- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Review of 50–60 million voter records revealed thousands of ineligible and outdated
Posted on 3/23/26 at 6:47 am
Posted on 3/23/26 at 6:47 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
The review of 50–60 million voter records has revealed there are thousands of ineligible and outdated registrations—including non-citizens. Some of them voted. More to come! That is what happens when strong voter ID safeguards are absent—and @TheJusticeDept will not tolerate it.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 6:54 am to loogaroo
There was no fraud.
There was
No evidence it was widespread.
Didn’t have to be.
If there was it wasn’t enough to charge the outcome.
It absolutely was.
There was
No evidence it was widespread.
Didn’t have to be.
If there was it wasn’t enough to charge the outcome.
It absolutely was.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 6:57 am to loogaroo
I'm sure it's nothing. Trump didn't have a glowing eulogy about a man whose name was carved in stone in one of the concentrated efforts to destroy Trump's Presidency and personal life.
That's much more important than Harmeet's findings.
That's much more important than Harmeet's findings.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:01 am to loogaroo
Very convenient that this random Twitter account doesn’t produce the numbers.
“Some of them voted” sounds like they are just blabbing nonsense.
So many words… yet no actual information
Maybe one day yall will figure it out… one can hope….
“Some of them voted” sounds like they are just blabbing nonsense.
So many words… yet no actual information
Maybe one day yall will figure it out… one can hope….
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:05 am to AGGIES
quote:
Very convenient that this random Twitter account doesn’t produce the numbers.
The numbers aren't really good for the muh steal argument. People who are ignorant see "thousands" and think its a big number and don't compare the denominator to understand the % involved, nor do they understand the acceptable MOE in elections.
Also, this raises all sorts of questions for the states who pulled out of ERIC a few years ago, because identifying these outdated duplicate registrations was one of the primary goals of ERIC. Also, just understanding the issues and why things like ERIC were formed proves that this isn't some new revelation. It just seems that way for the ignorant.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:12 am to SlowFlowPro
Joe Biden got 81 million votes. The most ever!! Now he can't even raise money for his library Think about that.
This post was edited on 3/23/26 at 7:44 am
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:14 am to Timeoday
You’re asking a lot from Slow.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:19 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
You’re asking a lot from Slow.
He didn't even say anything of substance
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:22 am to Timeoday
The issue is that these are republican states that offered up the information. I think there were 21 democrat states who refused, where most of the problems are.
How you can legally not fulfill the request from the federal govt for federal voter rolls is beyond me. And lets not start with the "states control elections" babbling or I will introduce you to George Wallace and the national guard.
Its the same 21 states who refuse to submit lists of who is on medicare in states, a federally funded program.
It should be quite obvious the "invasion of privacy" is just a thinly veiled excuse to hide the fact they know they are stealing elections and stealing taxpayer dollars.
Same nonsense with these sanctuary cities.
At some point it will take draconian measures to make these "states" decide if they want to be part of the "United" states or not.
How you can legally not fulfill the request from the federal govt for federal voter rolls is beyond me. And lets not start with the "states control elections" babbling or I will introduce you to George Wallace and the national guard.
Its the same 21 states who refuse to submit lists of who is on medicare in states, a federally funded program.
It should be quite obvious the "invasion of privacy" is just a thinly veiled excuse to hide the fact they know they are stealing elections and stealing taxpayer dollars.
Same nonsense with these sanctuary cities.
At some point it will take draconian measures to make these "states" decide if they want to be part of the "United" states or not.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The numbers aren't really good for the muh steal argument. People who are ignorant see "thousands" and think its a big number and don't compare the denominator to understand the % involved, nor do they understand the acceptable MOE in elections.
Fricking retarded argument. To be a “lawyer” or whatever you are and not see an issue with this statement is why our country has no chance.
End all fraud with voter ID and SAVE ACT and have severe consequences for anyone who commits fraud is the solution. Local and State elections can be decided by a small amount of votes which is why our government is in shambles. YOU don’t get to decide what is or is not “enough” fraud to steal an election.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He didn't even say anything of substance
See!
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:01 am to loogaroo
The blue States never clean up update their voter rolls. DUH.
When NC did years ago Trump one...
Dems won special elections in PA they want their teeth back in PA.
When NC did years ago Trump one...
Dems won special elections in PA they want their teeth back in PA.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:09 am to loogaroo
Democrats ‘probably won’t win an election for 50 years’ if strict voter ID bill passes
Donald J Trump
Donald J Trump
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:14 am to AGGIES
quote:
Very convenient that this random Twitter account doesn’t produce the numbers.
Here you go:
quote:
The audit of voter registration records found more than 300,000 deceased individuals still listed as active voters, as well as tens of thousands of non-citizens who have already cast ballots in federal elections. Dhillon’s team has been actively addressing the issue of inaccurate voter rolls since President Trump took office. In December 2025, a report noted that an initial review of 47.5 million records revealed over 260,000 deceased voters and thousands of illegal registrations.
https://conservativebrief.com/doj-fraud-99828/
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:16 am to loogaroo
quote:
The audit of voter registration records found more than 300,000 deceased individuals still listed as active voters
This is exactly why ERIC was formed. Why did so many red states pull out?
ERIC was working to solve this issue LINK
quote:
Member states securely submit voter registration and motor vehicle department data to ERIC. ERIC is also certified to use official death data from the Social Security Administration and subscribes to change of address data from the United States Postal Service.
Utilizing these four data sources, ERIC provides its members with reports that identify inaccurate or out-of-date voter registration records, deceased voters, individuals who appear to be eligible to vote but who are not yet registered, and possible cases of illegal voting.
In compliance with federal and state laws, members use these reports to contact voters for the purposes of updating their record or to remove ineligible and deceased voters from the rolls. Members also contact likely eligible but not yet registered individuals, providing information on how best to register. Possible cases of illegal voting are reviewed and, if found credible, referred to law enforcement.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:22 am to SlowFlowPro
LINK
quote:
ERIC was formed to help states maintain accurate voter rolls and spot illegal voting.3 But instances
of duplicate voting and out-of-state or out-of-precinct voting continue despite ERIC’s involvement.
ERIC has failed at its stated mission of maintaining voter rolls because its true mission is to increase
voter registration. Fortunately, a growing number of states are leaving ERIC, and more should
follow.4
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is exactly why ERIC was formed. Why did so many red states pull out?
Because it’s another scam:
quote:
Seven states have withdrawn their memberships in ERIC, the Electronic Registration Information Center. The name sounds innocuous enough. But its seed money came from the Pew Charitable Trusts, a favorite of George Soros, and conservative commentators call it one of the most nefarious election-fraud establishments in the country.
quote:
Members must turn over all data on every voter, past and present, along with information from other agencies: green card and state ID holders, including driver’s licenses. Federal records are used as well, both from the Social Security death index and the U.S. Postal Service. Analyzing all this data, ERIC discovers those who are disqualified. But instead of purging them from voter lists, the organization requires member states to solicit voter registrations from those ineligible voters. Kat Stansell, Grassroots Coordinator with the American Policy Center, told The New American what the results of these data gymnastics were in 2020:
https://thenewamerican.com/us/politics/republicans-exit-eric-citing-voter-fraud-potential/
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:24 am to trinidadtiger
“ How you can legally not fulfill the request from the federal govt for federal voter rolls”(quote tt).
Because allowing public viewing of the fraudulent ballots would pull the Muh “no evidence “ rug out from under the election fraud deniers.
It wouldn’t matter though. They’d use move to the “everybody is a citizen “ narrative.
Because allowing public viewing of the fraudulent ballots would pull the Muh “no evidence “ rug out from under the election fraud deniers.
It wouldn’t matter though. They’d use move to the “everybody is a citizen “ narrative.
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The numbers aren't really good for the muh steal argument. People who are ignorant see "thousands" and think its a big number and don't compare the denominator to understand the % involved, nor do they understand the acceptable MOE in elections.
Also, this raises all sorts of questions for the states who pulled out of ERIC a few years ago, because identifying these outdated duplicate registrations was one of the primary goals of ERIC. Also, just understanding the issues and why things like ERIC were formed proves that this isn't some new revelation. It just seems that way for the ignorant.
quite possibly the most idiotic post you've ever penned. Are you OK??
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:27 am to loogaroo
The bottom line is that the system is engineered to look as if there's no fraud. It is generally impossible to prove a negative, and - just like progressives always do - they litigate against the investigation of fraud because "muh civil rights".
Popular
Back to top


15










