Started By
Message

Slippery Slope - MN Shooting

Posted on 1/11/26 at 9:34 am
Posted by PalletJack
LA by birth, TX by choice
Member since Oct 2024
957 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 9:34 am
If the offender had not escalated the situation to the point of the officers opting to detain then she lives through it. If she had not moved on a path occupied by the detaining officers then she lives through it.

Any other result, besides the actual one, had to end with her in cuffs otherwise the law enforcement community is placed in serious danger. Disobeying orders and escalating cannot be allowed. Driving away once the crime is committed cannot be allowed. It’s a slippery slope to hold these officers at fault.

Piece of shite #1 who helped to embolden the crimina, Martha Raddatz


Piece of shite spin doctor who does not support law enforcement,Sen Tina Smith

Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
10669 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:00 am to
Did a federal law enforcement agent have the authority to arrest/detain Good for the crime she was committing? BEFORE you argue back, TELL US WHAT crime she was committing. Not what crime you think...tell us the specific crime and verify that the federal agent had the authority to enforce that crime.

Yes, she was being an arse. Yes, she is a lunatic. Yes, she shouldn't have been doing what she was doing. But BEFORE the shooting, the federal agent ordered her out of the car. Therefore, he must have had the power to arrest/detain her for a crime he's allowed to enforce. What was it?
Posted by L5ut1g3r
Member since Mar 2019
1503 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:02 am to
Impeding a federal law enforcement officer dumbass!
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14474 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:03 am to
Obstruction
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
19524 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:04 am to
quote:

SixthAndBarone


You are pure filth. Firstly, if a law enforcement officer gives you a lawful command, like stop, you must comply.

Defending the actions of this lunatic woman shows how mentally ill the left has become.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
31761 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:04 am to
quote:

he must have had the power to arrest/detain her for a crime he's allowed to enforce. What was it?
ICE DOES have arrest powers

One crime was obstruction of justice
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
10669 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:06 am to
quote:


Obstruction


Explain in legal terms.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135967 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Yes, she was being an arse. Yes, she is a lunatic. Yes, she shouldn't have been doing what she was doing. But BEFORE the shooting, the federal agent ordered her out of the car. Therefore, he must have had the power to arrest/detain her for a crime he's allowed to enforce. What was it?
Obstruction of justice or interference with law enforcement, which are criminal offenses federal officers can enforce. ICE agents can detain individuals when they have reasonable suspicion or probable cause that a federal offense is occurring in connection with their duties.
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
10669 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:

ICE DOES have arrest powers

One crime was obstruction of justice


Yes, they have arrest powers for CERTAIN crimes. So what crime was she committing? Give us the legal definition of "obstruction of justice".
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135967 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Explain in legal terms.
Interference with law-enforcement or law-enforcement activities.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
6467 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Explain in legal terms.

quote:

18 U.S. Code § 111 - Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees

U.S. Code
Notes

prev | next
(a) In General.—Whoever—
(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designated in section 1114 of this title while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties; or
(2) forcibly assaults or intimidates any person who formerly served as a person designated in section 1114 on account of the performance of official duties during such person’s term of service,
shall, where the acts in violation of this section constitute only simple assault, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both, and where such acts involve physical contact with the victim of that assault or the intent to commit another felony, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
(b) Enhanced Penalty.—
Whoever, in the commission of any acts described in subsection (a), uses a deadly or dangerous weapon (including a weapon intended to cause death or danger but that fails to do so by reason of a defective component) or inflicts bodily injury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(c) Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.—
There is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by this section.



Section 1114
quote:

(a) In General.—Whoever kills or attempts to kill any officer or employee of the United States or of any agency in any branch of the United States Government (including any member of the uniformed services) while such officer or employee is engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties, or any person assisting such an officer or employee in the performance of such duties or on account of that assistance, shall be punished—
(1) in the case of murder, as provided under section 1111;
(2) in the case of manslaughter, as provided under section 1112; or
(3) in the case of attempted murder or manslaughter, as provided in section 1113.
(b) Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.—
There is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by this section.

This post was edited on 1/11/26 at 10:10 am
Posted by Victor R Franko
Member since Dec 2021
2426 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:09 am to
This is some type of talking point being put out across the interwebs. Been seeing the same bs from multiple drive by posters. Don't waste your efforts.
Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
913 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:09 am to
This is worth watching. It is related to this subject. It gives you some idea of the perspective of the LEO. Some times his choice is between shooting or waiting to see if he is still alive. What would you do?

LINK

It's a video of a black activist who went through LEO gun training. It's about 5 minutes, the first 1:30 or so makes the best point
This post was edited on 1/11/26 at 10:11 am
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5361 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Explain in legal terms.


Obstruction. Getting in the way. Interfering., Like parking your car in the middle of the street at 90 degrees from normal traffic flow. Someone owes the dumb bitch's heirs a refund for her anti-ICE class.


Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14474 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Explain in legal terms.


quote:

Obstruction of a federal officer in their duty is a serious federal felony offense, primarily prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 111, which addresses assault, resistance, or impediment of federal officers, and various other statutes within Chapter 73 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which cover a wide range of obstruction of justice acts.


The suv stopped in The middle of the road to purposefully block a federal vehicle in the function of the duty.

The suv was there for over 3 minutes blaring their horn and yelling at federal officers. This was no accident or being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
2007 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Raddatz was born in Idaho Falls, Idaho,[1][2] to Edward Dustin Raddatz and Doris Elaine (née Anderson).[3][4] Her family later moved to Salt Lake City. She attended the University of Utah but dropped out to work at a local station.[5] Raddatz is Jewish.
Posted by IndianPower
Louisiana
Member since May 2021
1482 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:20 am to
You will never get it will you?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135967 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:21 am to
quote:

So what crime was she committing?
Any other questions?
Posted by LSU7096
Member since May 2004
2965 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:25 am to
She didn't care for her biological children. She was a toxic liberal piece of sh!t.

She wanted to obstruct justice them attempted to flee with aLEO in her path. She hit a LEO who had previously been struck and drug by an criminal requiring medical treatment.

Classic FAFO. If Michael Byrd had probable cause to murder Ashli Babbitt then this officer has 10x more justification.
This post was edited on 1/11/26 at 2:07 pm
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24025 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Did a federal law enforcement agent have the authority to arrest/detain Good for the crime she was committing?


In a word. Yes. She was obstructing a federal officer in the line of his or her duty.

Covered by 18 U.S.C. § 111 and yes as federal law enforcement officers they are well within the power of their duties to arrest the person violating the law.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram