Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Louisiana early voting constitutional amendments opens today

Posted on 11/22/24 at 1:56 pm
Posted by LoneStar23
USA
Member since Aug 2019
5781 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 1:56 pm
Election for 12/7 go out and vote- 4 amendments
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35666 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:02 pm to
The legislature, or SOS, or whoever makes the decision to hide these things on random election dates is pure scum.
Posted by Macfly
BR & DS
Member since Jan 2016
9956 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:03 pm to
Voted and nobody but me and tumbleweeds in there this morning.
Posted by Classy Doge
Member since Nov 2021
4518 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Voted and nobody but me and tumbleweeds in there this morning.
Exactly what the political machine wanted by scheduling this vote. A ridiculous waste of state resources to help ensure the outcome with an absurdly low turnout
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
34071 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

The legislature, or SOS, or whoever makes the decision to hide these things on random election dates is pure scum.



and they will continue to add it to every ballot until it passes. Im not going to read the amendments, but am going to vote NO on everyone.
Posted by Dustydubs
Member since Mar 2020
490 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:11 pm to
What’s the plan straight no all the way down?
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20623 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

The legislature, or SOS, or whoever makes the decision to hide these things on random election dates is pure scum.

Also the terrible wording of these things makes you question WTF is going on. Won't be able to early vote, so have not really looked into these, but this is what you see:
quote:

CA No. 1 (ACT No. 405, 2024 - SB 177) - Provides relative to the investigative authority and membership of the judiciary commission

CA No. 2 (ACT No. 406, 2024 - HB 48) - Provides relative to the timing of consideration and required information of appropriations bills

CA No. 3 (ACT No. 407, 2024 - HB 49) - Allows the legislature to extend a regular session for a limited time period for a specific purpose

CA No. 4 (ACT No. 409, 2024 - SB 119) - Provides relative to the administration of tax sales of immovable property

Then you get to look further into it to decide what the hell is going on:
quote:

CA1: Do you support an amendment to allow the supreme court to sanction a judge upon an investigation by the judiciary commission, and provide that the recommended sanction shall be instituted by the judiciary commission or by a majority of the supreme court, and to provide for the appointment of five members of the judiciary commission? (Amends Article V, Section 25(C); adds Article V, Section 25(A)(4))

CA2: Do you support an amendment to require that the legislature wait for at least forty-eight hours prior to concurring in a conference committee report or amendments to a bill appropriating money? (Adds Article III, Section 16(F))

CA3: Do you support an amendment to allow the legislature to extend a regular session in increments of two days up to a maximum of six days if necessary to pass a bill appropriating money? (Amends Article III, Sections 2(A)(3)(a) and (4)(a); Adds Article III, Section 2(A)(5))

CA4: Do you support an amendment to eliminate mandatory tax sales for nonpayment of property taxes and require the legislature to provide for such procedures by law; to limit the amount of penalty and interest on delinquent property taxes; and to provide for the postponement of property tax payments under certain circumstances? (Amends Article VII, Section 25)

Now, we need to look into each of these articles to determine what the current rules/laws are and how these amendments will actually change the current rules.
Posted by LSUJML
Central
Member since May 2008
51895 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Im not going to read the amendments, but am going to vote NO on everyone.


# 1 needs a yes vote
Gives SC authority to start investigations into shitty judges instead of waiting on commission recommendation
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
22961 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

What’s the plan straight no all the way down?


No is my default vote on LA Constitutional Amendments. However, after reading these amendments, I think I will be voting yes on all of them unless I can be educated about why I am wrong
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14959 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

LINK


Normal "go-to" source for unbiased review of amendments. They don't take positions.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
8251 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:55 pm to
OP should post the PAR analysis of the amendments. These are all over my head.

Edit:

PAR Link

My vote now after reading:

Amend 1: YES
Amend 2: YES
Amend 3: YES
Amend 4: YES

I went back and forth on 1, but I do think this judiciary commission reform may help with dealing with some of the bad judges in the state.

This post was edited on 11/22/24 at 3:04 pm
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
26305 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:58 pm to
Im thinking

#1 Yes
#2 No
#3 No
#4 No
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
8251 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:05 pm to
Everyone should be yes on 4. Our current tax sale procedure is unconstitutional.
Posted by Red Stick Rambler
https://i.imgur.com/2j5cbGm.jpg
Member since Jun 2011
2253 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:05 pm to
(no message)
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17346 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

The legislature, or SOS, or whoever makes the decision to hide these things on random election dates is pure scum.


I firmly believe when it comes to electing representatives, senators, vice-president, and President, that election must be held on its own, without any amendment, tax, or other regulatory issue seen on that ballot.

Likewise, for all other scenarios, there should be only 1 day per year for such election pertaining to those scenarios to take place.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35666 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

I firmly believe when it comes to electing representatives, senators, vice-president, and President, that election must be held on its own, without any amendment, tax, or other regulatory issue seen on that ballot.

Why?
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
71329 posts
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

What’s the plan straight no all the way down?

To read them, figure out what they mean and any potential ramifications or unintended consequences, make an informed decision, and vote according to that decision.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but that's how a respectable person should approach such matters.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram