Started By
Message

re: Review of 50–60 million voter records revealed thousands of ineligible and outdated

Posted on 3/23/26 at 6:41 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477249 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

say we've got 100K non-citizens registered to vote in Arizona. For argument's sake, let's say 20K of them voted. How would this be discovered?

The rolls.

Election results show who voted in elections (just not the results).

So if you find a person is not a citizen and registered, you can easily figure out if they voted (Which is how all of these cases are prosecuted)

It's the "dead" registrations that are where the real fraud can occur. But you can still figure out the level of fraud here, too, by seeing which of those "dead" registrations voted. All of those votes are automatically fraudulent, so you can figure out a fraud rate. You can't figure out how those fraudulent votes voted, though.

That's why focusing on the non-citizen voting is inefficient for this discussion and really shows who has been polluted by talking points.

IF there is fraud on any scale, it's via "dead" registrants.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477249 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

ID needed to vote. Fukk you!


You seem confused

I believe all states should have voter ID laws
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22765 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

So if you find a person is not a citizen and registered, you can easily figure out if they voted (Which is how all of these cases are prosecuted)

How would one find that a person is a non-citizen?

quote:

That's why focusing on the non-citizen voting is inefficient for this discussion and really shows who has been polluted by talking points.

Says the guy that a couple of months ago didn't know it was illegal for states to require proof of citizenship to register for federal elections.

Reality is nobody knows if we have a problem or not. Nobody knows how many non-citizens are registered. Nobody knows how many of the registered non-citizens have cast a vote. The whole system is gummed up in nonsense, and the more certain people get twisted up in knots about something as simple/obvious as proof of citizenship to registered/ID to vote, the more it comes across like there's something there.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477249 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

How would one find that a person is a non-citizen?


Take that question outside of this context and ask it in your head.

quote:

Says the guy that a couple of months ago didn't know it was illegal for states to require proof of citizenship to register for federal elections.



I let this slide earlier, but you did the same dishonest/bad rhetoric in this thread, responding to posts about voter ID with this non sequitur.

Stop

Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90795 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 6:57 pm to
Outside this context!
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22765 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

I let this slide earlier, but you did the same dishonest/bad rhetoric in this thread, responding to posts about voter ID with this non sequitur.

Stop


You're suggesting that there's not an exchange between us 2-3 months ago where you didn't believe me that it was illegal to require proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections? I'm not talking about a couple of days ago/week ago when you (laughingly) complimented me on getting the case (AZ vs. Tribal Council) right.

quote:


Take that question outside of this context and ask it in your head

Instead, how about you answer the question. I'm a non-citizen. I registered to vote. I voted. How is it discovered that a non-citizen voted?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477249 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

Instead, how about you answer the question.

There are near infinite ways to determine if someone is a non-citiezen

Have you missed all the ICE threads on here? Deportation stories/stats?

quote:

I registered to vote. I voted. How is it discovered that a non-citizen voted?


Well that is a change from this earlier

quote:

How would one find that a person is a non-citizen?


And you're adding the exact framing my post (and the language you quoted) points out

quote:

Take that question outside of this context and ask it in your head


Follow my advice above to answer the actual question you asked (not the pivot you just tried in your last post)
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22765 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

There are near infinite ways to determine if someone is a non-citiezen

Have you missed all the ICE threads on here? Deportation stories/stats?


Can you just answer the question? How is it discovered that a non-citizen that registered to vote, voted? And I mean in the normal course of business.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89832 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 8:11 pm to
Problem is the idiot you responded to believes Russia hacked our elections.



Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
47866 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

Very convenient that this random Twitter account doesn’t produce the numbers. “Some of them voted” sounds like they are just blabbing nonsense. So many words… yet no actual information Maybe one day yall will figure it out… one can hope….


Can’t imagine being as dumb as this
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26542 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

the more important question is what is wrong with registering people who are ineligible to vote?


Based on voter registration citizen surveys in Arizona where 1500 people were registered as living on one vacant lot, I'd say phantom voters are a major part of the fraud.

Every state needs to have yearly random surveys to check if people registered at their listed address are real people, still live in state, are alive and are citizens.

Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26542 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

No one is saying proof of absence. The question is whether the proof is anywhere significant and constitutes a real problem.


In Arizona, a citizen survey that actually checked voter registrations listed addresses found that around 30% were bogus. In one case, they found 1500 voters registered to the same vacant lot.

Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12407 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 10:00 pm to
I hadn’t heard of this story. Not seeing anything on it. Only thing I found was that homeless people in Maricopa County can register using a municipal courthouse or city building.

Where did you get the number 1500 from? Is there more to the story, like how many of those suspicious voters had cast ballots?
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26542 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

How would one find that a person is a non-citizen?


