- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Orleans Parish DAs office creates fake trials to let Defendants skate from charges
Posted on 7/8/25 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 7/8/25 at 7:33 pm
This way Jason Williams can't be accused of dismissing cases if the DA goes to trial with no evidence or real intent of even trying a convict someone. If you want to know why families are moving out of Orleans Parish in droves it is shite like this that caused them to leave.
These two Wallace and Conrad are charged with illegal
possession of a stolen gun while in possession of drugs. Wallace is a 4 time felon with convictions for distribution of cocaine, possession of cocaine, extortion, domestic abuse, etc.
These two Wallace and Conrad are charged with illegal
possession of a stolen gun while in possession of drugs. Wallace is a 4 time felon with convictions for distribution of cocaine, possession of cocaine, extortion, domestic abuse, etc.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 7/8/25 at 10:54 pm
17
Posted on 7/8/25 at 7:47 pm to MrLSU
Nothing shady would surprise me from Soros DA Williams, but:
quote:
Your Honor had recently found that there was no probable cause and suppressed all the evidence in this matter.
Posted on 7/8/25 at 7:48 pm to MrLSU
Holy moly... is that REAL?!?
How awful. It's a joke to them.
How awful. It's a joke to them.
Posted on 7/8/25 at 7:51 pm to MrLSU
We need legislation to delegate the prosecution of all felonies in Orleans to the state AG.
Posted on 7/8/25 at 7:54 pm to MrLSU
Voters get the governance they deserve.
Posted on 7/8/25 at 8:00 pm to MrLSU
Sounds like NOPD just needs to shoot all criminals and cover it up.
Posted on 7/8/25 at 8:02 pm to MrLSU
There was no evidence for trial.
You forgot to highlight this part:
You would have bitched if the DA dismissed the case. He went to trial with zero evidence instead.
I think your anger may be misdirected in this case at least
You forgot to highlight this part:
quote:
12 Your Honor had recently found that
13 there was no probable cause and
14 suppressed all the evidence in this
15 matter.
You would have bitched if the DA dismissed the case. He went to trial with zero evidence instead.
I think your anger may be misdirected in this case at least
Posted on 7/8/25 at 8:03 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
From 2021 to 2023, 123 bench trials were held in the court. Campbell and Roche handled more than half, 51% of them. Campbell acquitted defendants in 79% of her judge trials. In violent felony cases, that number climbed to 91%. That’s 21 acquittals out of 23 trials. Roche, in his first full year on the bench, acquitted defendants in 88% of his judge trials. Roche, who began serving a full term in 2023, acquitted defendants in 88% of his judge trials in his first full year on the bench. “These cases indicate that there is a strategic advantage for defendants to waive a jury before these two judges,” said Rafael Goyeneche, president of the Metropolitan Crime Commission. “And these two judges should not be outliers to this extent.”
Posted on 7/8/25 at 8:03 pm to MrLSU
I know Ed. Take the win, buddy! This post was edited on 7/8/25 at 8:04 pm
Posted on 7/8/25 at 8:06 pm to soccerfüt
If there was no probable cause, it was a joke from the start…
The real frustration is all three pieces- NOPD, DA and the judges have been a disaster… and it’s real hard to effect change without strides in all 3… or I guess coming in with state police for state charges and state trials to side step everything local
The real frustration is all three pieces- NOPD, DA and the judges have been a disaster… and it’s real hard to effect change without strides in all 3… or I guess coming in with state police for state charges and state trials to side step everything local
Posted on 7/8/25 at 8:14 pm to Saskwatch
quote:
Can wytes sell crack, tote a Glock wit da switch, and skate free in da 504?
I’m not sure whether you will be mad or happy but… yea, they probably can more often than most places
Posted on 7/8/25 at 8:14 pm to MrLSU
Okay, let the record reflect the
deputy called the officer's name
three times in the hallway. There
Was no answer or response. ….
you got any
other witnesses, State?
The State rests.
This is mildly important. They would have tried it with the officer’s testimony but he didn’t show for whatever reason (fired, quit, ignored it, was on shift elsewhere) . So they had no evidence due to the suppression and their sole witness didn’t show. This judge likely would have denied a continuance, but they could have asked on the record -maybe they did in pre-trial. Sounds like they planned to go forward with one witness and failed. Probably weren’t getting a conviction with this judge anyway.
deputy called the officer's name
three times in the hallway. There
Was no answer or response. ….
you got any
other witnesses, State?
The State rests.
This is mildly important. They would have tried it with the officer’s testimony but he didn’t show for whatever reason (fired, quit, ignored it, was on shift elsewhere) . So they had no evidence due to the suppression and their sole witness didn’t show. This judge likely would have denied a continuance, but they could have asked on the record -maybe they did in pre-trial. Sounds like they planned to go forward with one witness and failed. Probably weren’t getting a conviction with this judge anyway.
Posted on 7/8/25 at 8:29 pm to Big Jim Slade
This is bullshite. First off, they didn't even ask for a continuance. Roche is the nicest guy ever. He isn't jamming anyone. You have the transcript, no continuance, no objection to denial. Second, they could have taken a writ or to buy time. Third, there's an NOPD Sgt assigned to get cops to court. If they call him, he will show up at their homes and drag him to court.
This was planned.
This was planned.
This post was edited on 7/8/25 at 8:33 pm
Posted on 7/8/25 at 9:29 pm to Havoc
quote:
Your Honor had recently found that there was no probable cause and suppressed all the evidence in this matter.
I've seen this too many times in Orleans court, even if you have it air tight, they will find no probable cause.
Ex. Stolen car, 4 stolen guns in the car, 5 suspects in the car. Pursuit ends in a crash all 5 run and all 5 are caught. Driver has keys to the car.
Judge finds no probable cause for the stolen car charge and stolen gun/felon in possession charges. Only find probable cause for the agg flight charge on the driver.
Was told the police couldn't prove the driver knew the car was stolen, passengers couldn't have known it was a stolen car or that anyone knew the guns were in the car because driver had the keys.
Posted on 7/8/25 at 10:32 pm to MrLSU
Well all evidence was suppressed, so...
Posted on 7/8/25 at 10:51 pm to MrLSU
I’m no lawyer and I don’t even fully understand what all they did but my question is this: how are the people involved with all of that fraud not arrested and put under the jail?
Posted on 7/8/25 at 11:27 pm to arseinclarse
quote:that is insane
Campbell acquitted defendants in 79% of her judge trials. In violent felony cases, that number climbed to 91%. That’s 21 acquittals out of 23 trials. Roche, in his first full year on the bench, acquitted defendants in 88% of his judge trials. Roche, who began serving a full term in 2023, acquitted defendants in 88% of his judge trials in his first full year on the bench.
How is judges like this not tarred and feathered?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 3:30 am to arseinclarse
Are these judges on the take?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 5:37 am to MrLSU
At one of his first interviews after getting elected, and somehow being found not guilty after a grand jury found enough evidence to indict him on federal tax charges, he outlined a list of charges he planned on decriminalizing such as crimes of poverty. Basically giving people the right to steal from you or businesses if they were impoverished.
When you elect an activist, this is what you get.
When you elect an activist, this is what you get.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 5:38 am to MrLSU
The judge suppressed all of the evidence. What did you want the DA to do?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News