Started By
Message
locked post

Dollar General Employee Charged With Manslaughter After Killing Armed Robber in LA

Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:45 am
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
3668 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:45 am
Dollar General Employee Charged With Manslaughter After Killing Armed Robber, Says 6th Time In 5 Months Store Was Robbed


According to local police, Rafus Anderson was working at the downtown Monroe location when the robbery took place. Per Fox 5 Vegas, when the thief took the money from the register and attempted to leave the store, the employee pulled out a gun and fired more than one shot in his direction. The suspect was hit along with an innocent bystander who was shopping at the time.
LINK
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29631 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:46 am to
Looks like that robber won't be a problem anymore.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464975 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:47 am to
If you are ever in a position to rely on self defense, it's not a good idea to shoot the aggressor in the back while he/she flees.

It doesn't automatically screw you, but you can get convicted. Remember that incident in Oklahoma (IIRC) a few years ago?
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109456 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Per Fox 5 Vegas,


Why are we getting a Las Vegas station's news story for this?
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George, LA
Member since Aug 2004
80290 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:50 am to
Should have aimed for the knees
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29631 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:51 am to
quote:

If you are ever in a position to rely on self defense, it's not a good idea to shoot the aggressor in the back while he/she flees.



That's a fact.

The heat of a moment is hard to always know how to respond in, but you do need to have major calculations going on if you want to be a responsible gun owner. Now, I don't agree that you should get charged. Personally, if you present an armed threat I don't care if you're running away. That is a live session of threat, and it's fair game. but legally, you are very right.
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
21628 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Remember that incident in Oklahoma (IIRC) a few years ago?


That dude got rung up because he shot a robber in the head, completely incapacitating (but not killing) the perp. He then went and retrieved an additional handgun and executed the guy.

I'd say that's a bit different.
Posted by AubieinNC2009
Mountain NC
Member since Dec 2018
7038 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:51 am to
yeah not good to shoot in the back and aim must have been bad since he hit a bystander too.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464975 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:53 am to
quote:

I'd say that's a bit different.

Sure but the general point remains. Once the immediate threat of the aggressor is over, what you can do in response decreases a great deal.

The available "defense" options in the example in OK were much more limited than the story in OP.
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
28960 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:56 am to
Defense counsel will successfully argue that the clerk was in a traumatic state of shock and still felt threatened for his life.

POS is dead so move on Monroe DA.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Dollar General Employee Charged With Manslaughter After Killing Armed Robber
Prediction: This thread will devolve into name-calling by (i) those who think this is just fine because a criminal is dead and against (ii) those who largely-agree but who also understand the applicable law.
Posted by Barneyrb
NELA
Member since May 2016
6883 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 9:21 am to
Even though the deceased was committing a crime, the survivors will be suing DG and they will win a lot of money. I'm guessing somewhere north of a million.
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
19424 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Even though the deceased was committing a crime, the survivors will be suing DG and they will win a lot of money. I'm guessing somewhere north of a million.
either that or DG will build a store in their front yard
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
26026 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 9:25 am to
It's a shame that you can't shoot somebody that's stealing your property.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
68460 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 9:25 am to
quote:

If you are ever in a position to rely on self defense, it's not a good idea to shoot the aggressor in the back while he/she flees.

Yeah bc it's no longer a defensive shooting
Posted by sonuvapitcher
Member since Aug 2008
2131 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 9:26 am to
It is not beyond the realm of possibility that the armed robber could stop, turn around and shoot somebody as he’s going out the door.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
68460 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 9:28 am to
Let me know how that defense plays out in court
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
43859 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 9:29 am to
quote:

If you are ever in a position to rely on self defense, it's not a good idea to shoot the aggressor in the back while he/she flees.




Armed robbery should supersede shooting someone in the back. If you stick a gun in someone's face and steal their money, a potential outcome of that could be getting shot in the back when you turn to leave. If the clerk had attempted to draw their weapon while the robber was facing them, they could have been shot.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
81704 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Once the immediate threat of the aggressor is over
Who determines when that is, though?

Who's to say he doesn't come back in to eliminate witnesses?

Apparently fleeing isn't necessarily fleeing.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 9:30 am to
quote:

It's a shame that you can't shoot somebody that's stealing your property.
The underlying legal presumption is that a human life is worth more than "stuff."

That validity of that presumption is certainly subject to reasonable debate.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram