- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
U.S. Federal District Judge: Bans ICE from arresting illegals.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:22 am
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:22 am
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:23 am to BCreed1
When they have warning, a fricking judge smuggles them out of the courtroom.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:23 am to BCreed1
Good luck. Looks like another judge needs to be perp walked.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:23 am to BCreed1
Isn't being here illegally all the warrant needed?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:24 am to BCreed1
They're just building case for impeaching Trump if they take back congress next year. No other explanation
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:25 am to BCreed1
And this is the one where Trump needs to tell all these judges to frick right off and start defunding their offices…
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:25 am to SallysHuman
What happens if you get caught in a store shop lifting?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:26 am to BCreed1
i hope trumps' team is compiling a list of all these anti-american judges and that congress will grow some balls and start removing these acitvists installed by the biden cartel.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:27 am to BCreed1
What an ignorant judge. If this stood, it would mean that no LEO could arrest anyone in the act of committing a crime without a warrant. How asinine.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:27 am to BCreed1

quote:another reason Duke U needs to be expelled from the South -
California State University, Bakersfield (BS)
California Pacific University (JD)
Duke University (LLM)
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 11:30 am
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:29 am to BCreed1
that should be enough for the SCOTUS to act. Democrats always overreach
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:29 am to 1801
quote:
Bakersfield trash appointed by FJB
That dumb bitch doesn't even know who Dwight Yoakem (sp) is.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:31 am to FriedEggBowL
Where have you been? That’s the 100th thing the Supreme Court should’ve stepped in on and the most they’ve done is issue vague rulings. They’re part of the problem if you didn’t realize it in 2020 with the no standing bullshite against the states lawsuits. Whose ONLY relief is to take it to the Supreme Court. Lucky it didn’t start a war
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:33 am to MikeBRLA
quote:
What an ignorant judge. If this stood, it would mean that no LEO could arrest anyone in the act of committing a crime without a warrant. How asinine.
exactly. Like I said. Shoplifting. You can be arrested for shoplifting without a warrant.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:33 am to SallysHuman
all she is asking for is 24 million warrants spread out over 16 years written by 200 thousand lawyers for 1.5 trillion dollars. She got no demonstrated comprehension of the problem an d should be removed
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:36 am to BCreed1
Kids these days be all like “ I want to be a district court judge when I grow up so I can be the person who tells the president what he can or cannot do.”
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:37 am to TechBullDawg
quote:
They're just building case for impeaching Trump if they take back congress next year.
We have been appreciative and supportive of much of this President's agenda, but the overstepping of constitutional powers cannot be ignored, therefore it saddens us to have no other choice but to vote to remove him from office.
- Republican Senators
Don’t think there aren’t quite a few whose toes he’s stepping on.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:37 am to BCreed1
Republicans in congress need to stop this
Posted on 4/30/25 at 11:39 am to Trevaylin
quote:
all she is asking for is 24 million warrants spread out over 16 years written by 200 thousand lawyers for 1.5 trillion dollars. She got no demonstrated comprehension of the problem an d should be removed
No. This is only for the Eastern District of California. Anyway here's the local ABC article:
quote:
FRESNO, Calif. (KFSN) -- A federal judge in Fresno has barred Border Patrol agents from arresting someone suspected of living in the U.S. illegally unless they have a warrant or a reason to believe the person might flee before a warrant can be obtained following a local raid in January.
Tuesday's ruling from U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston also says Border Patrol agents can't stop people without having reasonable suspicion or return them to their countries of origin via "voluntary departure" unless that person is informed of their rights and agrees to leave.
The ruling only applies to people within the court's Eastern District of California, which includes Fresno, Bakersfield, Sacramento, and extends to the Oregon border.
quote:
Seventy-eight people were swept up in January after the Border Patrol launched an immigration enforcement action dubbed "Operation Return to Sender" in the Bakersfield area.
As an aside "Operation Return to Sender" is

quote:
The American Civil Liberties Union sued Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and U.S. Border Patrol officials on behalf of the labor union United Farm Workers and people who were targeted during the Border Patrol raids.
The ACLU said border patrol agents spent nearly a week unconstitutionally detaining people who "appeared to be farmworkers or day laborers, regardless of their actual immigration status or individual circumstances." The detainees were bussed to the border, held without any way to contact family or attorneys, and coerced into signing papers that said they had waived their right to see an immigration judge and voluntarily agreed to leave the country, the ACLU said.
"The evidence before the Court is that Border Patrol agents under DHS authority engaged in conduct that violated well-established constitutional rights," Thurston wrote. She said the Border Patrol would have to provide a report showing exactly who is detained or arrested without warrants, and why, every 60 days until the lawsuit is concluded.
Attorneys for the Border Patrol had argued the judge lacked jurisdiction to consider the case because federal law says that immigration matters can generally only be appealed once an immigration judge has issued a final order.
Attorneys from the Justice Department told the judge in Fresno on Monday that the case should be "moot" and said placing conditions on immigration enforcement would "burden the government."
Popular
Back to top
