Started By
Message

LA officials soon to be able to sue citizens over internet posts with their personal info

Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:56 am
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
37676 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:56 am
In an effort to reduce the risk of potential violence against many Louisiana government officials.
quote:

BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana Illuminator) - Starting next year, hundreds of Louisiana officials will be able to sue private citizens, businesses and government entities for not removing their basic biographical information from the internet.

Gov. Jeff Landry and state lawmakers approved a new law earlier this year allowing a wide swath of public officials to bring lawsuits against those who don’t take down online posts with officials’ personal-identifying information when they request it.

Anyone who doesn’t take the information off social media or websites could also face criminal penalties under the new law, including up to 90 days in prison and a fine of up to $1,000 per violation.

States across the country have approved similar laws in recent years after a handful of high-profile attacks on judges and other politicians. By shielding their personal information from the public, government officials hope to reduce their risk to political violence.

quote:

But Louisiana’s version is more sweeping than almost all other states’ laws. It will entitle a wider range of elected officials to sue over internet posts for more reasons, according to a review of dozens of states’ privacy laws.

Government transparency advocates said Louisiana’s law will infringe on citizens’ First Amendment rights and lead to frivolous lawsuits. Attorney Scott Sternberg described the new law as “wildly unconstitutional” in a memo he wrote on behalf of the Louisiana Press Association earlier this year.

“Effectively, the Louisiana Legislature has decided to criminalize the publication of a church birthday calendar, the mortgage documents required by federal law, birth announcements, engagement party RSVP websites and traffic tickets,” he wrote.

“This law will undoubtedly lead to more litigation, higher costs for public and private entities, and a chilling effect on speech,” Sternberg said.

LINK
Posted by TheOcean
#honeyfriedchicken
Member since Aug 2004
45073 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:59 am to
Chicken, time to rally your fellow OT lawyers. Let's go to war
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31264 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:01 am to
I mean, posting Jeff Landrys mom’s address is not okay. Posting that Jeff Landry is an idiot that’s ruining LSU football and has been a complete disappointment thus far is completely fair game.
Posted by ImJustaBoy
Member since Oct 2023
1853 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:05 am to
quote:

I mean, posting Jeff Landrys mom’s address

Then don’t make assessors office information public. This will get overturned by the supreme court one day and will cost tax payers millions for a settlement. Does Jeff think he’s more powerful than the 1st amendment?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
37676 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:08 am to
Agree. I haven’t read the specifics of the law. But I wonder if posting a link or giving directions on the Internet on how to get to the official’s publicly available information would be lawful. The answer better be yes.

I suppose a few people will try it out as it does say it only has to be removed if the official sends written notice that it has to be removed
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
17298 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Jeff Landrys mom’s address is not okay.


Wow, I thought he was motherless.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
147910 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:26 am to
quote:

and lead to frivolous lawsuits.

quote:

This law will undoubtedly lead to more litigation
authentically Louisiana
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
133009 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:29 am to
And so, to get around this, you parody and satirize them
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
19037 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:30 am to
quote:

This law will undoubtedly lead to more litigation
authentically Louisiana


Gotta stimulate the economy. Lawyers need a raise.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
14354 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:59 am to
Public information is still public…. Regardless of how or by whom it’s disseminated.. feeling they need special treatment is nothing new for public officials but without breaking existing laws.. this will only benefit lawyers and eventually will cost the taxpayers..
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
9536 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:00 am to
I'm ok with making doxxing a crime
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
9536 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Wow, I thought he was motherless.


Posted by holmesbr
Baton Rouge, La.
Member since Feb 2012
3860 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:13 am to
quote:

sends written notice that it has to be removed


How long before a written notice is hand delivered by a swat team in the middle of the night?
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10671 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:19 am to
Bunch of fricking tyrant bitches. In addition to this, limits on public records law, limits on the ability of citizens to record the police in public.

I swear, a large swath of the United States population would be more comfortable in North Korea than the USA.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57700 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Public information is still public…. Regardless of how or by whom it’s disseminated.. feeling they need special treatment is nothing new for public officials but without breaking existing laws.. this will only benefit lawyers and eventually will cost the taxpayers..


Agreed. Part of the tradeoff for being elected is that all of your information is supposed to be public. Your street address is needed for pay stubs, insurance, etc. and thus is publicly available information. It's not much different from the old days where someone's address was listed between their name and phone number in the phone book.



Some companies allowed you to opt-out your address, for others it was a paid service, but the default in the US was usually that it was present.
Posted by Pepe Lepew
Looney tuned .....
Member since Oct 2008
37824 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:22 am to
Screw them…
Posted by jaytothen
Member since Jan 2020
8242 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Does Jeff think he’s more powerful than the 1st amendment?


Yes
Posted by StanSmith
Member since May 2018
1061 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:40 am to
Her address is already well known. It is a very successful brothel.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
11065 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:44 am to
Does this not apply for citizens who haven't been elected to something?

One law for thee, another for me.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17010 posts
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:45 am to
Does that mean that if a politician gets arrested for something like a DUI/Disorderly Conduct, they can sue to not have their name released?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram