Started By
Message

Very important point with the new OT Rule.

Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:57 pm
Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
22374 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:57 pm
Why not kick off after winning the overtime coin toss?

The point was made you have waaaaay more freedom to call plays differently knowing you have 4 downs.

Bad coaching decision.
This post was edited on 2/12/24 at 6:08 am
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7472 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:57 pm to
Terrible decision for sure
Posted by UltimaParadox
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
42495 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:57 pm to
So stupid taking the ball first
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
100200 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:58 pm to
As Romo said, maybe he thought his defense needed some rest.
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29454 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:59 pm to
It's basically like college the first 2 possessions. Why not kick it so you know how many points you need to extend the game?

If the possessions are switched then Niners are going for it on 4th and goal instead of kicked a FG.

And KC might be punting on 4th and 1 at midfield.

Nobody in college takes the ball in OT first but Niners did lolol
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15803 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 9:59 pm to
Absolutely horrible coaching decision.
Posted by TrueLefty
St. Louis County
Member since Oct 2017
15574 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Why not kick off after winning the overtime coin toss?

The point was made you have waaaaay more freedom to call plays differently knowing you have 4 downs.

Bad coaching by decision.

If the team score a touchdown game is over.
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
78468 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:01 pm to
Well if both teams had scored a td youd wish you had elected to receive, its very debatable either way
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
32645 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Why not kick off after winning the overtime coin toss?

The point was made you have waaaaay more freedom to call plays differently knowing you have 4 downs.

Bad coaching by decision.

And if both teams kick field goals or score TDs you give the other team the ball back to try to win with a FG.

Then people would call that a bad coaching decision.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
13107 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:04 pm to
With the college OT rules, going second is the clear choice.

With the old NFL sudden death, receiving the kick was the automatic choice.

With this new NFL playoff rule, there's pros and cons for each and thus no absolute clear cut choice.
Posted by boston vol
Lexington-Fayette, KY
Member since Sep 2015
5777 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Why not kick off after winning the overtime coin toss?

If it’s still tied after each team has had a possession, it’s sudden death. So you would obviously want the ball first.
Posted by TigerSooner
Member since Nov 2023
1271 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:05 pm to
He just did what the NFL told him to do.
Posted by LakeRunner
Ponchatoula
Member since Jun 2018
58 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:06 pm to
You have to take the ball. If both teams score a touchdown, the game becomes sudden death. You can’t just look at it from the first possession.
Posted by Red Solo Cup
Memphis, TN
Member since Sep 2012
469 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:09 pm to
N/m, missed the ot rule change.
This post was edited on 2/11/24 at 10:15 pm
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46950 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:10 pm to
If they come out of the first drives still tied, then it’s sudden death
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
44578 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

Why not kick off after winning the overtime coin toss? The point was made you have waaaaay more freedom to call plays differently knowing you have 4 downs. Bad coaching by decision.


Dumb take. Nobody is taking that risk in the superbowl.

The truth is the overtime rule is dumb. Sudden death was way more exciting.
This post was edited on 2/11/24 at 10:28 pm
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26577 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 11:13 pm to
This is complex and giving me a headache

I’m not sure what the right thing to do is

What do the analytics say??

My initial thinking was of course kick and know what you need to do…but it’s different than college where both teams are guaranteed a 2nd possession. So now I’m thinking the right move is to receive

Someone said it earlier…
College … no brainer… defense first
Old nfl overtime rules… no brainer… take the ball
New nfl OT rules… a little more complex

The good news is that a coin flip by itself doesn’t decide games anymore
This post was edited on 2/11/24 at 11:21 pm
Posted by rolltide32
Fort Payne, AL
Member since Nov 2013
6523 posts
Posted on 2/12/24 at 6:26 am to
Having the ball 2nd is advantageous in every possible scenario no matter what happens on the 2nd possession. A hypothetical third possession is irrelevant in the majority of considerations.

The bottom line is that the team that doesn't start with the ball is not guaranteed any chance to win the game with their offense.

The team that gets the ball second is guaranteed an opportunity to win the game with their offense unless they turn the ball over on special teams before the offense takes the field or their opponent takes the ball first, scores a touchdown, and converts a two point conversion and the odds of a coach actually making the decision to go for 2 after a touchdown in the opening possession of overtime is about as close to 0 as anything in sports.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram