- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kentaji cites "Black Codes" as precedent for what we should consider Consitutional
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:30 pm
She also struggles mightily with one of the most basic tenets of Constitutional law: That if something was Unconstitutional on its face, it was always Unconstitutional regardless of what a previous Court ruled.
This is the dumbest human that has ever been on the Court.
(Black Codes were blatantly racially discriminatory laws passed in Southern States right after the Civil War)
This is the dumbest human that has ever been on the Court.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. (Black Codes were blatantly racially discriminatory laws passed in Southern States right after the Civil War)
This post was edited on 1/20/26 at 3:31 pm
18
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:33 pm to Fun Bunch
jesus christ. the globalists running the illegitimate biden regime did their best to destroy this country
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:33 pm to Fun Bunch
that's a really unclear sound bite for/against makes no rational thought
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:34 pm to Fun Bunch
It's "New Law".
I've posted about this before.
We are in the Era of New Law.
I've posted about this before.
We are in the Era of New Law.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:34 pm to Fun Bunch
The left have no values or moral compass. Everything is a means to an end and the “end” is “greater power”.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:34 pm to Fun Bunch
Tried listening... stopped at "Let me stop you right there"... what a dumb, dumb woman.
Also, terribly fricking rude to lay out a question and cut off the answer like 7-10 words in.
I wonder how the other 8 sit through her buffoonery.
Also, terribly fricking rude to lay out a question and cut off the answer like 7-10 words in.
I wonder how the other 8 sit through her buffoonery.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:35 pm to Fun Bunch
This is what lawyers deal with in big city courtrooms across America
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:38 pm to Fun Bunch
Every Senator that approved this dingbat does not deserve to represent the people. Her confirmation hearings were a clown show and now we suffer through the ridiculousness that is Ketanji. Not Justice material. Not even close!
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:38 pm to Fun Bunch
Her problem is that she tries to be to sly when attacking concepts she doesn't like, and she's not quite smart enough to make it work. Like with the "I'm not a biologist" response at her confirmation hearings. What she's doing is trying to attack Bruen by bringing up something controversial to show why that part of Bruen is bad (to her). She just can't complete the argument at all and it comes off really bad.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:38 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Tried listening... stopped at "Let me stop you right there"... what a dumb, dumb woman.
Also, terribly fricking rude to lay out a question and cut off the answer like 7-10 words in.
I wonder how the other 8 sit through her buffoonery.
Ehhhhh that's kind of how Appellate practice is. You're up there arguing and getting cutoff from all sides. Its a tough practice but this is not unusual, its the norm
However someone being this dumb and routinely not understanding basic things is not usual at THIS level
This post was edited on 1/20/26 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What she's doing is trying to attack Bruen by bringing up something controversial to show why that part of Bruen is bad (to her). She just can't complete the argument at all and it comes off really bad
She's trying to argue that Bruen says we have to look at history as to what is constitutional, so she's bringing up blatant Unconstitutional legal history.
She is trying to be sly as you say but isn't smart enough to put it together, and isn't smart to understand that Black Codes were ALWAYS Unconstitutional, so they can never apply.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:41 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
She is trying to be sly as you say but isn't smart enough to put it together, and isn't smart to understand that Black Codes were ALWAYS Unconstitutional, so they can never apply.
This is where I disagree. I think she knows they were unconstitutional and that is the angle she's using to attack that prong of Bruen.
She just can't fully conceptualize/communicate the argument, only the attempted gotcha.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:18 pm to Fun Bunch
Now, now now, let’s not be too quick to dismiss this idea. If we roll it forward a bit her argument is basically we could carve out the second amendment and say Black people can’t own guns.
That would take care of 90% of gun violence in the US not bad
That would take care of 90% of gun violence in the US not bad
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:25 pm to Fun Bunch
She might be the worst DEI hire off all time.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:38 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:I could feel the majority of the court rolling their eyes, while she was speaking. I can only imagine what they say about her behind her back.
However someone being this dumb and routinely not understanding basic things is not usual at THIS level
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:40 pm to Fun Bunch
The shame is - she's become the opposite of what woke people promote.
She is not unlike dressing a hood-rat into a Supreme Court Justice robe and saying, 'You'll be able to do everything they can do'.
And when the left go out of their way to promote her - "First black, female Justice", everyone in the rest of the world have to bite their tongue... knowing just how ignorant she is... Her views and always, her dissenting opinions.
She is the parody of a parody.
She is not unlike dressing a hood-rat into a Supreme Court Justice robe and saying, 'You'll be able to do everything they can do'.
And when the left go out of their way to promote her - "First black, female Justice", everyone in the rest of the world have to bite their tongue... knowing just how ignorant she is... Her views and always, her dissenting opinions.
She is the parody of a parody.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:41 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
That would take care of 90% of gun violence in the US not bad
What percentage of gun violence comes from legal guns BTW?
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:41 pm to captainFid
quote:
She is the parody of a parity.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:43 pm to greygoose
SlowFlowPoo is even smarter than Ketanji. And that's saying something!
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:47 pm to ynlvr
quote:
Every Senator that approved this dingbat does not deserve to represent the people
They gave the constituents they represent exactly what they wanted. They did their jobs putting her on the bench, whether we like her or not.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News