- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/28/23 at 7:44 pm to stout
quote:
We determined that in 2018, atmospheric anthropogenic fossil CO2 represented 23% of the total emissions since 1750 with the remaining 77% in the exchange reservoirs. Our results show that the percentage of the total CO2 due to the use of fossil fuels from 1750 to 2018 increased from 0% in 1750 to 12% in 2018, much too low to be the cause of global warming.
Do what now?
Posted on 5/28/23 at 7:57 pm to stout
I’m gonna go out on a limb and say it is most definitely not the sun.
Posted on 5/28/23 at 8:00 pm to stout
We’ve known for well over a decade now that there’s no consensus proof of human caused global warming. It’s impossible to completely separate it from the natural changes of the Earth. Nice to see more studies adding hard evidence
Posted on 5/28/23 at 8:48 pm to stout
quote:
Our results show that the percentage of the total CO2 due to the use of fossil fuels from 1750 to 2018 increased from 0% in 1750 to 12% in 2018, much too low to be the cause of global warming.
All seems logical, until this last statement that 12% is much too low to be the cause of global warming. Where the hell does THAT come from? There is nothing in there that substantiates this statement. That’s where the spin starts, and that’s how you recognize propaganda.
Posted on 5/28/23 at 8:51 pm to Upperdecker
quote:
We’ve known for well over a decade now that there’s no consensus proof of human caused global warming. It’s impossible to completely separate it from the natural changes of the Earth. Nice to see more studies adding hard evidence
While I agree with most of what you wrote, this study does NOT add evidence to back up your statements; it adds data. It’s interesting that carbon forcing is the result of a 12% increase in CO2, but that does not quantify anything else.
If they could show that the models that alarmists rely upon show more than 12% then they would have evidence and a case. But they don’t show that.
Posted on 5/28/23 at 8:54 pm to stout
Now how is John Kerry going to get that new yacht if you keep peddling this truth bullshite?
Posted on 5/28/23 at 9:14 pm to Joshjrn
So a little bit of facts. More than half of the known time the world has existed the atmosphere had such high CO2 levels humans could not survive. The entire planet was sub tropical or tropical, both poles were swamps/marsh.
The world has been warming and cooling since the beginning of time, it will continue long after humans are gone.
Human caused climate change is a complete bs money and power grab by POS who need to be publicly lynched.
The world has been warming and cooling since the beginning of time, it will continue long after humans are gone.
Human caused climate change is a complete bs money and power grab by POS who need to be publicly lynched.
This post was edited on 5/28/23 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 5/28/23 at 9:22 pm to GREENHEAD22
If global warming is truly happening, and it is going to put all of the coastal areas under water, why do rich assholes like the Obamas keep buying homes and land there?
Posted on 5/28/23 at 9:27 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Where do you get the constant stream of news articles that fit what you’re looking for? This study is over a year old, so did it recently cross the same news wire as all of your COVID vaccine articles, or are they separate subscriptions?
Aren't you the guy who wants to set a global cap on atmospheric CO2 at a level dangerously close to killing off all plant life?
Posted on 5/28/23 at 9:40 pm to stout
Ima go out on a limb and say zero people here know what the hell that study(?) means or if they come to any conclusion. In fact, I'm not sure anyone in the world knows what it is trying to convey.
Posted on 5/28/23 at 9:45 pm to stout
Lololololololol
Not like there haven't been people screaming about this for decades.
But, muh computer models...
fricktardia
Not like there haven't been people screaming about this for decades.
But, muh computer models...
fricktardia
Posted on 5/28/23 at 9:50 pm to GREENHEAD22
quote:
So a little bit of facts. More than half of the known time the world has existed the atmosphere had such high CO2 levels humans could not survive. The entire planet was sub tropical or tropical, both poles were swamps/marsh.
The world has been warming and cooling since the beginning of time, it will continue long after humans are gone.
It's the rate of change that makes this time different. Is there a cost/benefit advantage in attempting to mitigate the rate?
Personally I see it as a serious money-making opportunity and have some speculative bets that could pay off very big in the next 7-10 years but won't do too much damage to my portfolio if they don't.
Posted on 5/28/23 at 9:52 pm to stout
Two comments:
1)Pretty out of context journal it was published in.
2) Seriously? The paper cites Wikipedia in its background info.
I want it to be hard science but those two aren’t good looks in professionalism. I can ignore the first as just rigid dogma not allowing things outside the groupthink being published…..but Wikipedia?
1)Pretty out of context journal it was published in.
2) Seriously? The paper cites Wikipedia in its background info.
I want it to be hard science but those two aren’t good looks in professionalism. I can ignore the first as just rigid dogma not allowing things outside the groupthink being published…..but Wikipedia?
This post was edited on 5/28/23 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 5/28/23 at 10:06 pm to stout
Tell Jane Fonda. It’s racist I tell you.
Posted on 5/28/23 at 10:58 pm to GREENHEAD22
quote:So a little bit of context to your facts, you forgot to mention that the rate of change in CO2 levels and global temperatures in modern times is on the order of 1,000 times faster than throughout the planet's history.
So a little bit of facts. More than half of the known time the world has existed the atmosphere had such high CO2 levels humans could not survive. The entire planet was sub tropical or tropical, both poles were swamps/marsh.
The world has been warming and cooling since the beginning of time, it will continue long after humans are gone.
Posted on 5/28/23 at 11:09 pm to keakar
quote:billions, with a 'B'?
al gore still made billions off the climate scam
Posted on 5/28/23 at 11:20 pm to UltimaParadox
quote:
On the same website multiple comments and studies debunking this dude... Right under the study
Wow, people with no known credentials debonk him, right under the study?
That's just so powerful man!!!!!!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News