- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LA officials soon to be able to sue citizens over internet posts with their personal info
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:56 am
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:56 am
In an effort to reduce the risk of potential violence against many Louisiana government officials.
LINK
quote:
BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana Illuminator) - Starting next year, hundreds of Louisiana officials will be able to sue private citizens, businesses and government entities for not removing their basic biographical information from the internet.
Gov. Jeff Landry and state lawmakers approved a new law earlier this year allowing a wide swath of public officials to bring lawsuits against those who don’t take down online posts with officials’ personal-identifying information when they request it.
Anyone who doesn’t take the information off social media or websites could also face criminal penalties under the new law, including up to 90 days in prison and a fine of up to $1,000 per violation.
States across the country have approved similar laws in recent years after a handful of high-profile attacks on judges and other politicians. By shielding their personal information from the public, government officials hope to reduce their risk to political violence.
quote:
But Louisiana’s version is more sweeping than almost all other states’ laws. It will entitle a wider range of elected officials to sue over internet posts for more reasons, according to a review of dozens of states’ privacy laws.
Government transparency advocates said Louisiana’s law will infringe on citizens’ First Amendment rights and lead to frivolous lawsuits. Attorney Scott Sternberg described the new law as “wildly unconstitutional” in a memo he wrote on behalf of the Louisiana Press Association earlier this year.
“Effectively, the Louisiana Legislature has decided to criminalize the publication of a church birthday calendar, the mortgage documents required by federal law, birth announcements, engagement party RSVP websites and traffic tickets,” he wrote.
“This law will undoubtedly lead to more litigation, higher costs for public and private entities, and a chilling effect on speech,” Sternberg said.
LINK
Posted on 11/21/25 at 7:59 am to LSUTANGERINE
Chicken, time to rally your fellow OT lawyers. Let's go to war
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:01 am to LSUTANGERINE
I mean, posting Jeff Landrys mom’s address is not okay. Posting that Jeff Landry is an idiot that’s ruining LSU football and has been a complete disappointment thus far is completely fair game.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:05 am to elprez00
quote:
I mean, posting Jeff Landrys mom’s address
Then don’t make assessors office information public. This will get overturned by the supreme court one day and will cost tax payers millions for a settlement. Does Jeff think he’s more powerful than the 1st amendment?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:08 am to ImJustaBoy
Agree. I haven’t read the specifics of the law. But I wonder if posting a link or giving directions on the Internet on how to get to the official’s publicly available information would be lawful. The answer better be yes.
I suppose a few people will try it out as it does say it only has to be removed if the official sends written notice that it has to be removed
I suppose a few people will try it out as it does say it only has to be removed if the official sends written notice that it has to be removed
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:16 am to elprez00
quote:
Jeff Landrys mom’s address is not okay.
Wow, I thought he was motherless.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:26 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
and lead to frivolous lawsuits.
quote:authentically Louisiana
This law will undoubtedly lead to more litigation
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:29 am to LSUTANGERINE
And so, to get around this, you parody and satirize them
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:30 am to SuperSaint
quote:
This law will undoubtedly lead to more litigation
authentically Louisiana
Gotta stimulate the economy. Lawyers need a raise.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:59 am to LSUTANGERINE
Public information is still public…. Regardless of how or by whom it’s disseminated.. feeling they need special treatment is nothing new for public officials but without breaking existing laws.. this will only benefit lawyers and eventually will cost the taxpayers..
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:00 am to LSUTANGERINE
I'm ok with making doxxing a crime
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:01 am to jizzle6609
quote:
Wow, I thought he was motherless.

Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:13 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
sends written notice that it has to be removed
How long before a written notice is hand delivered by a swat team in the middle of the night?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:19 am to LSUTANGERINE
Bunch of fricking tyrant bitches. In addition to this, limits on public records law, limits on the ability of citizens to record the police in public.
I swear, a large swath of the United States population would be more comfortable in North Korea than the USA.
I swear, a large swath of the United States population would be more comfortable in North Korea than the USA.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:21 am to TROLA
quote:
Public information is still public…. Regardless of how or by whom it’s disseminated.. feeling they need special treatment is nothing new for public officials but without breaking existing laws.. this will only benefit lawyers and eventually will cost the taxpayers..
Agreed. Part of the tradeoff for being elected is that all of your information is supposed to be public. Your street address is needed for pay stubs, insurance, etc. and thus is publicly available information. It's not much different from the old days where someone's address was listed between their name and phone number in the phone book.
Some companies allowed you to opt-out your address, for others it was a paid service, but the default in the US was usually that it was present.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:25 am to ImJustaBoy
quote:
Does Jeff think he’s more powerful than the 1st amendment?
Yes
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:40 am to jizzle6609
Her address is already well known. It is a very successful brothel.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:44 am to LSUTANGERINE
Does this not apply for citizens who haven't been elected to something?
One law for thee, another for me.
One law for thee, another for me.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:45 am to LSUTANGERINE
Does that mean that if a politician gets arrested for something like a DUI/Disorderly Conduct, they can sue to not have their name released?
Popular
Back to top


25










