- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DOJ employee upset she was fired over her obstruction of justice......
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:41 am
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:41 am
NY Post
Probabty a good fire if she things OWNING the app does not make her culpable,
There will be some loon on the left that compares this to noing where a DUI checkpoint or speed trap is. If you are one of those loons please do not comment and go to sleep.
quote:
A Department of Justice staffer claims she was abruptly fired after it emerged that her husband was the brains behind a controversial anti-ICE app that warns users when the feds are closing in.
Carolyn Feinstein, who worked as a DOJ forensic accountant in Austin, Texas, alleges she was terminated last Friday as “retribution” for her spouse’s radical alert system, in which she has minority shares.
quote:
“ICEBlock is an app that illegal aliens use to evade capture while endangering the lives of ICE officers,” the spokesperson said, adding that the department “will not tolerate threats against law enforcement or law enforcement officers.”
Probabty a good fire if she things OWNING the app does not make her culpable,
There will be some loon on the left that compares this to noing where a DUI checkpoint or speed trap is. If you are one of those loons please do not comment and go to sleep.
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 9:43 am
19
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:45 am to Cell of Awareness
The app is free speech deal with it.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:45 am to Cell of Awareness
What part of her being fired is she confused about?
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:47 am to Cell of Awareness
She can be confused.
That's fine.
Her arse is still fired, though.
That's fine.
Her arse is still fired, though.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:48 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
You do something in your spare time to intentionally undermine your employer and see how long you keep your job once they find out about it.
She's not going to jail for it. Her free speech isn't being violated. Now if she was posting privileged info on that app that she was able to get via her DOJ employment, then she should face charges.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:49 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
They didn't get arrested....
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:49 am to Cell of Awareness
Congrats to this dipshit, who found out there are actually ways to get fired as a federal government employee contrary to popular belief.
It may be HARD to get fired as one, but there is always a way.
It may be HARD to get fired as one, but there is always a way.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:49 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
Joking or Ruhtard? Not sure which
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:51 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
True it is free speech but free speech sometimes has unintended consequences
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:52 am to ForeverEllisHugh
As a famous judge once said, you can't yell "Fire" in a crowded theater. So, there are limits on speech. And all speech ain't free as anyone who has been sued for slander et al will tell you.
If it could be successfully argued that this app put lives in danger? abetted a felony? HMMM
If it could be successfully argued that this app put lives in danger? abetted a felony? HMMM
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 9:53 am
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:53 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
Her free speech has not been compromised. All that has happened is that she has now learned that there can be consequences for your actions.
She will learn to deal with it, or not.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:53 am to Schmelly
quote:
Joking or Ruhtard? Not sure which
I am sure which one.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:53 am to Cell of Awareness
quote:
in which she has minority shares.
Well that's a pretty good reason to fire someone. It's not just something that her husband did, she is part owner. So she is profiting from an app that subverts the US Justice system.
I bet she had no objections to accepting her salary from such a corrupt government though
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:54 am to Cell of Awareness
quote:
Carolyn Feinstein, who worked as a DOJ forensic accountant in Austin, Texas, alleges she was terminated last Friday as “retribution” for her spouse’s radical alert system, in which she has minority shares.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:55 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
app is free speech deal with it.
Is it though? There are limits to speech. Even in the USA. If the app uses privileged info or sets agents up to be ambushed…
We don’t know enough yet to say it is protected speech.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:55 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
A device to stalk or track is not free speech. Particularly when that information is being provided to hinder an active investigation.
And it is possibly a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(c),
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 9:57 am
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:56 am to Keith13
quote:The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed
True it is free speech but free speech sometimes has unintended consequences
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:58 am to Cell of Awareness
quote:
There will be some loon on the left that compares this to noing where a DUI checkpoint or speed trap is. If you are one of those loons please do not comment and go to sleep.
I don't like the hypocrisy being pointed out and certainly don't want to discuss how this attacks the 1st Amendment, so I'm trying to remove the ability to discuss either summarily
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:00 am to tilthatday
quote:
If it could be successfully argued that this app put lives in danger? abetted a felony? HMMM
Those are theoretical arguments, but bad ones.
If successful they would basically create a permanent loophole in the 1A that government could exploit in perpetuity, by labeling any speech as "putting lives in danger" or "abetting" some felony
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:01 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
The app is free speech deal with it.
How is obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting, or whatever other criminal act you want to call it free speech?
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 10:01 am
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News