- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If proof can be found that accusations are false,
Posted on 9/23/18 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 9/23/18 at 8:51 pm
How big could the blowback be on the Dems? Seems like it would elicit an emotional, sympathetic response from suburban women who were about to remove the GOP from their majority position in the House because of muh feelings.
19
Posted on 9/23/18 at 8:52 pm to GeneralLee
It will all be forgotten by the morning news
Posted on 9/23/18 at 8:54 pm to GeneralLee
It's why none of these women have filed formal charges against Kavanaugh. Filing false charges are punishable by law.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 8:55 pm to GeneralLee
That was the deal, make unfounded accusations that cannot be proved unfounded. Pure genius.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 8:58 pm to GeneralLee
The blowback should occur when the accusers can produce no proof that the accusations happened, not the other way around.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 8:59 pm to GeneralLee
Remember when Harry Reid admitted to lying about Romney's tax returns?
Yeah...the blowback in that was incredible.
Yeah...the blowback in that was incredible.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:01 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
How big could the blowback be on the Dems?
If 2016-2018 has not already taught you that there will be absolutely no blow back for any Democrat blunder in the media, then you need to wake up.
However, even if the Media glosses over and tries to bury this, it is swaying alot of independent voters I have been talking to.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:01 pm to GeneralLee
Zero blowback. Most msm would drop the story then. They would immediately start pushing the new thing to be outraged about.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:01 pm to GeneralLee
This is why they purposefully set it up so that it can't be disproven.
No time given, no place given -- all the normal FACTS whereby someone could give a positive alibi -- EVEN APPROXIMATELY 36 F*CKING YEARS LATER -- were purposefully omitted with vague references.
They made sure that there was NO F*CKING POSSIBLE WAY Kav could "disprove" these lies.
No time given, no place given -- all the normal FACTS whereby someone could give a positive alibi -- EVEN APPROXIMATELY 36 F*CKING YEARS LATER -- were purposefully omitted with vague references.
They made sure that there was NO F*CKING POSSIBLE WAY Kav could "disprove" these lies.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:03 pm to GeneralLee
The media simply won’t cover it.
Just like when Dems got caught paying Trump accusers with campaign money. That should have been a huge scandal, but they ignored the story.
Just like when Dems got caught paying Trump accusers with campaign money. That should have been a huge scandal, but they ignored the story.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:04 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
How big could the blowback be on the Dems? S
zero blowback as usual
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:06 pm to GeneralLee
They started the conversation you heartless bastard.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:08 pm to GeneralLee
There would be so much new Muh Russia and Muh Racism coverage that it wouldn’t even get airtime.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:11 pm to GeneralLee
It's practically impossible to prove a negative.
That's why the burden of proof rests with the accuser. It is possible to prove that something occurred, while it is almost impossible to prove a thing did not occur. Especially when the accuser is offering no dates or places. frick this.
That's why the burden of proof rests with the accuser. It is possible to prove that something occurred, while it is almost impossible to prove a thing did not occur. Especially when the accuser is offering no dates or places. frick this.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:11 pm to GeneralLee
Hard to prove. You would have to filmed a negative and then they would riot.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:12 pm to GeneralLee
I think this is bad timing for the Dems as this will make midterms ugly for them. This is already motivating Conservatives that just a week ago weren't excited about the midterms. Not making this up. The polling is showing this.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:13 pm to GeneralLee
How are they going to prove them false?
I mean the bitch has made it basically impossible to give an alibi because it happened "in an undetermined place at an undetermined time with apparently, no actual witnesses".
You might as well try and prove big foot wasn't at the party. I mean. You know he wasn't. But PROVE it!
I mean the bitch has made it basically impossible to give an alibi because it happened "in an undetermined place at an undetermined time with apparently, no actual witnesses".
You might as well try and prove big foot wasn't at the party. I mean. You know he wasn't. But PROVE it!
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:14 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
If proof can be found that accusations are false
That's the point, it could never be found, especially with allies at Google, Facebook, the FBI, the Senate, etc.
This post was edited on 9/23/18 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:19 pm to GeneralLee
quote:They're too vague to be proven false. That’s intentional.
If proof can be found that accusations are false,
quote:zip nada zilch zero. Media won’t report it. And Democrat zealots won’t care.
How big could the blowback be on the Dems?
This post was edited on 9/23/18 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 9/23/18 at 9:39 pm to GeneralLee
These accusations are put forward in a way that they can neither be proved or disproved by any investigative party.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News