Started By
Message

Senate Republican: ‘We can’t afford’ $2,000 tariff checks

Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:04 pm
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27261 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:04 pm
quote:

Republican Sen. Ron Johnson (Wis.), a leading fiscal hawk in the Senate, says the country “can’t afford” President Trump’s proposal to send out $2,000 tariff “dividend” checks to working-class Americans to help them afford higher living expenses.

“Look, we can’t afford it. I wish we were in a position to return the American public their money, but we’re not,” Johnson told Fox Business’s Maria Bartiromo.

“We’ll have at least a $2 trillion deficit this year,” Johnson warned, comparing the staggering national deficit projected for 2025 to smaller deficits under former President Obama and during Trump’s first term.

“President Trump had deficits about $800 billion. Obama, in his last four years, $550 billion a year. Now we’re $2 trillion? Completely unacceptable. We have to start focusing on that and doing something about it,” Johnson said.

Trump has proposed paying out $2,000 tariff dividend checks to millions of Americans and funding it with the hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue projected to enter federal coffers because of higher tariffs.

But budget experts project the inflow of new tariff revenue won’t be enough to cover the costs of doling out $2,000 checks, which could cost $600 billion per year, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group that studies fiscal issues.


quote:

Distributing $2,000 tariff rebates to millions of Americans would cost approximately $6 trillion over 10 years, if those checks are sent out on an annual basis.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier this month that the administration would limit those payments to people making below a certain amount in annual income.

Trump said the checks would go to “individuals of moderate income,” likely “in the middle of next year.”

Congress would need to pass legislation to authorize the payments.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters last week that he would like to see the increased tariff revenue used to reduce the deficit.


LINK
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
18727 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:04 pm to
They can afford billions to israel
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32392 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:06 pm to
Is he wrong?
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
59309 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:07 pm to
He’s right. It should have NEVER been mentioned.
Posted by Bamafig
Member since Nov 2018
5759 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:08 pm to
Neither party will ever pay down the debt. Some will add more (D), and some (R) add less.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61758 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Is he wrong?



No

But, he's a hypocrite.

There's been no movement to decrease the deficit.
Posted by aubie101
Russia
Member since Nov 2010
3578 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Is he wrong?


No, he is correct, But I wish they would get this concerned when sending Ukraine or Israel money. But that is different.
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 3:17 pm
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14362 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:09 pm to
i don't want a general "rebate check" given out


but, if they want to reduce taxes by the amount of tariff revenue to those of us paying taxes, then i am for it.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74783 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:10 pm to
$38T in debt to the private western central banking clan (aka the Federal Reserve) and if we start to talk about stuff we can't afford, we'll be here all day.
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
19047 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:11 pm to
We technically can't afford anything, but that doesn't stop those assclowns from spending.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
9724 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

We can’t afford






Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170457 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:14 pm to
quote:


i don't want a general "rebate check" given out


but, if they want to reduce taxes by the amount of tariff revenue to those of us paying taxes, then i am for it.

The problem is that the tariff revenue isn't even enough to cover the "rebate" checks or whatever you would want to call them
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62492 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Some will add more (D), and some (R) add less.
Even this is in doubt at this point.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3482 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Some will add more (D), and some (R) add less.

It's like brainwashing.

The article literally says:

"President Trump had deficits about $800 billion. Obama, in his last four years, $550 billion a year."

$800 billion (R) > $550 billion (D)

But you can't even see it due to your bias. Remarkable.
Posted by JellyRoll
Member since Apr 2024
1409 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:17 pm to
He's right and no one should be getting a 2000.00 handout.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
91069 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Republican Sen. Ron Johnson (Wis.), a leading fiscal hawk in the Senate, says the country “can’t afford” President Trump’s proposal to send out $2,000 tariff “dividend” checks to working-class Americans to help them afford higher living expenses.


frick.

YOU.



you can afford to fund transgender surgery in cambodia and give billions of dollars to terrorists in countries who fricking hate us though????

i dont even know if i would qualify but i have ZERO problem with money going back to US taxpayers.

frick ALL OF THESE POLITICIANS WHO SPEND OUR MONEY LIKE A DRUNKEN WHORE IN EVERY COUNTRY ON EARTH BUT OURS
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170457 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:17 pm to
When both parties are so bad about not giving a shite about fiscal issues it probably isn't worth fighting over who is slightly worse
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
13121 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:17 pm to
3.3 billion, almost all of which they turned around and spent with American arms manufacturers.
quote:

The data shows that Ethiopia received the most aid—almost $1.7 billion—after Ukraine ($16B) in the 2023 fiscal year.

More than $1 billion was also disbursed by USAID in Jordan, Afghanistan and Somalia. Congo, Syria, Nigeria, Yemen and South Sudan also received between $740 million and $936 million in aid.

You tards never mention any other country that gets money. No mention of the millions in tranny comics for South America, the billions dumped on countries engaged in civil wars, or the billions of dollars of shite we left to the Taliban. But yea, Israel is responsible for our trillions of dollars in debt.
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 1:18 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56184 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

But you can't even see it due to your bias. Remarkable.


Trump probably loses the analysis, but if you want to have a fair comparison you should look at the percentage increase over the immediate prior budget. Obama hasn’t been president for a long time.
Posted by Fuzzy Dunlop
Member since Mar 2025
247 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:18 pm to
Now he's worried about the debt all of a sudden?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram