Started By
Message

re: The EBR signal synchronization saga Updated 3/6/24.. we made it!

Posted on 3/6/24 at 11:16 am to
Posted by uncommon sense
Member since Feb 2024
82 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 11:16 am to
quote:

I feel like alot of the lights in BR are done. Central is a different story, but we know the parish president doesn't care about that area.


Regardless of whatever you "feel" is the case with the traffic lights, they're definitely not synchronized. Just ride US61 northbound from LA73 to US190 anytime from 4PM on. Your "feelings" will change.

And the traffic in Central is a dumpster fire struck by a train wreck. There is not enough pavement to alleviate the bullshite there. And apparently the right slimy entities haven't been paid off enough for the 15+ year old planned/recommended infrastructure improvements there (Hooper, Sullivan, & Hooper bridge to LP) to be started and/or completed.

But we have blinking yellow arrows. And a N Sherwood extension to Joor, north of Greenwell Springs.
Posted by Wabbit7
Member since Aug 2018
1136 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 12:04 pm to
The Sullivan widening project should have led to multiple people being fired.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17620 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

And a N Sherwood extension to Joor, north of Greenwell Springs. ?


It was the only thing Broome could think of to keep the value of her house from going down any further.
Posted by uncommon sense
Member since Feb 2024
82 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 3:10 pm to
Where is Broome's house?
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78068 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 3:13 pm to
Pretty soon they will announce a plan to have AI manage the lights by 2035.
Posted by whoa
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
4624 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:00 pm to
If the project is complete, traffic will surely be improved now right?
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36203 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

If the project is complete, traffic will surely be improved now right?


Per the Baton Rouge Business Report,
quote:

The connectivity doesn’t mean drivers will breeze through an uninterrupted series of green lights, but they should be able to predict—and plan for—how long a trip will take.


So the answer is No.
Posted by SlackMaster
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
2661 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

they should be able to predict—and plan for—how long a trip will take.

Well, this may be somewhat true. I predict that I'll catch every light red but maybe one when I drive down Stanford/Acadian.
This post was edited on 3/6/24 at 4:33 pm
Posted by whoa
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
4624 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:09 pm to
Can anyone find a list of lights that were supposed to be synchronized? I looked on the movebr website but couldn’t find a detailed list.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36203 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Well, this may be somewhat true. I predict that I'll catch every light red but maybe one when I drive down Stanford/Acadian.


I could do all that before synchronization. If all this technology doesn’t speed up traffic then why do it?
Posted by whoa
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
4624 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:14 pm to
LINK
Found this link from 2020 showing which lights have been complete and I can confirm that some of these are bullshite. That little stretch of Burbank from Parker to Jennifer Jean is most definitely not synchronized.
Posted by SlackMaster
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
2661 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

I could do all that before synchronization. If all this technology doesn’t speed up traffic then why do it?
Exactly. My comment was meant to be sarcastic.
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43305 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

How is it even possible that something like this takes more than a few months to accomplish?



I'm not saying the project hasn't taken way too long, but you might be underestimating how long something like this can take by asking if it should only take a few months. That's a LOT of lights they have to get connectivity to, test, and put into production. Though, maybe I'm giving them too much credit thinking they'd test a light out before putting it into production.
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43305 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

Well, this may be somewhat true. I predict that I'll catch every light red but maybe one when I drive down Stanford/Acadian.



This is my life's curse. My kids even ask me why i catch every red light. Being in BR amplifies this curse
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25811 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:35 pm to
well they suck at syncrhonization.


I know that if i turn right on Siegen from Industriplex, and make a quick u-turn on Siegen and head towards the interstate, i'll hit all the green lights on Siegen and hop on I-10 West in less than a minute.
I know if i sit at that light on Industriplex waiting for it to turn green for me to turn left on Siegen, i will have to sit at the next red light, and then i'll have to sit at the next red light at the RaceTrac before i get on the interstate.

I know if i turn right onto Jefferson from Lobdell, and quickly make a uturn to head east on jefferson, I won't have to sit at a red light for over a minute while hardly anyone goes on the green lights, and i'll hit the next green light at corporate, whereas if i waited on Lobdell for the light to turn green for me to turn left onto Jefferson, it will take forever, and then I'll have to wait again at the corporate light.


The turning lane light on Airline onto Antioch takes so long that I can go straight on airline, go almost all the way to highland where there's a turnaround right before the light (which is 0.4 miles), make a uturn and head to the Rouses parking lot, park my car and start walking into Rouses before the light to turn left will turn green at Airline/Antioch.




I'm not going to complain too much about the light at Burbank and Gardere b/c i'd chalk that one up to stupid fricking drivers more than than the stupid fricking light, even though the light is fricking stupid.



There are plenty more examples of lights in this town staying red for far too long while no one is coming in the other direction, and it's faster to just go the opposite direction and uturn it to go in the direction you are wanting to go. And it's not even dangerous to make the uturn b/c no one is coming despite the green light. And you don't have to worry about illegal uturns b/c there are no cops on the streets in the is town, which is why i run red lights every single day.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33955 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

The Sullivan widening project should have led to multiple people being fired.


It did I'm pretty sure. I know work stopped because they kept getting ground water higher than the water table. Sounded like they encountered a natural spring and had no idea what to do about it.
Posted by LSULaw2009
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2008
1696 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

I’ve been asking for one thing for a decade now: a no-left-turn onto Burbank from East Boyd



Highland running through LSU either needs green arrow protected lefts or no left turns allowed (at least during a time period of say 7am -7pm).

And the left turns on Perkins between Perkins on/off ramp and college/Lee need major work. Some will skip a left arrow for multiple light cycles backing up turning lanes and congesting traffic.

It also doesn't help the lights are timed to often have turns or forward progress blocked by traffic not clearing intersection from side streets and prior light cycles.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150867 posts
Posted on 3/6/24 at 6:03 pm to
I live around Staring and Burbank and I work downtown. So I drive Burbank to Nicholson to downtown every morning and afternoon.

And my drive is noticeably longer in the mornings now because the lights aren’t synchronized. The two lights on campus on Nicholson are maddening sometimes. You either hit them both green or you hit one red then the next one red. And at the second one (at Bernie Moore) you have to wait forever for not only the side street (North Stadium) but also the opposite turn lane, whether there are any cars there or not.

That’s what pisses me off the most I think. The stupid arse blinking then signals that you have to wait on whether there are cars theming or not.

And the lights on Burbank around the Mellow Mushroom area are just plain stupid these days.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17620 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

 I know work stopped because they kept getting ground water higher than the water table. Sounded like they encountered a natural spring and had no idea what to do about it.


Rumor is that when the drainage was installed in the 50s, it was installed backwards. I don't know what that means or entails, but apparently it's a big issue to fix, but wasn't a big issue for 70 years while the city went from a one horse town to what it is now.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65895 posts
Posted on 3/9/24 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

MOVEBR
Misspelled “MOVEFROMBR”.

A much better idea.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram