re: Russia says any peacekeeping troops must be from Non NATO Countries

Its amazing that people here actually see the British and the French as the "goodies" while the rest of the world knows their evils. Anyone that studies history knows their evils. Neither can ever get a on high horse over anyone else.

I will admit that he has changed his suggestions for the troops many times so if I've failed to keep track of it

OK I admit I failed the keep track of all the changes to his opinion in this thread ,,, I acknowledge my mistake

in this conversation

which he started

And said China in the very first post


But now he's taking China off his list


In this thread in about ten minutes or less



But I will say even though I've not said it previously I kind of reject Russia dictating who the peacekeeping troops are going to be

And if some countries that are a part of NATO want to risk manpower and make the investment it's not Russia's place to dismiss it as a demand . Nor should American troops be put in harm's way although I understand the nato agreement obligates us but separate treaties can be made for separate situations

Again my primary concern after not risking American personnel is getting American taxpayer dollars in return
FOR THE INVESTMENT MADE


With so many precious metals so critical to new technology And the economic impact that can make
and we've already given a great deal of the supply that is in Africa to the Chinese I am not comfortable with giving them more of the supply and I understand supply has been found in America but we're not getting it out of the ground yet

quote:

---

Its amazing that people here actually see the British and the French as the "goodies"

---

Yeah, we're talking about Russia and China, sport.

quote:

---

This seems reasonable. I don't believe China has provided Russia with any Weapons or Weapon Systems like Europe/NATO has provided to Ukraine. Maybe a combination of Australian and Chinese Troops would be a fair compromise for Peacekeeping Troops in Ukraine

---

Yeah, but the main reason Russia survived this conflict after the rough start was realigning their economy towards China. Also, China is giving them other things that ostensibly are not warfighting related but made this war not tear apart their society.

China wanted Russia to survive this so the US can’t fully pivot towards only focusing on China.

Yea kiddo.

I thought you had to change bedpans on the weekends.

It’s looking like you don’t leave the basement.

quote:

---

You say so much shite you can't keep track of it
and now you're expecting me to

---

You are once again embarrassing yourself Owl. I will post Your Own Quote again from Page 1....

quote:

---

JB= "I am thinking a mixture of Saudi,Vietnamese,South Korea might do it."



Owl=stop "thinking" for all our sake


jesus,, Every time I think you could not be more dumb you actually mistakenly give your own opinion and prove me wrong

but please tell us how you came up with this combination ?

---

Your own words asked me to explain how I came up with the combination of South Korea, Vietnam, Saudi Arabia but now you are trying to act like you are confused. If you can't remember what you said 5 minutes ago maybe it's time to stop posting. Drawing Pictures and eating Pudding might be more your pace

quote:

---

So who?

Japan?

---

North Korea.

And his post that mentions Vietnam or whatever the whatever his second or third opinion was was cut and pasted
because that is nowhere near the style that he uses

and his scoring system and the breaks
...
was obviously taken and cut,pasted from an article /newsletter

So again, as everything is with him, it's not really his opinion it's just something he thinks sounds smart
Which is easily smarter than anything he would come up with on his own