Started By
Message

Trump fans, help me out: “Immunity from prosecution for police”

Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:20 pm
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
20023 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:20 pm
What is the full message here? Surely this is out of context.

Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
10493 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:21 pm to
It means when your boyfriend George Floyd kills himself via a massive overdose, the police wont get charged for it.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 8:22 pm
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30259 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:24 pm to
I feel comfortable assuming that he meant qualified immunity from being personally sued, which has been stricken from the law in some significant places.
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
9042 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:36 pm to
I have an idea what he meant to say but, he fudged it up. However, we all know his thoughts about his RED FLAG law.

Either we are Americans under the same rule of law, LEO or private or, we are not.

Fair and impartial trial of our peers.

As in all situations, even good folks take advantage of "change".
Posted by shoelessjoe
Member since Jul 2006
9924 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:37 pm to
The full message is that the liberal scum are about to realize that we are taking our country back. ANTIFA, BLM, Proud Boys and other made up shithead groups will recieve cracked skulls if the continue to FAFO!!
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30259 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:48 pm to
Red Flag laws are almost exclusively implemented by states under state law. Take Florida for example. One of the toughest Red Flag laws in the country. Has Desanis used consolidated power (Governor + a near rubber stamp legislature for him) to recall that state’s law in that regard? No. He has very intentionally chosen not to. Because he’s thought the whole thing through (many, many factors and considerations) and has left it alone because he’s had the good sense not to. No Republican Governors have recalled their state’s entire Red Flag law. Because again they’ve had the good sense not to.
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
9042 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:51 pm to
They're still his thoughts.
Posted by Miketheseventh
Member since Dec 2017
5810 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:54 pm to
It means give them back their qualified immunity back. This administration has been weakening the immunity that police were given. Just another example of Pedo Joe administration giving criminals the upper hand
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10454 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:55 pm to
Huge Trump fan but I disagree with him on this and the Vaccine
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
25146 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:56 pm to
frick the police. Trump is a pandering dumbass at times and this is just another example
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10454 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:57 pm to
They need less immunity not more
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47661 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

he meant qualified immunity from being personally sued, which has been stricken from the law in some significant places


So abortion should be left to the states, but qualified immunity not so much?
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30259 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:52 pm to
Well yeah definitely his thoughts. They happen to be mine as well and Desantis’ too and any other sane and rational person. I’m willing to give that small concession if it may realistically contribute to avoiding my child or future grandchildren, or yours or anyone else’s from getting their head blown apart in a school shooting. Or my wife at the grocery or yours, etc etc. Those type things aren’t exactly an unlikely scenario this day in age.

ETA….And I know many people are of the belief that the Red Flag process is of an irreversible nature and has no due process or fail safe measures, to which I’d be happy to clarify for our own edification.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 9:55 pm
Posted by geauxturbo
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
4177 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 5:49 am to
OR, you could just enforce the laws that exist. Unaccountability for people who can take your freedom by force is not a good thing. Disagree with DJT on this one.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68891 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 6:12 am to
quote:

Take Florida for example



quote:

Washington DC — Today, GIFFORDS, the gun violence prevention organization founded by former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, announced new digital and print ads ahead of the Republican debate in Miami. The ad, published today in the Miami Herald, uses Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’s failing campaign to show that Republicans can no longer rely on appeasing the gun lobby in attempt to shore up conservative support. DeSantis’s poll numbers have done nothing but fall since he cozied up to NRA lobbyists and signed dangerous permitless carry legislation into law.

Chris Harris, GIFFORDS Vice President of Communications: “Governor DeSantis learned the hard way that supporting the gun lobby agenda no longer helps win over Republican primary voters. Polling shows that he saw absolutely no political benefit from jamming through the NRA’s top legislative priority. To the contrary, his polling has done nothing but fall since the day he signed his dangerous ‘Anyone with a Gun’ permitless carry bill into law.





quote:

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Today, Governor Ron DeSantis signed House Bill (HB) 543 which strengthens Floridians’ Second Amendment rights by allowing Floridians to carry concealed weapons without a government-issued permit.



This post was edited on 5/4/24 at 6:20 am
Posted by GruntbyAssociation
Member since Jul 2013
3800 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 6:25 am to
quote:

I feel comfortable assuming that he meant qualified immunity from being personally sued


This, just bringing back what was originally in place.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68157 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 6:32 am to
quote:

Fair and impartial trial of our peers.


Trump's trials prove that the system no longer delivers this in many parts of the country.
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
14280 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 6:36 am to
quote:

Trump is a pandering dumbass at times and this is just another example


He just says what he thinks his Facebook boomer followers want to hear.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 6:38 am to
Don once again spouting off on bullshite in an effort to throw some red meat to his base. shite like this is why people turn away from him.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
13510 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 7:03 am to
quote:

quote:
Trump is a pandering dumbass at times and this is just another example


He just says what he thinks his Facebook boomer followers want to hear.


Pretty ignorant posts, Trump has been clear and concise on his stand regarding this for years.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram