Started By
Message

re: So I've never watched 2001: a space odyssey

Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:27 am to
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69429 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:27 am to
Very slow and boring.
Posted by ScottFowler
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2012
4177 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:43 am to
Awesome movie...
It's not an action movie set in a sci-fi setting.
A science fiction movie dealing with grand ideas.
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
22909 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:48 am to
The transition from the Dawn of Man to the year 2001 is one of the best edits/jump cuts in movie history.
Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 10:26 am to
People who get all pissy when others don't like what they like need to remove the seats from their bicycles.
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
25965 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:03 am to
quote:

It's also fricking boring as shite


There are some parts of the movie that are slooowww and dragged on too long, but I enjoyed it.
Posted by Freder
Member since Aug 2014
809 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

There are some parts of the movie that are slooowww and dragged on too long


That was a major symbolic point Kubrick was trying to convey. Realistic space travel is a slow and extremely precise process. It also symbolizes Man's insignificance in the Universe. Thus, there is a need for humans to continue evolving.
Posted by LeonPhelps
Member since May 2008
8185 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 3:10 pm to
I despised it.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34532 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 3:12 pm to
Prepare to be amazed at the directing an camera work, bored for the most part and having a WTF moment at the end.

Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64685 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 3:15 pm to
Its amazing what they did with what they had to work with back then.

Very well done.

Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
52037 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

You must of misunderstood me. I've heard from people that watched it say it was boring and didn't have an interesting story like most sci fi. My understanding is that it's loved because of its visuals?


Kubrick was visionary in his story-telling in this one, but it's much more of a high-minded art film that happens to take place within the Sci-Fi realm. He literally beats the viewer over the head with his long, plodding imagery. Stan, space is big and empty. We get it.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
151107 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

He literally beats the viewer over the head with his long, plodding imagery. Stan, space is big and empty. We get it.

That is true. I will tell the OP this though...I went into it sort fo expecting to be bored with it, and I cam eout of it loving it much more than I ever expected to.

There are boring parts, sure, but they at least make some sense within the movie.

I did FFWD through the black opening and kaleidoscope ending though. I didn't need 4 straignt minutes of that shite to get the point.
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
21084 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 4:45 pm to
I did not like it. I get that space travel takes a long time. I also get that driving across the country takes a long time too, but I don't see the point in watching that real time if absolutely nothing is happening between getting from point A to point B. The long prologue space travel scene just seems like one big practical joke ala Andy Kaufman. You will keep asking yourself, "how much longer could this BS go on?"
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39373 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

I did FFWD through the black opening and kaleidoscope ending though. I didn't need 4 straignt minutes of that shite to get the point.

That black opening is part of the point of the movie. Same with the trippy visuals near the end. You really need to open your brain with this movie but its all worth it.
Posted by CaLSUTigerFan
California Bay Area
Member since Sep 2008
1195 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 6:23 pm to
Saw it when it came out. Slept through part of it. Shouldn't have gone to the Bengal first.
Posted by WITNESS23
Member since Feb 2010
13725 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:41 pm to
Didnt enjoy it
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
110051 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

The transition from the Dawn of Man to the year 2001 is one of the best edits/jump cuts in movie history.


I can't think of one that's close. That is just so genius on so many levels that I don't know where to start.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
110051 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

LeonPhelps


quote:

I despised it.


Shocking
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
151107 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 8:32 am to
quote:

That black opening is part of the point of the movie. Same with the trippy visuals near the end.

Oh I know. I just didn't need to be beat over the head with it for 4 minutes to get it.
Posted by Freder
Member since Aug 2014
809 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Oh I know. I just didn't need to be beat over the head with it for 4 minutes to get it.


Well, yes, the whole point of the black screen is to "beat you over the head" with it for 4 or so minutes. You (the audience) are meant to stare at the black screen (the monolith) in the same way the apes and humans stare at it for 4 or so minutes when they come across it.

Could Kubrick have made the same point in 30 seconds? Maybe. But, would it have been as thematically effective/relevant? Probably not.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram