- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Wall and the Land it will take to build it.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:13 pm
How does the board feel about the possibility of the Govt talking peoples land through eminent domain. This to me is the issue that now one is talking about. It will hold up the wall for years in court. I am not a fan of eminent domain at all. Thoughts?
LINK
LINK
33
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:14 pm to hawkeye007
The federal gov't already owns that land/the land owners know they have to give the feds right away.
This is a stupid talking point
This is a stupid talking point
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:14 pm to hawkeye007
Not a big deal and most ranchers welcome it.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:15 pm to hawkeye007
If the land owner is totally again it, put the wall just north of his land
Everybody is happy
Everybody is happy
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:15 pm to hawkeye007
I dont understand how there wasnt an easement in place already.
I think the vast majority would want better security but I'm sure a vocal minority will oppose.
I think the vast majority would want better security but I'm sure a vocal minority will oppose.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:15 pm to hawkeye007
could be costly
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:15 pm to hawkeye007
What you do is you build the wall on the land you can, and when thousands of immigrants are being funneled onto their property they'll change their minds.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:16 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
How does the board feel about the possibility of the Govt talking peoples land through eminent domain. This to me is the issue that now one is talking about. It will hold up the wall for years in court. I am not a fan of eminent domain at all. Thoughts?
Pretty sure any land on the border is fedgov ROW. So while they may use it, if fedgov needs it for any reason, it must be cleared. Sort of like utility ROW's.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:16 pm to hawkeye007
Considering the gov't of supposed fiscal responsibility is shutting down the gov't because they can't spend enough, I'd say that the government (under Trump of course) can do whatever it wants and they'll fully support it.
In summary: GOP has abandoned their principles completely and stands only for what Trump tells them to stand for.
shame, shame, shame...
In summary: GOP has abandoned their principles completely and stands only for what Trump tells them to stand for.
shame, shame, shame...
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:16 pm to hawkeye007
adorable
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:16 pm to hawkeye007
It’s our ducking nations border. I am fine taking 1000 feet of it.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:16 pm to hawkeye007
Where are all the landowners who want to turn down a free wall on their property? Surely the left would be trotting them out if they existed?
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:16 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
could be costly
But not the illegals and the added strain on our education system, healthcare, and other welfare programs right?
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:17 pm to JoBoo
frick you are another idiot.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:17 pm to hawkeye007
I don't really get this as an "issue." Are a lot of people at risk of being denied seriously useful portions of their property by the government potentially commandeering via eminent domain the strip of it that constitutes the freaking border with Mexico? How so?
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:17 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
I am not a fan of eminent domain at all.
If there is EVER a reason for eminent domain to exist, this is it... It sucks, I have been through it but I was fairly compensated for the taking...
It will not hold up the wall either...
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:18 pm to hawkeye007
eminent domain lawsuits are the smaller worry...environmental impact, endangered species law suits, etc would tie this thing up for years.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:19 pm to JoBoo
quote:
Considering the gov't of supposed fiscal responsibility is shutting down the gov't because they can't spend enough, I'd say that the government (under Trump of course) can do whatever it wants and they'll fully support it.
In summary: GOP has abandoned their principles completely and stands only for what Trump tells them to stand for.
Trump has liberals so beat down they are turning into fiscal hawks.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:21 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
How does the board feel about the possibility of the Govt talking peoples land through eminent domain.
I think they should just move past landowners who don't want it and continue building where their property ends. That way their open areas will be the funnel point that drive all the illegal criminal aliens to their land.
That said, I would be surprised if there wasn't government easement on the line separating countries.
This post was edited on 1/10/19 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 1/10/19 at 2:21 pm to The Maj
quote:
If there is EVER a reason for eminent domain to exist, this is it..
Yeah this......
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News