Started By
Message
locked post

Administration cancels remaining oil and gas leases in Alaska’s Arctic Refuge

Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:15 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29064 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:15 am
quote:

JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — In an aggressive move that angered Republicans, the Biden administration canceled the seven remaining oil and gas leases in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge on Wednesday, overturning sales held in the Trump administration’s waning days, and proposed stronger protections against development on vast swaths of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

The Department of Interior’s scrapping of the leases comes after the Biden administration disappointed environmental groups earlier this year by approving the Willow oil project in the petroleum reserve, a massive project by ConocoPhillips Alaska that could produce up to 180,000 barrels of oil a day on Alaska’s petroleum-rich North Slope.


quote:

Some critics who said the approval of Willow flew in the face of Biden’s pledges to address climate change lauded Wednesday’s announcement. But they said more could be done.


quote:

Alaska’s Republican governor condemned Biden’s moves and threatened to sue. And at least one Democratic lawmaker said the decision could hurt Indigenous communities in an isolated region where oil development is an important economic driver.

Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, who drew criticism for her role in the approval of the Willow project, said Wednesday that “no one will have rights to drill for oil in one of the most sensitive landscapes on earth.” However, a 2017 law mandates another lease sale by late 2024. Administration officials said they intend to comply with the law.


quote:

Alaska political leaders — including some Democrats — have long pushed to allow oil and gas drilling in the refuge in part because of its economic impact on Indigenous communities in an area with few other jobs. Many of those same voices pressed Biden to approve the Willow project for the same reason.

“I am deeply frustrated by the reversal of these leases in ANWR,” said U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola, a Democrat, using a common shorthand for the refuge. “This administration showed that it is capable of listening to Alaskans with the approval of the Willow Project, and it is some of those same Inupiat North Slope communities who are most impacted by this decision.


quote:

After taking office, Biden issued an executive order calling for a temporary moratorium on activities related to the leasing program and for the Interior secretary to review the program. Haaland later in 2021 ordered a new environmental review after concluding there were “multiple legal deficiencies” underlying the Trump-era leasing program. Haaland halted activities related to the leasing program pending the new analysis.


LINK
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40827 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:17 am to
We have West Texas, leave Alaska be is my opinion. It doesn’t even move the needle on production.
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
21020 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:21 am to
The Fed telling states what they can and can't do with their land for their people. But hey this might line their pockets with more "renewable" projects in the near future
Posted by Athis
I AM Charlie Kirk....
Member since Aug 2016
16291 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:22 am to
quote:

economic impact on Indigenous communities in an area with few other jobs.


So now they can go on public assistance?
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
55835 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:26 am to
quote:


So now they can go on public assistance?




$700 or claim to be illegals and get three times that
Posted by TygerTyger
Houston
Member since Oct 2010
11064 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:27 am to
We should be doing everything within our power to be an energy independent country. Like we were under Trump.

But frickstick Biden is setting us back on this must like he is on border security, trade, and every other thing his ilk touches.

Alaska in HUGE. People don't really understand how big it is. Especially liberal yankees from the east coast where you can drive for 2 hours and cross 3 state lines. The state is MASSIVE. And it's mostly just wilderness. acres and acres of wilderness. The technology and regulations used when drilling for oil cause the footprint to be microscopic compared to the size of the area. There's no DANGER TO THE ENVIRONMENT. That land rig is like a flea on a great dane's arse.

This post was edited on 9/7/23 at 8:28 am
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40827 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:31 am to
quote:

We should be doing everything within our power to be an energy independent country. Like we were under Trump.


And you think Alaska will make that happen? It costs O&G companies big money to operate in Alaska. Why would they make that investment when they can make way more revenue operating in West Texas, have better infrastructure , and refineries nearby?
This post was edited on 9/7/23 at 8:33 am
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42504 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:31 am to
Biden elects to protect the vast waste lands of Alaska before he protects our borders and the states of California. Arizona and Texas

Why is that?

This failure to guard our borders is impacting all of our major cities where we see crime and homelessness spiral out of control.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29064 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:42 am to
quote:

The Fed telling states what they can and can't do with their land for their people.


Well…the Dept of Interior owns the surface and mineral estates of these lands that are being talked about. Not the State of Alaska or individual/private entities.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86123 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:43 am to
Oil ? Who cares about the free flow of oil at market prices? We have unicorn farts!
Posted by ob1pimpbobi
College Station
Member since Jul 2022
3237 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:45 am to
Back to the stone ages!!!

We will make your ICE car obsolete no matter what!!!
Posted by PikesPeak
The Penalty Box
Member since Apr 2022
981 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

There's no DANGER TO THE ENVIRONMENT

Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
50363 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:48 am to
quote:

It costs O&G companies big money to operate in Alaska. Why would they make that investment when they can make way more revenue operating in West Texas


If it weren't economically viable for oil companies to work in Alaska, then there would be no need to cancel the leases. And there wouldn't be any rigs out there now.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40827 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:52 am to
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49562 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 9:08 am to
What is sad is this has zero to do with the environment and everything to do with crippling and ruining the American worker. Their goal is to create economic slavery
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29064 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Why would they make that investment when they can make way more revenue operating in West Texas, have better infrastructure , and refineries nearby?


I fully understand what you’re saying, but how long until those economic Tier 1 reserves are drilled and we start having to move towards economic Tier 2 more? Getting more aggressive drilling horizontals in Powder, Bakken and Alaska, while Permian is loaded more with secondary recovery?

If an operator is able to acquire a 10 year Fed lease today in Alaska, between planning, NEPA, permitting and infrastructure prep, they’re probably at least 4 years out from flowing the first barrel from the wellhead.
Posted by msap9020
Texas
Member since Feb 2015
2142 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 9:15 am to
quote:

And you think Alaska will make that happen? It costs O&G companies big money to operate in Alaska. Why would they make that investment when they can make way more revenue operating in West Texas, have better infrastructure , and refineries nearby?


2 comments in on this thread and I can tell you have zero idea what you are talking about.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40827 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 9:23 am to
quote:

fully understand what you’re saying, but how long until those economic Tier 1 reserves are drilled and we start having to move towards economic Tier 2 more? Getting more aggressive drilling horizontals in Powder, Bakken and Alaska, while Permian is loaded more with secondary recovery


I don’t disagree but I think there are other plays that are more attractive than Alaska. Alaska hasn’t been a major player for a long time now. It was historically operated by the big players and their focus is in other locations and I’m not sure a lease sale in Alaska would attract them.

Side note I hadn’t realized how much the rig count had dropped in the Permian since I left there. What’s driving the rig count down?
Posted by msap9020
Texas
Member since Feb 2015
2142 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 9:29 am to
quote:

If an operator is able to acquire a 10 year Fed lease today in Alaska, between planning, NEPA, permitting and infrastructure prep, they’re probably at least 4 years out from flowing the first barrel from the wellhead.


If acquired today, at a minimum double that 4 years.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 9:38 am to
[quote]We should be doing everything within our power to be an energy independent country. Like we were under Trump.
Energy Independent is a myth, we've never stopped importing. The U.S. produced 2.5% more energy in 2022 than we consumed. 

It wasn't due to the president though.
US Energy Independence Highest in 70 Years
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram