re: There is something "off" about this Fox/Dominion thing

Fox has the deepest pockets of the defendants or potential defendants listed in your post. Plaintiff probably determined that it was best to line them up first to hopefully set the dominant “tone,” and furthermore to perhaps deny Fox a blueprint of their litigation strategy by having lined up a “smaller” fish first. The end result is that now the plaintiff can use this settlement to bully the others into settling because psychologically, if the big dog Fox with its endless capabilities to fight has determined that to be a bad idea, then what should the smaller fish think??

As for why Fox would choose to settle in the first place: Very generally speaking, Fox determined that due to the unfavorable sentiment towards this particular topic, that if they did elect to take it all the way to trial, the deck may well be stacked against them just enough in terms of pretrial rulings as well as concern as to whether a decent jury was possible at all - for those reasons they perhaps became fully convinced that they’d not get a truly fair trial, and the damage award from losing what might be fairly accurately described as a roll of the dice would greatly overshadow the settlement amount.

Just speculatin’ and spitballin’.

They got sued and paid the money obviously they did it.

I've heard all 3 say the election was stolen. Just running with the bullshite narrative trump had his people come up with the night he lost.

All that evidence they talked about?? Didn't exist.

Tucker did call out Powell at one point on air. I remember that but he didn't like the response he got from his fans.

quote:

---

Here is the complaint LINK

Statements begin on p. 117 (130 of pdf)

---

It would seem something so obviously (and apparently massively) damaging to a company’s reputation would be much easier to clearly explain and articulate.

quote:

---

It would seem something so obviously (and apparently massively) damaging to a company’s reputation would be much easier to clearly explain and articulate.

---

Which items do you need further articulated? If you wish to read the shorter version of the complained upon statements, p. 5 of the complaint has the TOC which articulates the following:

Dominion Did Not Commit Election Fraud by Rigging the 2020 Presidential Election.

Dominion's Software and Algorithms Did Not Manipulate Vote Counts in the 2020 Presidential Election.

Dominion Is Not Owned by a Company Founded in Venezuela to Rig Elections for the Dictator Hugo Chavez

Dominion Did Not Pay Kickbacks to Government Officials Who Used Its Machines in the 2020 Presidential Election.

Question: how much stock does Paul Ryan own in Dominion?

quote:

---

It was relentless
Tucker
Rudy
Sydney
Dobbs
Maria
Sean

---

You do understand that naming anchors is not proof of something happening. Here, let me show you something:

Ferrari
Lamborghini
Porsche
Corvette

Doesn't mean that I was speeding in my car.

quote:

---

These are only the ones where your guys lose, right?

---

Have you had any luck providing the slanderous quote from one Fox anchor?

If Fox News was in on the steal, it would make a lot of sense to “agree” to a settlement. This would instantly stop all talks of fraud as well as devalue any future claims.

Here’s 20 of them.. from CNN

LINK