Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

How a hydroelectric plant wrecked the ORCC plan

Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:12 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56835 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:12 pm
This is written by Kelly Williams. He is the retired President of Mississippi Chemical.

quote:


Hans (Einstein) was not as famous as his father. But he was the world expert on river sediments. He advised the Corps of Engineers (Corps) on the design of the Old River Control Complex (ORCC) in the 1950s. He thought the Corps would take his advice. He was wrong.

The Corps built the ORCC to keep the Mississippi River from changing course down the Atchafalaya River. It’s about 50 miles upstream from Baton Rouge. It controls the Mississippi’s flow and diverts 23% to the Atchafalaya as ordered by Congress (1954 Flood Control Act) and thence straight to the Gulf near Morgan City. It leaves the remaining 77% in the main channel to meander to the Gulf at New Orleans.

Hans knew the natural law of sediment transport concentrates sediments in a meandering river when part of its flow is diverted. And that the concentrated sediments would fall out, clog the channel, create a bottleneck, and slow the Mississippi’s flow to the Gulf. And that this would cause higher and longer floods upstream.

He sought to minimize these effects by the careful design of the ORCC and by siting it to divert flow from the river’s sediment-rich strata. He was right about the design and the siting. Sedimentation was negligible for 27 years from 1963 when ORCC started up to 1990. Then the Corps ignored his advice and the natural law of sedimentation to collaborate on a hydroelectric power plant.

Private investors built the plant and made a deal with the Corps to put it just upstream of the ORCC and for the Corps to send sediment-lean flow through its turbines to the Atchafalaya instead of the sediment-rich flow it had sent through the ORCC. Han’s couldn’t know this would happen.
But he could have predicted the result: sediments concentrated in the river’s main channel, fell out, clogged it just below ORCC, and slowed its discharge to the Gulf. The river rose, floods got higher and much longer inside the levees with little or no increase in rainfall.

In 2015 there was a step-change increase in flood duration. The increase became obvious to landowners inside the levees in 2016. Floods were 2-3 times longer in the five years after 2015 vs before. There was no increase in the frequency of floods (rainfall events).

The Corps knew that sediments were increasing in 2005 when it made the first measurement of the river channel after the power plant began operating. By 2015 Corps measurements showed the channel width had shrunk by 50% and the channel depth, by 33%. The Corps knew this was happening and that it would continue and make floods ever higher and longer .

But the Mississippi River Commission (MRC) generals told Mississippi’s Secretary of State, other landowners, and me the flooding was due to more rain when we testified about flood damage in 2016-17. No mention of sediments. We didn’t learn that sediments were the cause until 2018. Why did the Generals hide the real cause?

The Corps deal with the power plant is a liability and an embarrassment. The Generals may have been ordered to hide it. The Corps is supposed to control floods and mitigate flood damage. Its deal with the power plant makes both worse.

The Corps has a Memo of Understanding (MOU) with the company that owns the plant. It requires the Corps to send sediment lean flow to the plant. It also requires the owner of the plant to dredge sediments the plant causes. The company doesn’t dredge. The Corps doesn’t enforce the MOU or dredge the sediments itself. It seems strangely indifferent to the consequences of its decisions.

We learned the real cause of the floods after LSU’s Dr. Xu published a report in late 2017 based on changes in Corps morphology measurements (channel dimensions) cited above. It showed that sediments had clogged the channel below ORCC and made it much smaller (bottleneck) since 1990. He said the bottleneck would cause the river to rise and change course in a big flood.

In 2019, the Corps published a little-noticed updated flow line study. It predicts hundreds of miles of levees from Greenville to New Orleans will overtop in a big flood. The last time that happened was the great flood of 1927.

Reality has confirmed that Dr. Einstein was right about Nature’s sediment transport law and the consequences of violating it. And that he was wrong to think the Corps would obey it. So disaster looms ever sooner as a result of Corps decisions — which seem inconsistent with the mission Congress gave it (1928 Flood Control Act): don’t let another 1927 flood happen. It looks like Corps’ decisions are leading to another great flood.

Who made the decisions about the power plant? And the decision not to dredge the sediments, and the decision not to build a relief structure to take the top off of floods, and the decision not to tell landowners inside the levees the cause of their flooding, and the decision not to warn landowners outside the levees about the increasing risk and inevitability of levees overtopping. The Corps is a bureaucracy subordinate to other
bureaucracies and to Congress. Authority and responsibility are diffuse. No one takes responsibility for bad decisions. No one is solely to blame for the flooding inside the levees and the coming flood disaster outside the levees. The buck doesn’t stop with the Mississippi River Commission Generals. They follow orders too. It seems the buck doesn’t stop anywhere. That’s the problem.

