Started By
Message

Trump bans AI giant Anthropic, after dispute of AI military weapons and surveillance

Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:10 pm
Posted by RelicBatches86
Florida
Member since Nov 2024
1256 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:10 pm
Posted by RelicBatches86
Florida
Member since Nov 2024
1256 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:11 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


This week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States Government or the Pentagon.

Our position has never wavered and will never waver: the Department of War must have full, unrestricted access to Anthropic’s models for every LAWFUL purpose in defense of the Republic.

Instead, @AnthropicAI and its CEO @DarioAmodei, have chosen duplicity. Cloaked in the sanctimonious rhetoric of “effective altruism,” they have attempted to strong-arm the United States military into submission - a cowardly act of corporate virtue-signaling that places Silicon Valley ideology above American lives.

The Terms of Service of Anthropic’s defective altruism will never outweigh the safety, the readiness, or the lives of American troops on the battlefield.

Their true objective is unmistakable: to seize veto power over the operational decisions of the United States military. That is unacceptable.

As President Trump stated on Truth Social, the Commander-in-Chief and the American people alone will determine the destiny of our armed forces, not unelected tech executives.

Anthropic’s stance is fundamentally incompatible with American principles. Their relationship with the United States Armed Forces and the Federal Government has therefore been permanently altered.

In conjunction with the President's directive for the Federal Government to cease all use of Anthropic's technology, I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security. Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic. Anthropic will continue to provide the Department of War its services for a period of no more than six months to allow for a seamless transition to a better and more patriotic service.

America’s warfighters will never be held hostage by the ideological whims of Big Tech. This decision is final
Posted by RelicBatches86
Florida
Member since Nov 2024
1256 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:15 pm to
tldr Pentagon wants AI companies to remove guardrails on AI
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


???? The Pentagon has given Anthropic until 5:01 pm today to yank the kill-switches off its AI so it could be used for “all lawful purposes,” which apparently includes everything up to (but not officially including) Skynet Lite™.

If they don't, the Pentagon "will terminate its partnership with Anthropic and deem them a supply chain risk."

Source: Reuters
Posted by Augustus516
Member since Oct 2024
402 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:17 pm to
The Germans seem to be coming up with a solution to Anthropic
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
19384 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:21 pm to
Reminiscent of these music artists who sell their souls to music services......then demand their music only be used on their terms.

Im paying.....Im playing.

Posted by DaveyJones12
Member since Dec 2022
335 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:42 pm to
Sorry, I don’t want the US government using AI tools to conduct MASS SURVEILLANCE on US CITIZENS or fully unleashing a COMPUTER PROGRAM to make KILL DECISIONS

Those are Anthropics two stipulations. Even for heat sealing missles…somebody has to (1) give the order to fire and (2) push the damn button. Why does Pete want to spy on us and why does he want to give a woke computer the authority to us WEAPONS without human approval?????
Posted by Ebridg3
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Sep 2016
3128 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:58 pm to
This is a big deal.

Anthropic has the best AI in the world and it isnt even close. There's nothing out there that can touch it.
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
7055 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

Anthropic has the best AI in the world and it isnt even close. There's nothing out there that can touch it


It's such a national risk the government is giving them a 6 month wind down.

Anthropic has made major in roads into finance. The government will try to contract back with anthropic in 7 months at twice the price of whatever they have now.

Open ai and google are focused on the end users. Anthropic is enterprise-centric company the code generation it puts out isn't even close at scale. If I were a betting person, I think Meta wil make a move. Their ai is better than people think.
Posted by E Redcoat
Member since Jan 2026
5 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:43 pm to
Yeah seems bad. The surveillance implications are crazy, especially when we contemplate what some future administration might use it for.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9053 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:54 pm to
This is so fricking stupid. We’re fricking up our management of AI every way imaginable. It’s arguably been Trump’s single worse area.
Posted by bignuss18
Member since Sep 2025
806 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:55 pm to
Altman will call in his Jew crew buddies to change Trump’s mind
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
86867 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:57 pm to
Pete and Trump have not come across as strong on this at all IMO

Maybe it'll still turn out well for the administration, but it certainly seems like a bunch of shifting goal posts and yelling as their opponent holds firm. We'll see.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7164 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Altman will call in his Jew crew buddies to change Trump’s mind

Altman hates Anthropic...
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
21975 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Sorry, I don’t want the US government using AI tools to conduct MASS SURVEILLANCE on US CITIZENS or fully unleashing a COMPUTER PROGRAM to make KILL DECISIONS

Didn’t they just come out and say 90% of AI simulated wars end in nuclear exchanges?

This tech is waaaaay too new to be giving kill authority to.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62558 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

Yeah seems bad. The surveillance implications are crazy, especially when we contemplate what some future administration might use it for.


While true, if you are relying on a company like Anthropic to ensure that won’t happen you are cooked.
Posted by DaveyJones12
Member since Dec 2022
335 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:09 pm to
Yeah for an AI using a nuke is a no brainer. What the frick is Pete smoking
Posted by bignuss18
Member since Sep 2025
806 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:54 pm to
Duplicate
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 7:56 pm
Posted by bignuss18
Member since Sep 2025
806 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:55 pm to
No, he doesn’t, just like how Tim Cook, Steve Wozniak, Linus Torvalds and Bill Gates don’t hate each other despite championing different products that achieve different scales of success. It is no different in the AI sphere
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39242 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

BREAKING: Sam Altman told OpenAI employees at an all-hands meeting on Friday afternoon that a potential agreement is emerging with the Department of War to use the startup’s AI models and tools, according to a source present at the meeting and a summary of the meeting seen by Fortune. The contract has not yet been signed.

The meeting came at the end of a week where a conflict between Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and OpenAI rival Anthropic burst into public acrimony, ending with the apparent end of Anthropic’s contracts with the Pentagon and with the federal government in general.

Altman said the government is willing to let OpenAI build their own “safety stack”—that is, the layered system of technical, policy, and human controls that sit between a powerful AI model and real-world use—and that if the model refuses to do a task, then the government would not force OpenAI to make it do that task.



Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


In essence Trump will agree to Antrhopic's terms, just with open AI instead, cause Hegseth is such a clown he bluffed and can’t back down but in essence they will?

Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
12709 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 8:24 pm to
I think Anthropic's desires to not be used in weapon systems or mass surveillance are laudable. However, the DoW doesn't have to do business with them. Furthermore, I am deeply concerned when the White House starts trying to compel private companies to do things under specious defense production justification.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram