- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Wall and the Land it will take to build it.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:26 pm to hawkeye007
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:26 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
How does the board feel about the possibility of the Govt talking peoples land through eminent domain. This to me is the issue that now one is talking about. It will hold up the wall for years in court. I am not a fan of eminent domain at all. Thoughts?
LINK
oh oh oh oh I am so excited!!!!
If it takes years we can destroy the country by then!!!!
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:27 pm to CoachChappy
quote:The government does own an easement on some parts of the border. On other parts of the border, it does not. This has been said several times on this thread.
It’s called an easement jackass and the govt already has it. Nice try though soiboi
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:28 pm to The Maj
quote:i totally understand how bills become law, but this is Donald Trump's government, not Nancy Pelosi's
So you don’t understand how bills become law either? How quaint...
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:28 pm to hawkeye007
I have not read through this thread so this may have been brought up. If you had land that bordered the Rio Grande river and had been running cattle on that land with access to the river for water you should be compensated for the loss of river access. If you had river access and the federal government fenced you off from the river how would that affect your overall land value?
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:28 pm to TOKEN
quote:
Read the details. It says most of the cases are about payout but not all of them. Now you are talking about a significantly longer right of way.
Which is why I asked you to name one case. So we could get the precise details.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:29 pm to hawkeye007
Wait, so the FED can grab all that land that they made into national parks, but to grab a strip, in order to regulate immigration is going to be tied up in court?
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:40 pm to AggieHank86
K thanks. So from $250 to $500 per acre would be fair market value so to speak... a lot more complicated to get to the exact figure but that is cheap land...
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:42 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
dont understand how there wasnt an easement in place already
There is 60 foot easement from El Paso west to San Diego.
From El Paso east to Brownsville the Rio Grande is the international boundary.
I am not aware of any easements along that stretch, other than the land already owned by the government like Big Bend NP.
Texas would be the tricky section having to negotiate with ranchers and the environmental challenges associated with the Rio Grande.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:43 pm to highcotton2
Already discussed but the government would or could be liable for reduced value or loss of use or they could offer money for drilling deep wells to provide water for cattle...
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:45 pm to IllegalPete
Negotiating with the ranchers in TX will get easier as the wall is built and illegals are funneled toward their unwalled property...
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:47 pm to The Maj
quote:Negotiation through the intentional creation of nuisance. Well, that’s one approach.
Negotiating with the ranchers in TX will get easier as the wall is built and illegals are funneled toward their unwalled property...
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:52 pm to AggieHank86
Look, I am not arguing against fair or even better than fair compensation for anyone that has property taken in this instance but you know there is going to be that one rancher that thins his land is worth 10k an acre...
If they don’t want to negotiate in good faith then build the wall where you can first...
If they don’t want to negotiate in good faith then build the wall where you can first...
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:57 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
my family ranched a little less than 300 sections on the border and adjacent to it for more than 30 years. Only a few miles were actually on the Rio Grande.
Nice to have someone knowledgeable about ranching on the Rio Grande here.
Is the Rio Grande used as a water source? I know in the Hatch and Mesilla Valleys of NM they use canals to irrigate crops. When you get down to the valley below El Paso they use wells. In fact in Ft Hancock which sits along the banks of the Rio Grande the land is idle because the groundwater is too salty and for whatever reason they can't/don't take water from the river.
There are hardly any ranches along the Rio Grande through NM. Not sure if that is because the land is more valuable for crops or some other reason.
Most ranches in AZ and NM rely on natural water sources that feed into the Rio Grande, Pecos, Gila, and Colorado rivers but not the primary rivers themselves. They also rely on wells/tanks.
Could you elaborate on how the Rio Grande is used by ranchers in Texas?
This is much more interesting to discuss than the typical slap fighting.
I would appreciate any insight you have.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 7:17 pm to IllegalPete
quote:Depends upon where on the border we are talking about.
Is the Rio Grande used as a water source? I know in the Hatch and Mesilla Valleys of NM they use canals to irrigate crops. When you get down to the valley below El Paso they use wells. In fact in Ft Hancock which sits along the banks of the Rio Grande the land is idle because the groundwater is too salty and for whatever reason they can't/don't take water from the river.
Once you get a few mile east of El Paso, the land gets REALLY rugged and useless for farming. For hundreds of miles (basically until you get well past Del Rio), it is only ranching. The ranches run right up to the river, and livestock (cattle and sheep mostly, but also goats) walk right up to the river and drink.
The topography is small mountains and BIG hills, with huge gullies and ravines running all through it. The gullies and ravines are FILLED with NASTY, sharp vegetation (mostly catclaw and mesquite). The grass (such as it is) grows mostly along the ridgelines. The land gets flatter as you move north, until you get some decent flat land ten or twenty miles in from the Rio.
When it DOES rain, the ravines and gullies become raging floods, because the soil is so rocky that almost nothing saturates into the soil. Most people use the larger dry river beds as roadways most of the year. All larger ranches have a bulldozer, because you are constantly fixing roads that were damaged by floodwaters. All that water flows eventually to the Rio Grande.
I THINK the situation is the same between Del Rio and and about Laredo, but a good bit flatter. Downriver (beginning maybe 100 miles down from Laredo) is the start of the "Valley," where intensive farming (including lots of citrus) starts to take over. I understand that they DO a lot of irrigation down there direct from the Rio, but I have no firsthand knowledge. We have never leased anything much further downriver than the Laredo area. Even that was almost 40 years ago, and I was quite young, so I am a big foggy on the details. (I do remember shooting javelina from a chopper).
Back to far West Texas, the Rio is certainly NOT the ONLY water source, but people tend to use it as the PRIMARY water source in pastures adjacent to the Rio ... because it is reliable. There are also windmills, which are not too deep usually. In drought, they often go dry.
Some people also set up rainwater cisterns, but not many.
Further into Texas from the river, there are not many continuous rivers/creeks and only a few natural springs. As such, you tend to see lots more windmills (often several per pasture) and even surface ponds. BTW, a "pasture" in far West Texas is often larger than an entire RANCH further east. Most of our pastures were 20 sections or larger.
Was that helpful?
Posted on 1/14/19 at 2:09 pm to AggieHank86
thanks for providing some real insight to this topic. k
Posted on 1/14/19 at 2:14 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Was that helpful?
Yes, thanks.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News