We don’t know the names of the Generals, politicians, and bureaucrats who made the decisions now. But we will learn them after the levees overtop.
This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 12:16 pm
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
31485 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:28 pm to
What's the original source for this? I c/p the first two paragraphs and see it's covered, word for word, on a handful of different sites.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
71405 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:29 pm to


A decent read:
America's Achilles' Heel: the Mississippi River's Old River Control Structure
This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 12:31 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56835 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:45 pm to
It's a syndicated column. He sent it to me personally.
Posted by TigersnJeeps
FL Panhandle
Member since Jan 2021
2635 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:12 pm to
i am sure there will be a series of studies and Blue Ribbon Commissions to study this issue....

Sounds pretty ominous on impacts....
Posted by Defenseiskey
Houston, TX
Member since Nov 2010
1670 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:18 pm to
That Hydro Plant was part of my sales territory when I was still in Louisiana. They're owned by Brookfield Rebewable now. I think the city of Vidalia owns part if it too.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57831 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:41 pm to

quote:

i am sure there will be a series of studies and Blue Ribbon Commissions to study this issue....


And then a couple of studies to study the studies, and by then the original studies will be out of date so there will need to be new studies, then new studies to study those studies, and by then the original studies... etc.
Posted by man in the stadium
Member since Aug 2006
1441 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:49 pm to
Link to study mentioned in article for the nerds.
This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 1:50 pm
Posted by terriblegreen
Souf Badden Rewage
Member since Aug 2011
11873 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 2:00 pm to
I worked at the plant right out of college in the 90s. Part of our responsibilities were to monitor sediment in all of the channels, which we did daily and is still going on to this day. There are multiple pump houses on both sides of each channel to monitor sediment going in and sediment going out. These records go back to when the plant came on line. Additionally, the plant is required to survey the river from the plant past ORCC. This is done by zig-zagging the river to record depths.

Sediment indeed does build up in all channels and the river. I never saw it dredged, but they do flush the channels out by opening the gates and reducing flow at the plant. This flushes a great deal of sediment out.

To the point of this article, the Corps is aware of any sediment build ups. It's not going to sneak up on them. They just need to "fix" the areas where it does build up.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
72722 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 2:19 pm to
The MRC has got the dirt on their concessionaire and is sandbagging to avoid a flood of legal bills.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56835 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 2:50 pm to
And the final study will have to be submitted to the feasibility committee for review.
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8128 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

To the point of this article, the Corps is aware of any sediment build ups. It's not going to sneak up on them. They just need to "fix" the areas where it does build up.


I think the point is the rest of the river downstream of the ORCS. Prior to the dam, the portion that was diverted was sediment rich. Now all that sediments goes down river.
Posted by Bigfishchoupique
Member since Jul 2017
9456 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 5:25 pm to
You can look at Google satellite and see the Main Channel filling up from Angola heading North.

The river is going to blow through the ORCS or Widow Graham Bend. That’s the bend North of the structure and across from the Red River Wildlife Management headquarters. It’s going to happen.

In 1973 I was on the ORCS and felt it shaking. It almost blew then. Mr Simoneaux was the operator for the structure.

He asked if we had ever heard of Murphy’s Law. He pointed to the structure and said Murphy lives here.

It’s going to blow. It’s called river avulsion.
This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 5:28 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56835 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 9:30 pm to
Yikes.
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
60301 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 2:01 am to
quote:

In 1973 I was on the ORCS and felt it shaking. It almost blew then.
Yes. It was humming and moving. Dad and I believe General Stroud, (have to verify my memory) were out there almost daily during that time. I was out there a few times as a kid tagging along.

Massive sand boils along the levee had to have chimneys made of sand bags built around them until the pressure would stop further water action under the levees. Very interesting hydraulics.

Heroic effort was put in to fill hole that the river was making to tunnel under the structure. Plus the building of miles of mud-boxes to temporarily raise the top of the levee.

If the levees aren’t raised or the dredging initiated, they will be over topped.
Posted by RovinBengal
Boston
Member since Jun 2014
205 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 3:18 am to
Interesting always wondered about this.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
11440 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 4:19 am to
quote:

And then a couple of studies to study the studies, and by then the original studies will be out of date so there will need to be new studies, then new studies to study those studies, and by then the original studies... etc.


Write enough academic fear porn for 30 years and retire from academia with a retirement and work in the private sector a few more. You can retire and not have to worry about the Mississippi River changing course from your condo in Hawaii.
Posted by TigerV
Member since Feb 2007
2832 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 5:49 am to
quote:

Sediment indeed does build up in all channels and the river. I never saw it dredged, but they do flush the channels out by opening the gates and reducing flow at the plant. This flushes a great deal of sediment out.


Flushing is literally kicking the can down the road, except there would be no ability to kick the can again once the sediment settles at the next few turns. The structures themselves are by nature increasing the sediment load by reducing the water and the carrying capacity of the river. Both the Core and power plant should have to pay to begin the dredging and getting it cleaned out as the contract, but we all know that won’t happen.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
72722 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:01 am to
quote:

You can retire and not have to worry about the Mississippi River changing course from your condo in Hawaii.
I’d recommend not retiring to the south end of Hawaii (the big island).

(Admittedly NOT a Geologist or Hydrological Scientist)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram