Started By
Message

If our government capped auto financing at 60 months would car prices come down?

Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:42 am
Posted by tigereye58
Member since Jan 2007
2813 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:42 am
Similar to home loans offered at 30 years max

Read an article this morning about how car prices went up bc Americans wanted more “features” and showed an appetite to pay more.

I think prices went up for other reasons (Obama and Biden epa then Covid) and some Americans showed an appetite to finance for 72 to 84 months but the result is a generation that is upside down on every car.

I think prices drop dramatically if Trump ends epa standards and caps financing at 60 months. The 90k Tahoe will be 60k again.

Btw I’m not against people paying high prices for luxury cars. But when I was in school and Johnnys dad drove a Porsche that was 90k it was cool bc Johnnys dad had worked hard for cool stuff. Now Susie’s mom drives a 90k Tahoe bc GM will finance it for 84 months.
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
1811 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:45 am to
Maybe the government can limit the price of cars? Or decide what everyone can buy.

Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80163 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:46 am to
Trump recently killed a bunch of fed mandates that would have kept car costs rising.

This should help quite a bit.
Posted by Iron Lion
Romulus
Member since Nov 2014
13747 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:48 am to
It's not the government's responsibility to keep stupid people from doing stupid things
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
14834 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Maybe the government can limit the price of cars? Or decide what everyone can buy.


They certainly helped INCREASE the price of cars. Also tried to decide what people can buy by setting quotas for EVs.
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23493 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:51 am to
Government should just set the price of all cars. That would really bring prices down.

Good grief.
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
56702 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:53 am to
Yep because car sales would go down. They should can’t at 48 months and they would go way down.
Posted by Bonkers119
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
11686 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:55 am to
Good luck finding Americans that can afford a $850+ dollar note ($50,000/60 months) every month.

This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 10:56 am
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2859 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:57 am to
quote:


It's not the government's responsibility to keep stupid people from doing stupid things


That's exactly what our government tries to do. It's why we have seatbelt laws, speed limits, open container laws, legal drinking/smoking ages etc.

Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
3632 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:58 am to
I was thinking along those lines late last night.

2 things:

1: If you financed your car, the longest you could mortgage that thing would be for 36 months, that would cause people to buy less expensive vehicles.

2: If a manufacturer designed a vehicle that you could screw on a new fender or simply lift out the radiator that would cause a lot of cheaper and quicker fixits. Simpler functions such as heating and defrosting channels like the old 70s Toyota Land Cruisers had, would be a perfect set of wheels.

Less electronics. Radio, GPS and Phone could be bought and simply plugged in to the cigarette lighter plug.
Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
41614 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:59 am to
God bless The Donald
Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
391 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:02 am to
quote:

If our government_______
Whatever verb you insert here will create more problems.
Posted by tigereye58
Member since Jan 2007
2813 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:03 am to
quote:

It's not the government's responsibility to keep stupid people from doing stupid things


You can’t possibly be serious. The government prevents people from doing stupid things all day long. Society has to have some regulation to be sustainable. Speed limit signs, basic food quality standards, I get it that the government over reaches all the time too but a civil debate over where our government benefits society is realistic for a political message board. I’m all about keeping the government out of my life but also not naive or stupid enough to think a country with 350 million people is sustainable without some basic oversight.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62605 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:05 am to
quote:

It's not the government's responsibility to keep stupid people from doing stupid things
This. No government has ever been successful converting the irresponsible into the responsible.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297134 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:07 am to
quote:



You can’t possibly be serious. The government prevents people from doing stupid things all day long.


Yes, the government has done a great job of preventing stealing and drug use. Good point.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62091 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Maybe the government can limit the price of cars? Or decide what everyone can buy.



Right.

Why not go all the way to the left?

Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
391 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:17 am to
quote:

a country with 350 million people is sustainable without some basic oversight.
I do not think this is the argument at hand. Asking the government to create laws about auto financing is ridiculous when they defiantly will not even create laws that prevent themselves from becoming multi-millionaires through insider trading.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16313 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Good luck finding Americans that can afford a $850+ dollar note ($50,000/60 months) every month.


Then maybe Victoria doesn’t need the Yukon Denali XL to carry Brayllyn to her private cheer lessons and Braxxton to travel ball.

If you cannot pay a 50000 dollar loan in 60 months, you don’t need a 50k vehicle. And yes I know a Yukon Denali XL is more than 50000 dollars new. But the same people that say they cannot afford a 60 month 50,000 are the same people that will jump on a 90,000 dollar 96 month loan,
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
100559 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:20 am to
Buying a new car is a terrible purchase.

Cars these days are made to top 200k miles easily and anything under 80k miles that was maintained properly is basically like new. I buy used with under 40k miles never finance longer than 4-5 years , and am never upside down on it. I’ll usually have it paid for before I need a new one as I keep a truck for 6-8 years or 175k miles whichever comes first. Trade in, add another 10-15% down payment on top of trade in and finance the remainder.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46208 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:23 am to
Today, the AVERAGE car loan term for both new and USED vehicles is approaching 6 years. In 2000, it was 5. In 1990, it was 4.5 years. In 1980, it was only 3. 175K in depreciating iron sitting in the driveway of the forever home you slapped a 30 year mortgage on when you were in your 40's.

The middle class is playing with fire when it comes to debt, and no one is talking about it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram