Started By
Message
locked post

Kelly was 9-3 in Openers at Notre Dame

Posted on 8/13/25 at 5:59 pm
Posted by Safety Blitz
The Backfield
Member since May 2022
3260 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 5:59 pm
Including wins against Florida St, Michigan and Texas. Losses to UGA, Texas and South Florida.

I think the trend here starts to turn.
Posted by Lacreus
30A
Member since Aug 2025
680 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

I think the trend here starts to turn.


I’ll believe it when I see it
Posted by Beessnax
Member since Nov 2015
10673 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 6:31 pm to
Someone is going to have to help me understand what the big deal is with having to win the season opener. It's just another game and at the end of the season it will go in the same W or L column as all of the others. So what if we win the opener but lose the next 5, or lose the opener and win the next 5? Which is more favorable?

If the latter is ideal why do we care about losing the first one?
This post was edited on 8/13/25 at 6:32 pm
Posted by iamandykeim
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2015
3515 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 6:34 pm to
great so we’re due for 9 straight season opening wins
Posted by SulphursFinest
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2015
11164 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 6:36 pm to
It’s actually crazy that you don’t see how big it is to start the season 1-0
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
16519 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 6:36 pm to
It’s more so the fact that it’s a non conference game. The SEC is tough enough that you know you are usually going to take a couple of conference games. 10-2 vs 9-3 is the difference between making the playoff or not.
Posted by RichJ
The Land of the CoonAss
Member since Nov 2016
4922 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

Kelly was 9-3 in Openers at Notre Dame


Well, obviously he is due…
Posted by red sox fan 13
Valley Park
Member since Aug 2018
18160 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

Someone is going to have to help me understand what the big deal is with having to win the season opener. It's just another game and at the end of the season it will go in the same W or L column as all of the others. So what if we win the opener but lose the next 5, or lose the opener and win the next 5? Which is more favorable? If the latter is ideal why do we care about losing the first one?
This is Stockholm Syndrome in action, ladies and gentlemen.

How about NOT having a razor thin margin for error every season where you have to go 10-1 with an SEC schedule to have a chance? How about NOT getting humiliated on a national stage for the umpteenth time? How about actually starting a season with positive momentum instead of feeling like you’re playing from behind all year? When you continuously lose the first game every year, your season ends when you lose a 2nd SEC game. It’s hard as hell to go 7-1 or better in conference play so you’re kneecapping yourself every year with these season opener losses.
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
15469 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

I’ll believe it when I see it

quote:

by Lacreus


It’s funny when the “new” accounts expose themselves right off the bat.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
64215 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 6:58 pm to
Sounds like Kelly is just a 9-3 kind of guy, except last year when he went 8-4.
Posted by Lacreus
30A
Member since Aug 2025
680 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

It’s funny when the “new” accounts expose themselves right off the bat.


It’s funny when someone has a different opinion on here, the hive mind collective immediately attacks them.

I want Kelly to succeed as badly as everyone else on here does. But I’m not going to get my hopes up just to be completely devastated, especially after the last 3 openers. Having a pessimistic viewpoint about the season prevents me from getting upset. You don’t have to think like this, but that’s how I do.
Posted by Bayoubengal205
Member since Nov 2016
1179 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 7:05 pm to
Benefits of winning the opener:
W on the schedule.
Players strengthen their confidence in their coaches and everything they have instilled in the off season.
Players strengthen their confidence in each other.
Much easier for a team to “gel” over a win than a loss. (A loss does offer opportunity for gelling but it takes more initiative than after a win)
Positive momentum moving forward into the season.
And in this particular case, giving Clemson a big ole L in their own house.

All the work the players and coaches put into their craft in the offseason feels “worth it” when a team wins the opener. It’s like steroids to ALL the intangible things a team requires to be great.
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
7918 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

I’ll believe it when I see it


I am optimistic to a point...I really think we could win this game...

BUT

I agree, I'll believe it when I see it too.
Posted by 33inNC
Charlotte, NC
Member since Mar 2011
6144 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 7:22 pm to
This guy gets it. It's about having your team ready to start the season and not having to regroup after a loss in a winnable game.

Won't matter as much with the CFP, but people remember your nationally televised loss if all things are equal.
Posted by scorb
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
1891 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 7:30 pm to
Someone has win this game. Clemson hasn't exactly lit the world on fire in their opening games the last few years.

2024 - L vs UGA 34-3
2023 - L vs Duke 28-7
2022 - W vs GA Tech 41-10
2021 - L vs UGA 10-3
Posted by Macavity92
Member since Dec 2004
6220 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 8:44 pm to
Purdue W
USF L
Navy W
Temple W
Rice W
Texas W
Texas L
Temple W
Mich W
Louisville W
Duke W
FSU W
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
41790 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

It’s actually crazy that you don’t see how big it is to start the season 1-0



It's always been better to lose early than late. But losing a season opener is never ideal.
Posted by da prophet
hammond, la
Member since Sep 2013
2911 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

Including wins against Florida St, Michigan and Texas. Losses to UGA, Texas and South Florida.

I think the trend here starts to turn.

It has nothing to do with BK's trends as a coach before the transfer portal changes. BK is leaning heavily on portal players from year to year at LSU, like most teams are. New portals players need time to get comfortable with their new team/scheme. This problem didn't exist when BK was at Notre Dame. One way to minimize this problem is don't schedule a top ten team in their home stadium for the first game.
Posted by da prophet
hammond, la
Member since Sep 2013
2911 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 10:03 pm to
How about NOT having a razor thin margin for error every season where you have to go 10-1 with an SEC schedule to have a chance? How about NOT getting humiliated on a national stage for the umpteenth time? How about actually starting a season with positive momentum instead of feeling like you’re playing from behind all year? When you continuously lose the first game every year, your season ends when you lose a 2nd SEC game. It’s hard as hell to go 7-1 or better in conference play so you’re kneecapping yourself every year with these season opener losses.

Very well said, but many on this board live in fantasy land.
Posted by TXTiger81
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2021
1285 posts
Posted on 8/14/25 at 4:55 am to
Not this year buddy. He will be 0-4 in openers at LSU on 8/31/25
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram