- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
At what point do we say this isn’t “free speech” anymore?
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:17 pm
If one of us verbally assaulted a local LEO like this and harassed them they would cuff, taze, and jail us (and deserve it)
This is not free speech.
This is not free speech.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 5:39 pm
22
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:22 pm to burger bearcat
That’s disorderly conduct. Local police are responsible for enforcement. Good luck with that.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:23 pm to burger bearcat
The way his hand was shaking you could tell he was scared. All that big talk was fake tough guy crap.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:24 pm to burger bearcat
Even if you don’t agree with what the cops are doing, it’s pretty stupid to get in their face while they’re conducting official business.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:26 pm to burger bearcat
That’s probably one of the most debated and complicated Constitutional issues in the history of our great country. I personally certainly can understand why. My personal policy is if I don’t like what someone is saying, I bust them in the face.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:27 pm to burger bearcat
“I’ll f****ing die for this shite!”
Agent should’ve said “now’s as good of a time as any, ball’s in your court big mouth, make your move.”
Agent should’ve said “now’s as good of a time as any, ball’s in your court big mouth, make your move.”
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:33 pm to burger bearcat
We could arrest for disorderly conduct “language” in Texas. Like a traffic ticket, class C. Didn’t very often, but it would fit in during a lot of these protests.
Penal Code
Penal Code
This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:35 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
At what point do we say this isn’t “free speech” anymore?
We don't. Free speech is a MFer
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:36 pm to burger bearcat
Is there not a case to be made of obstruction. Force them to stand 100' away from the activity like the police have started doing.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:37 pm to burger bearcat
I think we are overlooking the part where it says we have the right to PEACEFULLY assemble. It doesn’t say assemble. It doesn’t say raise hell and assault others or commit other violent acts. If you can’t yell fire in a theatre, surely looting and burning property or engaging in physical assault isn’t covered either
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:50 pm to burger bearcat
Look at him shaking like a cuck
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:51 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
We don't. Free speech is a MFer
Not when it’s combined with aggressive behavior.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:52 pm to Rex Feral
quote:
That’s disorderly conduct.
The courts have ruled about a thousand times that it's not.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:54 pm to burger bearcat
fricking never. The constitution doesn’t give us free speech with conditions. Freedom, baby!
frick you if you want the government to limit our speech.
Now, if you want to make sure they don’t interfere, but still allow citizens to watch their government, I have no issue with that.
frick you if you want the government to limit our speech.
Now, if you want to make sure they don’t interfere, but still allow citizens to watch their government, I have no issue with that.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:54 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
The courts have ruled about a thousand times that it's not.
Facts and circumstances say otherwise.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:55 pm to burger bearcat
Liberal low IQ on full display.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 5:58 pm to SixthAndBarone
quote:
fricking never. The constitution doesn’t give us free speech with conditions. Freedom, baby! frick you if you want the government to limit our speech. Now, if you want to make sure they don’t interfere, but still allow citizens to watch their government, I have no issue with that.
I feel like most of the pothead libertarians have never actually read the writings and context around the bill of rights.
This is not at all what the founders would have considered “free speech”. This is verbal harassment and interference
Posted on 1/15/26 at 6:00 pm to burger bearcat
Calling speech harassment is a slippery slope. What if us republicans took to the street and the government said we were harassing?
Don’t get me wrong, this mob action of surrounding the cops and blocking them isn’t right. But you don’t end our freedom and CONSTITUTION RIGHT because of them.
If you aren’t for free speech, get the fawk out of America.
Don’t get me wrong, this mob action of surrounding the cops and blocking them isn’t right. But you don’t end our freedom and CONSTITUTION RIGHT because of them.
If you aren’t for free speech, get the fawk out of America.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 6:00 pm to burger bearcat
That type of speech is not protected by the first amendment. Those are fighting words, a face to face confrontation likely to provoke violence. That was way over the line. They should have arrested him.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 6:12 pm to SixthAndBarone
Can we do that with women going to the abortion clinic?
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News