Started By
Message

What WRs in the draft can be actual #1 WRs?

Posted on 3/19/26 at 10:25 am
Posted by Lsujacket66
Member since Dec 2010
5163 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 10:25 am
It seems a lot of national guys have us taking Tate or Lemon at 8.. but are either of them #1 WRs?

We have Olave and Vele who are really good #2 and #3 options.. if we are going to draft WR high it should be someone who is clearly better than them, and I’m not sure the top guys are.

Maybe Tyson, who I think is the most talented WR and reminds me of Odell, but he has injury issues and do we want 2 WRs with injury issues?

TBH I think a healthy Chris Bell has maybe the best chance to be a true #1 and has a lot of AJ Brown to his game.

I also think there’s a ton of depth at this WR class and someone like Antonio Williams in the 3rd could be as impactful for our offense as taking any of the first rd guys.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178022 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 10:27 am to
Cooper Jr has star potential imo and can be that 1 production WR.
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7781 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 10:33 am to
Chris Bell was the most impressive looking receiver I saw out of this class, but I know there are some concerns about him. I saw Lemon a good bit, and I like him a lot, but he struck me more as the kind of guy you "should" be able to get later in the draft than #8. While I love the "idea" of getting a WR1 with the 8th pick, I am a little nervous that there won't be such a guy at 8. And I really want this pick to hit big because it could accelerate the Saints' progression with Shough if you end up with a real difference maker.
Posted by NewBeginnings
Member since Feb 2023
359 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:02 am to
I like Chris Bell but he does have concerns other than his injury recovery. Scouts that I’ve read have highlighted that he doesn’t run a full route tree. Very limited in his routes and depended a lot of his physical traits more than refined skills.
That weakness can be taught but it takes time, dedication, and desire to get better at finer aspects of WR play.
Posted by Jojodaddy
Member since Dec 2015
597 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:03 am to
Advanced stats show that Lemon and, to a lesser extent Tate, compare to some of the top guys that are in the league right now. They may lack the raw RAS of the “prototype” but they can ball. Both fit well next to Olave style wise. I’d be happy with either.
Posted by Tank77
Member since Mar 2019
766 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:15 am to
All Pro Olave #2 option….
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
6677 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:18 am to
It's honestly a very weak year for receivers. I'd go slot receiver in a later round and get your #1 in next year's draft.
Posted by Lsujacket66
Member since Dec 2010
5163 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:27 am to
quote:

It's honestly a very weak year for receivers. I'd go slot receiver in a later round and get your #1 in next year's draft.

I wouldn’t say weak… just not the top end stars… it’s very deep
Posted by jamal
Places Unknown
Member since Jan 2013
13074 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:43 am to
Tyson 100% could be. The only thing is his injury history. The skill set and talent is there.
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
19417 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:45 am to
We have never had a WR with the quick twitch suddenness of Tyson. Olave can create the type of seperation as him, but he is more smooth.
Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
5232 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:36 pm to
Tyson if he is 100
Posted by VA LSU fan
Virginia
Member since Dec 2007
8777 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:49 pm to
No receiver in this class is good enough to be a #1 and push Olave to #2.


Chris Bell could be a good 1b to Olave's 1a. But Bell is a round 2 pick.

I'd rather take an OT over WR in round 1.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
26552 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:54 pm to
You nailed it, but heaven forbid people look at WR like they look At other positions and recognize that Olave, like Tate, is not a 1.

Tyson and bell are at the top of the list for me. I really want bell because he can be had in the 2nd and he already has chemistry with Shough.

quote:

No receiver in this class is good enough to be a #1 and push Olave to #2.


Perfect example. You’re looking at production and not position. It’s like a dominant RT vs a really good LT. Olave is a dominant RT in this example. He will never be a true 1. He cannot hold up when exploring the whole route tree.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 1:57 pm
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74343 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

No receiver in this class is good enough to be a #1 and push Olave to #2.


Size, YAC, contested catch ability are three things elite WRs have that Olave doesn’t. There are WRs in this class who possess these traits, therefore they do have the ability to be better than Olave
Posted by Whodat4300
Tennessee
Member since Jul 2020
1252 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 3:39 pm to
Bring Bell in, 2nd round. They have tremendous chemistry and Bell is just as good as the top guys if he recovers from his injury. Go defense at 8.
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
58868 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

It's honestly a very weak year for receivers. I'd go slot receiver in a later round and get your #1 in next year's draft.


So what do you do about WR1 for the 2026 season?!?!

Just say “frick it”?!?!
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
6677 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

So what do you do about WR1 for the 2026 season?!?! Just say “frick it”?!?!
Hope Olave can be that guy
Posted by bonethug0180
Avondale
Member since Jul 2018
5369 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 5:12 pm to
I mean he is that guy and has ranked 18th, 17th, 149th (8 games played), and 8th in yards each year (and this includes TEs and HBs as well as WRs).

If a player is ranking in the top 20 in every (healthy) season, how is that not a number 1 receiver? Unless my math is bad and we only have 16 teams in the league or something.

People really turned on this dude quick after Carr fricking nearly threw him into several comas.

Edit:
I think people need to learn what certain terms mean. People say number one receiver but I think they really mean a top 5 receiver. Huge difference there.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 5:16 pm
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
22051 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 5:15 pm to
People constantly flexing on Olave not being a number 1 receiver are retarded. Absolutely retarded.
Posted by bonethug0180
Avondale
Member since Jul 2018
5369 posts
Posted on 3/19/26 at 5:19 pm to
I will agree he isn't the prototypical "number 1 receiver" but neither is Amon-Ra, Steve Smith, Wes Welker, etc.

Dude is putting up crazy good stats and had just one bad year because he was lead into 2 HORRIBLE hits.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 5:20 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram