- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Russia says any peacekeeping troops must be from Non NATO Countries
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:24 pm
This seems reasonable. I don't believe China has provided Russia with any Weapons or Weapon Systems like Europe/NATO has provided to Ukraine. Maybe a combination of Australian and Chinese Troops would be a fair compromise for Peacekeeping Troops in Ukraine
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
29
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:29 pm to John Barron
So who?
Japan?
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:29 pm to John Barron
It would most likely have to be China. I don’t like China, but they would be more trustworthy than any NATO force. Which is sad.
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:29 pm to John Barron
Good
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:32 pm to John Barron
maybe some peacekeepers from Greenland...
oh wait everybody in Greenland will soon be millionaires
oh wait everybody in Greenland will soon be millionaires
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:33 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
NATO will assist Ukraine in creating incidents to cause problems and start another war.
No thank you.
No thank you.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:35 pm to Lord of the Hogs
quote:
It would most likely have to be China. I don’t like China, but they would be more trustworthy than any NATO force. Who is sad.
China? Yeah, right. I'm sure Ukrainians would trust Chinese troops protecting them from Russia. It's more likely they would turn around and join the Russian troops against Ukraine.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:36 pm to John Barron
Thailand
India
Kenya
India
Kenya
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:36 pm to John Barron
Should use Saudis
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:38 pm to John Barron
No way it's China - they are an aligned power that is providing weapons and support to Russia. Let South America, Africa, Indonesia and India send troops. It's their world too. Do your part.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:40 pm to John Barron
Japan, Australia, Argentina, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:40 pm to OBReb6
quote:
Should use Saudis
Why would Saudi agree to that? What’s in it for them to put their men in harms way?
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:40 pm to Lord of the Hogs
quote:
It would most likely have to be China. I don’t like China, but they would be more trustworthy than any NATO force. Which is sad.
Soo
China would absolutely use their "peacekeepers" to overthrow the Ukrainian government.
The fact that you and Barron like that idea means that it's a terrible idea.
India would be a much better option.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:42 pm to Marquesa
quote:
that is providing weapons
Incorrect. You must be thinking of North Korea. China has not provided weapons or weapon systems to Russia. I am thinking a mixture of Saudi,Vietnamese,South Korea might do it.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:44 pm to John Barron
Honestly, I think this is fair especially if you look at their perspective.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:44 pm to John Barron
quote:
Chinese Troops
quote:
John Barron
Big surprise
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:45 pm to John Barron
quote:stop "thinking" for all our sake
I am thinking a mixture of Saudi,Vietnamese,South Korea might do it.
jesus,, Every time I think you could not be more dumb you actually mistakenly give your own opinion and prove me wrong
but please tell us how you came up with this combination ?
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 2:47 pm
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:46 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
So who? Japan?
The U.N. Make every UN nation send 50 troops with their best artillery. Exclude this requirement for UN nations that are in NATO. There will be language problems but it's gonna make for some really funny videos.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:47 pm to Narax
Honestly, I’m for no peacekeeping troops at all, from any nation. I’m for a long lasting peace.
However, no matter where it’s at or who it is, the globalists will find a way to start conflict.
However, no matter where it’s at or who it is, the globalists will find a way to start conflict.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:48 pm to Narax
quote:
India would be a much better option
India is fair. I only mentioned China in regards to trusting them more than Europe. Europe has been sending Weapons,Weapon Systems, Tanks, Artillery, Aircraft and money. China has not done any of those things and has not been encouraging the War to continue
Page 1 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News