- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NPR Uses The Term “Voter Restriction” Instead Of “Voter Identification”
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:19 pm
Just listened to a story on npr with a nasally sounding guy from the NYT about the SAVE Act.
The term voter identification was never used. Rather, the term voter restriction was used to refer to voter identification.
Fair?
The term voter identification was never used. Rather, the term voter restriction was used to refer to voter identification.
Fair?
14
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:20 pm to LuckyTiger
Yet, they want taxpayer funding
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:22 pm to LuckyTiger
Terrorist became freedom fighter. This is par for the course on media manipulation of morons.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:23 pm to udtiger
quote:
Yet, they want taxpayer funding
They’ll probably get it again after November when the Democrats take over.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:24 pm to LuckyTiger
I don’t have a problem with that description. Voting should be restricted.
It’s not open to minors. It’s not open to non-citizens.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:25 pm to LuckyTiger
If 65 non-citizens voted since 1980 according to… the heritage foundation
I need you to convince me this is not pointless spending to fix a problem that doesn’t exist / that it is more likely to benefit the country than it is to unintentionally disenfranchise eligible voters.
Also, what does the SAVE act specifically consist of? It’s not just “photo ID” correct?
I need you to convince me this is not pointless spending to fix a problem that doesn’t exist / that it is more likely to benefit the country than it is to unintentionally disenfranchise eligible voters.
Also, what does the SAVE act specifically consist of? It’s not just “photo ID” correct?
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:30 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
If 65 non-citizens voted since 1980 according to… the heritage foundation
There is no way to verify this. And it goes way beyond non-citizens - dead people, people voting more than once, non-existent people, people who have moved away, etc.
This also helps to restrict ballot harvesting and other forms of voter fraud.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:36 pm to LuckyTiger
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:43 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:
It’s not open to non-citizens.
Except in blue states.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:45 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
There is no way to verify this. And it goes way beyond non-citizens - dead people, people voting more than once, non-existent people, people who have moved away, etc.
This also helps to restrict ballot harvesting and other forms of voter fraud.
By all accounts, intentional fraud is rare and usually caught.
I don’t have a problem with making it harder to register, but if we are going to require original birth certificates to register AND regularly purge rolls …that just sounds like a pain in the arse.
I’m not vehemently opposed to it, but the only explanation I can come up with why congressional republicans aren’t pushing it through is that they know it’s not going to have an effect on elections …but will cost money & potentially aggravate some people on their own side of the isle once actually implemented.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 3:47 pm to LuckyTiger
You're damn right I want “restricted voting”. I only want eligible citizens in that booth.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 4:06 pm to LuckyTiger
The Advocate used the term ‘stunt artist’ the other day when referring to one of those assholes who rides dirt bikes through the city at high speeds (it was in NOLA) doing wheelies and violating every known traffic rule.
The bastardization of terms and the English language is one of the left’s most wildly successful enterprises.
The bastardization of terms and the English language is one of the left’s most wildly successful enterprises.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 4:07 pm to DeathByTossDive225
Why do you support voter fraud?
Posted on 3/20/26 at 4:31 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
By all accounts, intentional fraud is rare and usually caught.
wut?? - by whose account??
Intentional fraud is a feature, not a rare mistake by happenstance. It is planned - it is paid for - it is the predominate feature of democrat election planning.
DO YOU THINK - the dems would be this wrapped around the axle is it were REALLY about some old maid who cannot verify her identity?
Posted on 3/20/26 at 4:31 pm to LuckyTiger
Newspeak
Peak newspeak
Peak newspeak
Posted on 3/20/26 at 4:33 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:
I don’t have a problem with that description. Voting should be restricted.
It’s not open to minors. It’s not open to non-citizens.
The term goes much broader. It's not open to my dog. And he's even a white male.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 4:42 pm to LuckyTiger
muh disenfranchised voters
Posted on 3/20/26 at 6:00 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
If 65 non-citizens voted since 1980 according to… the heritage foundation
I need you to convince me this is not pointless spending to fix a problem that doesn’t exist / that it is more likely to benefit the country than it is to unintentionally disenfranchise eligible voters
A non citizen voting disenfranchises voters.
You don't actually care about that.
Also your posts come off as a democrat. You disenfranchised millions of voters by pushing Biden aside. You have only been dishonest with every single post.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 6:02 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
By all accounts, intentional fraud is rare and usually caught.
Wow.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 6:04 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
If 65 non-citizens voted since 1980 according to… the heritage foundation
WTF is that bullshite?
How the frick would THEY know?
Cite that
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News