Government does keep records of citizenship for many purposes. It also keeps records of citizenship, voter registrations and voting records among other things. The only thing that it doesn't have records of due to our secret ballots is who voted for who.



Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26542 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

I hadn’t heard of this story. Not seeing anything on it. Only thing I found was that homeless people in Maricopa County can register using a municipal courthouse or city building.

Where did you get the number 1500 from? Is there more to the story, like how many of those suspicious voters had cast ballots?


Unfortunately, the link is no longer active, but it was a statistical guy who did an initial survey comparing Arizona voter registrants to their listed addresses. His survey indicated that around 30% weren't living at their listed address. Based on his initial findings, a group of about 800 people volunteered to physically go and check a very large sample of Arizona voter registrations. They found that indeed about 30% were either bogus, phantoms, people who moved out of state, or were dead. That's where the 1500 people listing their address at the same vacant lot came from along with many other absurd examples.

Louder With Crowder did their own small video version having a producer check some addresses. One they found with an address that turned out to be in an under pass. The day after the show aired, several of the bogus addresses listed changed. Not exactly a serious survey from Crowder, but clearly the fraudsters were actively covering their tracks and revealing how easy it was for them to "officially" manipulate registration data.

Grok found some of the original Piton survey, but no details on how deep the Citizen survey went. And of course, the usual suspects said "there is no evidence."

"Statistion Piton" appears to be a reference to Bobby Piton (sometimes described as a mathematician or data analyst), who conducted an informal analysis of Arizona voter registration data in late 2020. He presented his findings at a November 30, 2020, hearing in Phoenix organized by Republican state legislators (often associated with Rudy Giuliani's efforts to challenge the 2020 election results).

realclearpolitics.com

Key Claims from Piton's AnalysisPiton examined publicly available or shared Arizona voter registration records and highlighted what he viewed as statistical anomalies suggesting widespread irregularities or "phantom voters." His main points included:Voter turnout and registration growth far outpacing population growth. He noted that Arizona's population grew about 40% from 2000 to 2020, but the number of people voting allegedly tripled (from roughly 1.1 million in 1998 to 3.2 million in 2020). He argued this indicated fraud building gradually over more than a decade.

facebook.com

Large numbers of "fake people" or invalid registrations, estimating 120,000 to 306,000 ballots potentially cast by non-existent or ineligible voters. He claimed he would "bet his own life" on the election being fraudulent based on the data.

vice.com

Anomalies in voter data fields, such as ~460,000 registered voters with missing or "U" (unknown) sex/gender entries, along with other patterns in addresses, registrations, and voting history that he flagged as suspicious (e.g., clusters of registrations at certain addresses).

reddit.com

He provided a sample of ~3,900 "questionable" voter names to activist groups like We The People AZ Alliance (led by Liz Harris) for further canvassing. Some reports from those efforts claimed issues like multiple voters at single addresses.

usatoday.com

Piton described himself as analyzing official government data and worked informally with some involved in the later 2021 Maricopa County audit (though his role was unofficial and not central to the final Cyber Ninjas report). He also sent letters to Arizona legislators urging decertification of the 2020 results.



Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150405 posts
Posted on 3/23/26 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

More to come!
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22765 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Government does keep records of citizenship for many purposes

The irony here is the principal reason federal law forbids states from requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections is because the government doesn't keep an accurate record of citizens.

quote:

It also keeps records of citizenship, voter registrations and voting records among other things. The only thing that it doesn't have records of due to our secret ballots is who voted for who.

I'll ask the question SFP couldn't answer - I'm a non-citizen. I register to vote in federal elections using the postcard. I listed Sun Devil Stadium as my address (which is legal to do), and did not provide a SSN, DL or any proof of citizenship. I then vote by dropping my ballot off at a dropbox, which means instead of ID, they're verifying my signature on the envelope w/ the signature on my registration postcard.

How is it discovered that my vote is fraudulent?
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140864 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:06 pm to
Wasn't there something like 31,000 votes that came into Georgia, but they all only voted for Biden and no other races down the ticket? Or is that just a loony claim?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63101 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Also, this raises all sorts of questions for the states who pulled out of ERIC a few years ago, because identifying these outdated duplicate registrations was one of the primary goals of ERIC. Also, just understanding the issues and why things like ERIC were formed proves that this isn't some new revelation. It just seems that way for the ignorant.



Anyone who thinks ERIC was built to clean up voter rolls is retarded.

Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63101 posts
Posted on 3/24/26 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

This is exactly why ERIC was formed. Why did so many red states pull out?



Because how it operated was contrary to its stated goal just like a ton of leftist programs that result in fraud.

ERIC's actual purpose was to inflate voter rolls to allow for the fraud that we saw in 2020.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram