re: I’m still irrationally angry about the targeting on Sam

quote:

---

He made valid points to show that Bama is not being favored. And you respond with this nonsense as though only the EXACT sequence in reverse could possibly disprove your foolishness.

---

He gave one example from one season in a thread about "targeting". I gave another example of targeting to counter his pass interference point.

Hilarious that LSU fans fall over themselves to make these insane points defending the obvious favoritism.

"There was ONE season where Bama didn't get preferential treatment therefore there is no favoritism!!"

LOLOLOLOLOL

quote:

---

Bama has been winning because they are better

---

Never said they weren't.

quote:

---

There is not one bad call that has cost us a game against Bama in my memory.

---

Funny, because there are dozens of threads from games from prior years where several calls per game cost LSU an opportunity. And that's just OUR games. That's not even scratching the surface of what other teams have dealt with too.

quote:

---

When Patrick Peterson intercepted that ball it was in a game that was thoroughly dominated by Bama's defense slapping our offense around. We were more likely to lose yardage than gain yardage on an ensuing drive.

---

Oh, I see. So even when Bama blatantly cheats, you are still going to say nothing would have come of it. Classic way to own both sides of an argument.

You aren't getting a check in the mail from Bama or the SEC for sticking up for them. Sorry.

quote:

---

Devin White's participation in the first half, when he was suspended, would have had about the same impact as his participation in the second half when Bama ran the ball down our throats.

---

Agreed. LSU was shut out that game. Again, that is NOT the point people are arguing at all. I noticed you ignored the point about the Bama player doing something way more egregious, and nothing happened to them. THAT is the point.

quote:

---

And if Dallas Turner was suspended for the rest of the game Bama still wins easily.

---

Again, not the point, but keep sucking Bama's dick.

quote:

---

We were down less than a touchdown at the time of the Peterson pick.

---

This was after they got away with spearing Jefferson with Tom Ritter staring right at it. That picture has been posted here multiple times. Many other terrible calls that game that went in their favor, yet LSU still hung with them despite the cheating.

Don't worry though, Penrod will own both sides of the argument and tell you that LSU wouldn't win anyway.

They want to believe so bad that it isn't corrupt, they are willing to shite on their own team to do it. It is hilarious to me.

Since Bama had penalties called on them last year, every year prior and every year forward is clean as a whistle! Just ignore what you are seeing and believe Penrod. If games were officiated fairly, LSU would lose anyway! He knows it!

quote:

---

They really need to implement a targeting 1 (no ejection) and targeting 2 (ejection). I feel like that’s such an easy fix for a rule that has a lot of grey area.

---

Yep, but can we really expect the ncaa to implement anything logical? Criminal frickin organization.

Since they’ve implemented the targeting rule, I’d say about 98% of targeting penalties + ejections are unintentional hits that shouldn’t not warrant an ejection. It’s terrible that they are ejecting players who are just trying to put out game film to make it to the next level.

quote:

---

At end of the day they did flag the Turner hit as roughing the passer

---

This actually made the decisions to not call it targeting on the field, then not to review it, then to defend it the week after exponentially worse. They threw the flag because there was contact to the head and neck not because it was late and not because he drove him to the ground under his body weight. This is what the head ref who threw the flag announced at the time.

Forcible contact to the head or neck of a defenseless player is targeting. The ref announced contact to the head or neck, the QB in a throwing motion is defenseless by definition. They literally said everything needed for targeting was there they just didn’t call it, didn’t review it, then the week after said it didn’t meet the definition which is simply not true. Then no one questions it. It’s pathetic.

quote:

---

I’m still ready to meet the white hat at Sonic.

---

I’d show up to throw hands at Sankey and the replay official in Birmingham.

frick the SEC.

No one mentions that the runner lowered their head and shoulders and it's the only reason Sams helmet hit his shoulder. Sam was going for his legs. A regular tackle

Post number you called to SEC office

quote:

---

It’s Monday morning and I’m still ready to meet the white hat at Sonic.

---

I'll meet you there

Despite what fans here think, it happens elsewhere too.

quote:

---

Clemson star running back Will Shipley has now taken questionable hits back-to-back weeks against NC State and Georgia Tech, with head coach Dabo Swinney sharing Sunday that the Tigers submit all the officiating calls it disagrees with to the ACC league office for review.

The one against NC State was bad, and it looked like clear targeting.

---

LINK