- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:42 am to AuburnTigers
Which is why the idiot OP cast such a wide net of "nothing at all".
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 11:43 am
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:42 am to VOR
I dont believe they did any more in this election than any in the past.
Ill even say they spent less effort on this election than they did in the last 75 years
Ill even say they spent less effort on this election than they did in the last 75 years
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:44 am to VOR
quote:
Who beleves Russia did nothing at all? by VOR
I was completely ready to say, "not I" because obviously Russia tries to frick with our elections but
quote:and I feel the need for clarity.
Who here believes that the entire hacking story
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 11:45 am
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:45 am to bamafan1001
I thought it was the BSA that got caught trying to hack into the Presidential election in Georgia. So who really did it?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:47 am to VOR
It may well be 100% true but there has been zero evidence provided beyond the Crowdstrike assessment. And Assange's assertion that the DNC emails came from an inside source seems far more credible than an unverifiable claim from Ukrainian separatists who have been caught before in baldfaced lies. There may possibly be classified intel tying this conclusively to Russia but none of us have seen it and in the current leakgeist altmosphere that makes it seem an extreme longshot.
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 11:51 am
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:51 am to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
They did something, but probably put the same effort into this election that they have every election for the last 100 years.
This.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:51 am to VOR
Aside from the "influence" campaign the IC reported on, what evidence--even insignificant do you have to think otherwise?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:53 am to VOR
With Putin being former KGB, it's hard to believe they haven't tried something.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:54 am to VOR
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:54 am to VOR
Present
Even if they did interfere to make Hillary lose, we should be thanking them
Even if they did interfere to make Hillary lose, we should be thanking them
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:54 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
quote:
beleves
Mother of God
GIVE ME a break. I'm recovering from a stroke here.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:55 am to VOR
quote:
Who here believes that the entire hacking
What do you people think they hacked ? Voting machines ?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:56 am to VOR
Here's what I believe. Actually, here is what I KNOW: Had HRC won the election, Russia's involvement or non-involvement in our election process would NEVER have been so much as a 1/8 page article on page 10 of the NYT or WAPO.
We would be in month 8 of "this historic President's administration", and the liberal media everywhere would be tugging in front of their TV's at every rhetorical bullshite empty meaningless statement she made while ignoring the Clinton Foundation, her influence and access pedaling, her health issues, and everything else wrong with the woman in lieu of 'This historical presidency'... in other words, they would have given her the Barry treatment, except for being female rather than black. Any and every word of criticism toward her would have been 'evidence of misogyny' just like any and all criticism of Barry was evidence of racism.
Whatever Russia may or may not have done to sway the election, it was a helluva LOT LESS than what the AMERICAN MAIN STREAM MEDIA did to put HRC in office.
So now we have 'meh Russians!' because the MSM's candidate lost.
We would be in month 8 of "this historic President's administration", and the liberal media everywhere would be tugging in front of their TV's at every rhetorical bullshite empty meaningless statement she made while ignoring the Clinton Foundation, her influence and access pedaling, her health issues, and everything else wrong with the woman in lieu of 'This historical presidency'... in other words, they would have given her the Barry treatment, except for being female rather than black. Any and every word of criticism toward her would have been 'evidence of misogyny' just like any and all criticism of Barry was evidence of racism.
Whatever Russia may or may not have done to sway the election, it was a helluva LOT LESS than what the AMERICAN MAIN STREAM MEDIA did to put HRC in office.
So now we have 'meh Russians!' because the MSM's candidate lost.
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:57 am to GumboPot
quote:
Russia tried to influence the election.
I've asked this question 3 times on this board. I've never gotten an answer. To anybody here:
Why did Putin want Trump to beat Hillary? What was his motive? Was he afraid Hillary would invade Russia and make them a US colony?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:57 am to AustinTigr
quote:Truth
Whatever Russia may or may not have done to sway the election, it was a helluva LOT LESS than what the AMERICAN MAIN STREAM MEDIA did to put HRC in office.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:57 am to VOR
If they did something,
it resulted in better informed voters.
it resulted in better informed voters.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:57 am to VOR
Unless it's proven they actually somehow manipulated the voting machines literally changing votes I don't care what they did. On that note, I would bet everything I own that they did not do that.
Fake news came from both sides during the campaign. So, why should I be mad if it's proven that the Russians had something to do with that? That would mean they're no better/no worse than the pieces of shite at occupy democrats or any of other blogs, etc. tossing out inaccurate info.
Fake news came from both sides during the campaign. So, why should I be mad if it's proven that the Russians had something to do with that? That would mean they're no better/no worse than the pieces of shite at occupy democrats or any of other blogs, etc. tossing out inaccurate info.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 11:59 am to VOR
"Who here believes that the entire hacking
story is 100% false and that nothing happened?"
Not me. I think the story will ultimately prove to be a "nothing burger" in terms of collusion or changing the votes from those that were cast, but I have no problem believing the Russians were up to something.
story is 100% false and that nothing happened?"
Not me. I think the story will ultimately prove to be a "nothing burger" in terms of collusion or changing the votes from those that were cast, but I have no problem believing the Russians were up to something.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 12:00 pm to VOR
If they did, I've yet to see any proof. I've seen a hell of a lot more evidence of collusion and illegal interference by our own sitting government and political parties than by any foreign actors to date. If there was any such actions by the Russians, I'm sure the evidence will eventually come to light, but until then, I will not subscribe to the theory of Russian interference.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News