- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

What is a worse situation to be in? Animal Attack
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:02 am
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:02 am
Stuck in waters with sharks or stuck in an open field with Lions?
No escape. Nothing to help you.
No escape. Nothing to help you.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:10 am to Kracka
I feel like death by shark would be quicker.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:12 am to tigerfan in bamaland
quote:
I feel like death by shark would be quicker.
It seems the OP set up a situation where you will die. If that is the intent then I would want the quickest way and I think that would be sharks as well.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:15 am to Kracka
The sharks may not even attack you but being in open water you’d be pretty screwed either way
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:15 am to Kracka
I am around sharks in the water all the time. A shark feeding frenzy would be a different scenario. They would finish you fast.
A big cat may drag you into a tree and such.
A big cat may drag you into a tree and such.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:17 am to Kracka
Like close to the shore or open water?
Close to the shore you might be able to stun the shark with a face hit and make it to shore, even if bit.
Open water alone, you are dead
Lions...I mean, the odds aren't great
Close to the shore you might be able to stun the shark with a face hit and make it to shore, even if bit.
Open water alone, you are dead
Lions...I mean, the odds aren't great
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:17 am to Kracka
I would use my jetpack to fly away.
Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.
Since we're dealing in hypotheticals.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:18 am to Kracka
Depends on the shark. Great Whites hunt by delivering a massive quick bite with razor teeth and then wait for their prey to bleed to death, which is generally quick. People who have survived attacks said they didn't feel any pain with that first bite, simply an impact and then they looked down and their leg was gone. But other sharks will swarm and take little bites until they are collectively brave enough to start a feeding frenzy. There are horror stories from World War II about torpedoed sailors in the water for long periods of time.
Lions generally kill by strangling their prey with a death clamp on the neck. I'm not sure if they would do that to a human since we arent their normal food source. Would they choke us out or just maul us to death? The reason these PBS shows that taught us about nature when we were kids always focused on lions is because they are the most "humane" killers. Most animals aren't so lucky as to be suffocated before turning into dinner. Most are swallowed alive or eaten when they are still conscious. Nature is cruel and horrific when you do a deep dive.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:21 am to Kracka
quote:
Stuck in waters with sharks or stuck in an open field with Lions?
Neither, this is the OT, so only one acceptable answer.
Breed of Peace
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:22 am to Kracka
I’ve watched a house cat play with a horribly injured but still living mouse. I don’t want to be the lions play toy.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:23 am to Kracka
While my chances are probably zero either way, if by some miracle I fended off the attack being on dry land afterwards would be preferable. You can focus on recovery instead of treading water.
For that matter, being on dry land during the attack as it’s my natural status would similarly be better. Sharks are designed to be in the water. I’m not.
For that matter, being on dry land during the attack as it’s my natural status would similarly be better. Sharks are designed to be in the water. I’m not.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:23 am to Kracka
Your chance of getting attacked by a shark are really low, 1 in 375 million, so I would take the sharks.
This post was edited on 2/13/24 at 11:24 am
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:24 am to Kracka
Grizzly attack because they can come out of nowhere and even if you saw them coming, it's not much you can do! Sharks would be bad too, but you might have some type of floating object to climb onto or a person to get you to safety.
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:25 am to Kracka
The worse situation would be the lions.
But I’d rather not be in either situation
But I’d rather not be in either situation
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:27 am to Kracka
Better question. How many baby sharks would it take to beat a lion in a hypothetical watering hole showdown?
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:29 am to Kracka
I want to say there’s a higher survival rate with shark attacks versus large cat attacks.
Maybe the sharks? I dunno man. Either way it’s likely over. You’ll probably drown with a missing limb and the lions will just drag you back to the rest of the pride.
Maybe the sharks? I dunno man. Either way it’s likely over. You’ll probably drown with a missing limb and the lions will just drag you back to the rest of the pride.
This post was edited on 2/13/24 at 11:31 am
Posted on 2/13/24 at 11:32 am to Kracka
Lionsharks .
A Scientifically created mutation .
And they have lasers on their fins.
Five seconds after I hit submit, "The Asylum" will start work on this very movie.
A Scientifically created mutation .
And they have lasers on their fins.
Five seconds after I hit submit, "The Asylum" will start work on this very movie.
Popular
Back to top

31












