- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
U.S. c02 emissions have fallen to below WW1 levels
Posted on 4/2/25 at 11:49 am
Posted on 4/2/25 at 11:49 am
9
Posted on 4/2/25 at 11:50 am to RaoulDuke504
This was during the Industrial Revolution and had a population of 76 million compared to 350 million today
Posted on 4/2/25 at 11:54 am to RaoulDuke504
quote:
This was during the Industrial Revolution and had a population of 76 million compared to 350 million today
That’s why it’s a per capita graph and not a total emissions graph.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:05 pm to RaoulDuke504
We should probably thank China for that.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:10 pm to RaoulDuke504
Maybe Trump is destroying our economy because he wants the earth to heal
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:11 pm to ibldprplgld
so bringing in 20 million illegals is a good thing that lowers co2/pax
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:18 pm to RaoulDuke504
We’re literally starving the trees and patting ourselves on the back.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:25 pm to ibldprplgld
quote:
That’s why it’s a per capita graph and not a total emissions graph.
Why are we using a per capita graph though?
If the argument is a certain volume of CO2 emission will mess up the planet, then a per capita counter argument doesn't seem to make sense at all.
It shows directional "positive" (depending on your line of thinking) movement regarding efficiency, but not overall results.
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:30 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
Why are we using a per capita graph though?
So idiots like the OP can misinterpret the data and make posts with misleading titles.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:32 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
Hey, no one ask for your reasonable logic. We found data that supports our stance; therefore, you are fake science.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:34 pm to FutureMikeVIII
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:39 pm to Trevaylin
quote:just like libs turning on electric vehicles lately, they’ll now be cool with CO2 emissions if it means more illegals can come in to get these graphs back to normal.
so bringing in 20 million illegals is a good thing that lowers co2/pax
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:39 pm to RaoulDuke504
Wonder what the charts for China and India look like?
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:44 pm to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
So idiots like the OP can misinterpret the data and make posts with misleading titles.
not saying this is any better, but….we have an entire industry for this in the United States. Along with “scientists” who use manipulated data to produce these reports/studies misleading articles.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:46 pm to RaoulDuke504
Make Co2 Great Again
Posted on 4/2/25 at 12:59 pm to notiger1997
quote:
Wonder what the charts for China and India look like?
Posted on 4/2/25 at 1:16 pm to TT9
"Climate change" is a hoax.
It's also an oxymoron.
It's also an oxymoron.
Posted on 4/2/25 at 1:53 pm to Weekend Warrior79
For funsies...
This graph below and the fact that China gets a complete pass from the media, politicians, and "climate activists" should tell you everything you need to know about the ultimate goal of their movement...
This graph below and the fact that China gets a complete pass from the media, politicians, and "climate activists" should tell you everything you need to know about the ultimate goal of their movement...
Posted on 4/2/25 at 1:54 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:according to right wing talking heads. 97% of the worlds scientists believe it exists. i'll listen to them over some retarded right wingers like dead Limbaugh and Faux news.
"Climate change" is a hoax
Posted on 4/2/25 at 1:57 pm to TT9
quote:
97% of the worlds scientists believe it exists.
I can't tell if you're using that stat ironically or because you truly believe it.
Add on to my previous post...it's almost entertaining to watch the UK screw over their citizens to attempt to reduce their CO2 emissions. The UK contributes 0.88% of the global emissions.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News