- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
![locked post](https://www.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/lock.gif)
BOOM, New Climate Data Rigging Scandal Rocks US Govt.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:18 pm
The jig. She is up, señor.
LINK
Well damn.
LINK
quote:
A newly-uncovered and monumental calculating error in official US government climate data shows beyond doubt that climate scientists unjustifiably added on a whopping one degree of phantom warming to the official "raw" temperature record. Skeptics believe the discovery may trigger the biggest of all “climate con” scandals in Congress and sound the death knell on American climate policy.
quote:
Goddard reports, “I spent the evening comparing graphs…and hit the NOAA motherlode.” His diligent research exposed the real reason why there is a startling disparity between the “raw” thermometer readings, as reported by measuring stations, and the “adjusted” temperatures, those that appear in official charts and government reports. In effect, the adjustments to the “raw” thermometer measurements made by the climate scientists “turns a 90 year cooling trend into a warming trend,” says the astonished Goddard.
Well damn.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:20 pm to UL-SabanRival
An inconvenient untruth.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:21 pm to UL-SabanRival
DENIER! DENIER! No one with a brain can deny the earth is warming at an alarming rate. Look at the graphs, think of the polar bears and penguins.
Man is bad and needs to pay!
Man is bad and needs to pay!
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:24 pm to UL-SabanRival
I'm shocked.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
This post was edited on 1/27/14 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:27 pm to UL-SabanRival
These government scientists had a higher motive in mind.
Global warming was simply an effort to impose statism on all of humanity.
Global warming was simply an effort to impose statism on all of humanity.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:29 pm to UL-SabanRival
We will see how this plays out, but I'd like to see more sources pick this information up.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:30 pm to UL-SabanRival
Is this person / group legit and respected?
Serious question
Serious question
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:34 pm to UL-SabanRival
Can the EPA disappear now?
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:36 pm to UL-SabanRival
Yet another thing I've been screaming about for years. No one ever believed me when I looked at the ice core data for temperatures and CO2 levels. I was laughed at as some anti-science denier. When I told them that their models didn't account for temperature differences in the oceans dependent on depth and salinity, that the models failed to recognize that increases in temperatures meant increases in water evaporation from the oceans resulting in greater cloud cover which reflects sunlight, they just told me not to worry my little head. They are wrong about AGW, they have always been wrong, and it's a bout damn time they're convicted for this scam they've inflicted upon the world.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:39 pm to UL-SabanRival
Goddard is routinely laughed at by the AGW community, but that doesn't mean that he's not wrong.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:50 pm to UL-SabanRival
quote:DAMN!
OM, New Climate Data Rigging Scandal Rocks US Govt.
I almost hope this is not true.
I've realized for several years the CO2 Greenhouse crap was an absolute impossibility.
However, I assumed folks like Spidy were just ignoring the forest for the trees. That alone is an intolerable breech of the scientific method. It's been subject of many discussions here.
If it turns out that the science was certifiably corrupt, it will set any controversial area of science back 50 yrs.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbanghead.gif)
Posted on 1/27/14 at 6:59 pm to UL-SabanRival
I don't have much confidence that much will happen with these new findings. AGWers are true believers and they don't want to be proved wrong or find out that they have been lied to. They need the fairy tale to continue, less their psyche be devastated.
This post was edited on 1/27/14 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 1/27/14 at 7:02 pm to UL-SabanRival
I want all you deniers to know that you are all stupid for being anti science and wanting to use the world as your own dumping ground. No one with a brain could possibly deny that global warming exists.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 7:48 pm to UL-SabanRival
Here is a direct link to the guy who did the comparison. should be easy to refute if he is wrong. Lays it out very well.
LINK /
LINK /
Posted on 1/27/14 at 7:49 pm to UL-SabanRival
All of the facts, evidence, proof, confessions and whatever else you could name . . . it does not matter because NONE OF THIS will stop the Left's Long March for implementation of national and global climate change initiatives.
The reason is because the purpose of all of the climate change crap is not to attack climate change, but, rather, to redistribute wealth nationally and internationally.
The reason is because the purpose of all of the climate change crap is not to attack climate change, but, rather, to redistribute wealth nationally and internationally.
This post was edited on 1/27/14 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 1/27/14 at 8:01 pm to UL-SabanRival
Yawn. I'm pretty certain that global warming will never be proved nor disproved in my lifetime. But that's not going to stop the "it's real" or "it"s a hoax" crowd from talking out of their asses. The fact is, we don't know.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 8:09 pm to UL-SabanRival
What is the reputation of the source? The source needs to be solid to get some of these die hard Libs to think critically.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 9:50 pm to UL-SabanRival
I will answer this with the statement that whatever is said in opposition of your beliefs won't matter. No matter the source, "charts", data, or scientific evaluation. This has become a political issue for Conservatives because your leadership wanted you to believe it.
Don't believe me? Research it yourselves.
So, since you won't research beyond your political safety zones, who fricking cares?
As usual, as someone who actually has taken numerous courses on the actual science instead of reading hack articles, I am out.
Don't believe me? Research it yourselves.
So, since you won't research beyond your political safety zones, who fricking cares?
As usual, as someone who actually has taken numerous courses on the actual science instead of reading hack articles, I am out.
Posted on 1/27/14 at 9:58 pm to UL-SabanRival
Meanwhile 2013 was the 4th hottest on record. How about reading stuff from actual climatologists guys? ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)