Started By
Message
locked post

Why is it that nobody questions the 10 million Stalin killed, or the 30 mil Mao killed?

Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:28 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83330 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:28 pm
Both accomplished their feats in roughly the same amount of time as Hitler's Final Solution.

Yet people bend over backwards to claim Hitler could not have accomplished such a smaller scale feat.

Crazy to me how all this can exist in the same brain.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
195842 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:30 pm to
Grapes
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:31 pm to
Hey, if you’re going to call them out, you might as well do it right.

Stalin killed 20 million.
Mao killed 55 million.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83330 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

Stalin killed 20 million.
Mao killed 55 million.
I am talking about in 4 year periods

Holodomor was 3 years, 10 million dead

GLF was 4 years, 30 million dead

and a good case is made that Mao's bodycount was 90 million

Second only to Bonnie Bleu
This post was edited on 3/9/26 at 11:35 pm
Posted by DVinBR
Member since Jan 2013
15574 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:38 pm to
Don't forget the Japanese
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
9684 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:39 pm to
Did you apply the automatic multiplier for individual human worth of one group over the other? That is the only explanation.
Posted by SwampGar
Texas
Member since Jan 2020
1432 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:40 pm to
Bonnie Bleu?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:42 pm to
Ehhh, I just do total. Hitler had less time to do it, and murdered a horrifically impressive 17 million people in like 10 years.

Now compare that to Anthony Fauci, which for his mass murder spree outside of the AIDS Crisis is pretty much on point for the same time period as Hitler from the time he invaded Poland. Well he’s up to 25 million bare minimum given the excess mortality rate this decade. Just FYI, the worldwide excess mortality rate from 2000 to 2019 was… ZERO. They calculated what the number of people should have died, and until 2019 they got it right. Ever since then, it’s skyrocketed.

So biggest mass murderers in history it is:

1) Mao Zedong- 55 Million+ (when you include the forced abortions)
2) Genghis Khan- 40 million
3) Anthony Fauci- 25 million+
4) Joseph Stalin- 20 million
5) Adolf Hitler- 17 million
This post was edited on 3/9/26 at 11:46 pm
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81713 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:57 pm to
q
quote:

1) Mao Zedong- 55 Million+ (when you include the forced abortions)
2) Genghis Khan- 40 million
3) Anthony Fauci- 25 million+
4) Joseph Stalin- 20 million
5) Adolf Hitler- 17 million



The least harmful guy on the list is the only one that didn't get to die peacefully as an old man.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17546 posts
Posted on 3/9/26 at 11:58 pm to
Because it demonstrates the propensity for violence and the inability to demonstrate impartiality by leftist. Something we see on display daily.
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4156 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:10 am to
Because the Russian and Chinese population in the U.S. was basically non-existent compared to the Jewish population at the time
This post was edited on 3/10/26 at 12:36 am
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
14981 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:30 am to
Joos
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
29804 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:39 am to
quote:

Bonnie Bleu?

She needed the money.
This post was edited on 3/10/26 at 12:40 am
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
91089 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:56 am to
quote:

Both accomplished their feats in roughly the same amount of time as Hitler's Final Solution.



Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
35733 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 2:48 am to
Eddie Izzard already explained it: they killed their own people... which, for some reason, the world is kind of ok with that.

Posted by Gifman
Sanibel, FL
Member since Jan 2021
18519 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 3:24 am to
Because Mao and Stalin are leftist heroes
Posted by ChiefCornerstone
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2022
618 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 5:37 am to
Where are yall getting these low numbers??

Hitler: correct about 17M

Stalin: try 50-75M (some think more). Example: the Russians would release most all gulag prisoners just before they died of starvation so the numbers would not be counted against them. After the fall of the Soviet Union, many eye witnesses came forward.

Mao: north of 75M is the consensus I can find. Some place the higher estimate at 125M.

Fauci: give me a break. Including him discredits your post entirely. Have you ever met the man??

One source:

LINK
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
35656 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 5:38 am to
quote:

Mao Zedong


They're still running his playbook, well ahead of his time.
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
9198 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 5:54 am to
quote:

Fauci: give me a break. Including him discredits your post entirely. Have you ever met the man??


I also though fauci’s numbers were low

Seriously, frick that guy.
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
4485 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 6:15 am to
Nobody questions this? Are you kidding? Ever read a book or take a history class in college? Those two are considered some of the worst mass murderers in history.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram