Started By
Message

re: Administration cancels remaining oil and gas leases in Alaska’s Arctic Refuge

Posted on 9/7/23 at 4:22 pm to
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
7328 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

My recollection is the problems started in 2015, again thanks to the Saudis. 2017-2018 there was hope that a Republican in the Whitehouse may do something to save the faltering industry. By 2019 all hope was lost.


It was the November 2014 landmark OPEC meeting where Saudi/OPEC decided to blow open the chokes and flood the market. Prices crashed from ~$105/bbl to $40/bbl in a matter of months

Saudis block OPEC output cut, sending oil price plunging



Also, to be fair, Wall Street/banks/private equity kept throwing money and some of these failing E+P companies (maintaining and even increasing US production all the way right up to COVID) even when prices were in the shitter. Lots of people lost lots of money


This post was edited on 9/7/23 at 4:28 pm
Posted by LSUtiger89
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
4700 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 5:07 pm to
Gas prices are set on futures. That’s why gas prices are not calculated in inflation. When future forecasted production is down gas prices go up.
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 5:43 pm to
Nothingburger. The Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority held these leases just in case major oil companies would find interest. Not one has and none ever intended, especially after all major banks announced they wouldn't finance o&g projects in the artic.
Posted by TigersnJeeps
FL Panhandle
Member since Jan 2021
2868 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:21 pm to
Curious - what should have Trump or the USG done?
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40879 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 2:18 am to
quote:

Gas prices are set on futures. That’s why gas prices are not calculated in inflation. When future forecasted production is down gas prices go up.


US oil production is at or near peak domestic historical production rates and will continue to tick up. Last week the US reached 12.8 million barrels per day production. The high was 13.1 million per day in Q1 2020, just before the pandemic. We will reach and exceed this number soon as the industry continues to recover.

Your gas futures will not be affected by the drop in the bucket oil production that comes out of Alaska which is currently 437k barrels per day. Alaska reached peak production in the 1980’s and has steadily declined since then. You are talking about making huge investments for little return in this market. Companies that are interested in making a profit won’t have a big interest in investing in Alaska which is whey they are not seeing much interest in their lease sales.
There may be a time in the future when Alaska becomes more attractive but that time is not right now.



Posted by jbird7
Central FL
Member since Jul 2020
5606 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 2:53 am to
Alaska is so big it has enough oil that the US wouldn’t even need to drill anywhere else.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40879 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 3:06 am to
quote:

You are wrong. Outside of early exploration programs, we build ice to build infrastructure.


So what is your proposal here? We build a bunch of roads and pads across the Alaskan landscape so O&G companies can drill year round? What’s wrong with using the natural ice that melts each spring and renews each winter? Do we really want to pock the Alaskan landscape with roads and permanent drill site pads? And before you accuse me again of not knowing what I’m talking about, I have over 25 years in the industry working all over the globe. I think that should at least partially qualify me to speak about it..

This post was edited on 9/8/23 at 3:20 am
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24874 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 3:38 am to
As democrats cheer.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29226 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 6:20 am to
I don’t know anything about drilling in Alaska, but would it be a bunch of vertical wells like your picture?

I was thinking even full development would be horizontals and likely with drill island and corridors for roads, pipelines and power lines to keep disturbance to a minimum.

But I’m just guessing here.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 6:31 am to
quote:

And you think Alaska will make that happen? It costs O&G companies big money to operate in Alaska. Why would they make that investment when they can make way more revenue operating in West Texas, have better infrastructure , and refineries nearby?


I don’t know, why don’t you ask all the O&G companies who invest billions in operating in Alaska?
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12703 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 6:41 am to
quote:

There's no DANGER TO THE ENVIRONMENT. That land rig is like a flea on a great dane's arse.


For a size comparison sake, a rig in Texas and Louisiana is like a Great Dane’s arse, while a rig in Alaska is like a flea on a bear’s arse. Alaska is much bigger. But I get your point.
This post was edited on 9/8/23 at 6:41 am
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
7328 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 9:15 am to
quote:

I was thinking even full development would be horizontals and likely with drill island and corridors for roads, pipelines and power lines to keep disturbance to a minimum


I am not 100% certain but pretty sure most (if not all) of Alaska's production is from conventional reservoirs. We are able to frac unconventional shale reservoirs in the lower 48 due to the infrastructure in place able to haul water/sand/material on a continuous basis
This post was edited on 9/8/23 at 9:18 am
Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
4105 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 9:19 am to
quote:

However, a 2017 law mandates another lease sale by late 2024. Administration officials said they intend to comply with the law.


I see it as just a political hat trick.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40879 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 9:29 am to
quote:

I am not 100% certain but pretty sure most (if not all) of Alaska's production is from conventional reservoirs. We are able to frac unconventional shale reservoirs in the lower 48 due to the infrastructure in place able to haul water/sand/material on a continuous basis


Yes they are all conventional plays which means it wouldn’t be factory drilling like in the Lower 48. I went back and looked at historical rig count and lease sales for Alaska. Since 1990 Alaska has averaged 10 active land rigs and they are currently at 9. Lease sale data is sort of interesting. Alaska went from 1984 to 1999 with open bids on tracts. That first sale in 1999 was the most active then it tapers off. Most of the companies bidding in those early sales are not even active in Alaska anymore. Anadarko was the most active for obvious reasons. ConocoPhillips has been the most consistent.

Year Companies Bids
1999 6 174
2002 5 69
2004 4 165
2006 3 87
2008 4 150
2010 1 5
2011 3 17
2012 2 14
2013 3 21
2014 2 2
2015 1 6
2016 4 31
2017 1 7
2018 3 16
2019 4 92

Yr Tracts Offered Tracts Receiving Bids
1999 UNK 174
2002 UNK 69
2004 UNK 165
2006 UNK 87
2008 UNK 150
2010 UNK 5
2011 UNK 17
2012 UNK 14
2013 380 22
2014 248 5
2015 143 6
2016 145 27
2017 900 7
2018 254 16
2019 350 92
2021 22 13

This post was edited on 9/8/23 at 9:48 am
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
19269 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 9:35 am to
Why not he’ll mortgages are damn near 8% let’s get oil prices even higher
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29226 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Yes they are all conventional plays which means it wouldn’t be factory drilling like in the Lower 48.


So does this mean 40 or 160 acre spacing verticals and not drill islands with corridors for exploration?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73638 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

The Fed telling states what they can and can't do with their land for their people.


Here’s how much land the feds own….



Which is absolutely absurd.
Posted by dhuck20
SCLSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
23211 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 1:31 pm to
quote:



US down 129
International up 92

Hooray for energy dependence!
Posted by msap9020
Texas
Member since Feb 2015
2151 posts
Posted on 9/11/23 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

So what is your proposal here?


I’m not “proposing” anything, I’m just stating a fact and countering what was stated earlier. It’s conventional drilling with pre-drilling and 100s of well heads per drill site. And if you re-read your question about the ice, really stop and think about it, the answer will probably come to you but I’m happy to assist. It’s cost prohibitive. Cost of supply numbers go to shite.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31529 posts
Posted on 9/11/23 at 8:47 pm to
Biden better be announcing loads of new nuclear power plants
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram