley
Roe v Wade
Planned Parenthood v Casey
NFIB v Sebelius
Edwards v. Aguillard
Turner v. Safley
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 5:21 pm
24
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:11 pm to Parmen
Kramer v Kramer
Jean Claude v Damme
Jean Claude v Damme
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:13 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
None. Well, only the ones they decide to overturn really.
It's a pretty good system, it's not perfect, but it's pretty good. Has the potential to get "better" in the sense of it will stop getting worse or get slightly less worse under another Trump tenure.
We'll see.
It's a pretty good system, it's not perfect, but it's pretty good. Has the potential to get "better" in the sense of it will stop getting worse or get slightly less worse under another Trump tenure.
We'll see.
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:15 pm to Parmen
Wickard
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:16 pm to Parmen
Kelo v New London
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:17 pm to Parmen
Must I want them overturned or would it be OK to think they should have been decided differently? Considerations of stare decisis make the two analyses quite different.
I think that the last 100 years of Commerce Clause expansion was wrongly-decided, but that is WAY more than five cases.
I think that the last 100 years of Commerce Clause expansion was wrongly-decided, but that is WAY more than five cases.
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:19 pm to Parmen
Buck v Bell
Kelo v New London
NFIB v Sebelius
Kaley v US
Kelo v New London
NFIB v Sebelius
Kaley v US
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:20 pm to Bestbank Tiger
ETA - I know that's only four. A lot of the worst are going to come up multiple times.
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:20 pm to Parmen
Leser v Garnett
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:24 pm to Parmen
Kennedy V Louisiana
Kelo V New London
Buck v Bell
Citizens United v FEC
Smith v Maryland
Bennis v Michigan
Gonzales v Raich
Kelo V New London
Buck v Bell
Citizens United v FEC
Smith v Maryland
Bennis v Michigan
Gonzales v Raich
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:34 pm to Parmen
Wickard v Filburn
Kelo v New London
Wickard alone would be a fricking massive curtailing of federal power.
Kelo v New London
Wickard alone would be a fricking massive curtailing of federal power.
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:35 pm to Parmen
US v Miller
Texas v. White (1869)
Texas v. White (1869)
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:36 pm to Parmen
quote:
Edwards v. Aguillard
You think creationism should be taught in public schools?
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:37 pm to Parmen
Whichever one prevents us from rounding up teh gays
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:38 pm to Bard
quote:
Wickard alone would be a fricking massive curtailing of federal power.
This, that was pure BS that a man can't grow his own wheat, on his of land. What nonsense. The feds just want their beak wet. Criminals
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:41 pm to Parmen
Marbury vs Madison
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:42 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Gonzales v Raich
Notorious RBG in the majority. Slay queen! Yasss
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:45 pm to Parmen
Really surprised you didn't include Brown vs Board
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:47 pm to Parmen
Wickard
Sullivan
Sibelius
The last two spots I’ll reserve for the entire body of case law on the National Security State and the use of military force.
Sullivan
Sibelius
The last two spots I’ll reserve for the entire body of case law on the National Security State and the use of military force.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:49 pm to Bard
quote:These two, plus Griggs v Duke Power and Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
Wickard v Filburn
Kelo v New London
Can't think of a 5th one at the moment.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 12:50 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News