- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

So is the woman going to be held accountable too?
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:41 pm
She had a part in this just as much as he did. Knew he was married and still wrecked his house. Is she still employed by UM? I guess the only major issue here is Sherrone went (possibly) psychotic about it, but that is still TBD as we have yet to hear his side and see what he has on her.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:42 pm to Contra
She's morally wrong, but she's technically the victim in the eyes of the State. She will likely sue.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:42 pm to Contra
Good luck with that narrative. She's gonna get a lawyer and have generational wealth
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:42 pm to Contra
No, probably not, brosef.
Why? Did you think the U would punish the pregnant young pretty white girl?
Why? Did you think the U would punish the pregnant young pretty white girl?
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:45 pm to Contra
She's going to be too busy rolling in big money to be worried about accountability.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:49 pm to Contra
Two adults screwing ?
What's the charge ?
She's being dragged on the internet as a whore, that's her punishment.
And then Michigan will end up paying her 5-10 million for mental anguish
What's the charge ?
She's being dragged on the internet as a whore, that's her punishment.
And then Michigan will end up paying her 5-10 million for mental anguish
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:53 pm to Contra
She’s a home wrecking whore, but Moore is the star of the show.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:56 pm to Contra
You shouldn’t screw a married man. Full stop
But he’s the football coach at Michigan’s making $5.5 dollars.
And she’s a 20 something year old assistant making $50k. I think her being dragged on the internet as a whore and threatened to be killed should suffice for now
But he’s the football coach at Michigan’s making $5.5 dollars.
And she’s a 20 something year old assistant making $50k. I think her being dragged on the internet as a whore and threatened to be killed should suffice for now
Posted on 12/11/25 at 2:05 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
And she’s a 20 something year old assistant making $50k. I think her being dragged on the internet as a whore and threatened to be killed should suffice for now
Wrong. Shes like 30 or 31 years old.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 2:17 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
but she's technically the victim in the eyes of the State.
lol she’s not a victim. She was a willing participant until she wasn’t.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 2:18 pm to Contra
quote:
She had a part in this just as much as he did.
Did she stalk him, assault him, and threaten to kill him?
You must know something nobody else does.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 2:21 pm to Contra
She’s a subordinate employee, sexual harassment laws were written with this scenario in mind
Not saying she’s blameless of course
Not saying she’s blameless of course
Posted on 12/11/25 at 2:36 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
lol she’s not a victim. She was a willing participant until she wasn’t.
He raised her salary to get or keep in her pants, or to keep her quiet.
Then allegedly stalked her, and eventually allegedly broke into her house and threatened to pull a murder/suicide.
Seems like a victim to me.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 2:46 pm to Contra
so… a White girl getting money from a black man??
Posted on 12/11/25 at 2:48 pm to Friendly Satan
she won't sue because they'll settle prior because it's a slam dunk.
in the eyes of the law, she's not a 'willing participant' since he's basically her boss.
in the eyes of the law, she's not a 'willing participant' since he's basically her boss.
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 12/11/25 at 3:19 pm to Contra
Before I started my first serious job after college, my father sat me down and told me:
“Don’t get your meat where you get your bread!” I snickered and he gave me “that look” and said “I’m not joking…. You’ll thank me later”
It’s amazing, but the older I get, the smarter my parents get….
“Don’t get your meat where you get your bread!” I snickered and he gave me “that look” and said “I’m not joking…. You’ll thank me later”
It’s amazing, but the older I get, the smarter my parents get….
Posted on 12/11/25 at 3:55 pm to Clashmore Mike
I've made it a point over the years to never get involved with anyone I worked with. Way too much that can go wrong.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 4:01 pm to FightinTigersDammit
Exactly. Unless she’s “that one” the relationship will end eventually and then everyday you have to see them… why complicate your life needlessly, life is complicated enough!
Posted on 12/11/25 at 4:49 pm to Contra
It depends on the restriction that was violated. Most companies have policies about having relationships with people whom you supervise. In that case, unless the company has a strict no-fraternization policy, only the person higher in the chain of command will get in trouble.
Popular
Back to top

14










