- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3 terrible calls last night by the refs
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:01 am to Earnest_P
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:01 am to Earnest_P
quote:
He didn’t miss. I’m not saying it was targeting, but it was certainly a defensive player hitting a sliding QB, and thats always a flag, even if he didn’t fully hit him.
I was about a 6 pack in at that point, but when he “dove over” Daniels didn’t he also extend his arms to get a shot in the head with his forearms, or am I misremembering?
If he did, that would show intent, adding in the launch, and should have been a 15 yard penalty. Don’t know the targeting rule that well to know if he should have been ejected.
0
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:02 am to AlxTgr
I don't agree at all with #1, he still did the act of launching at a player who gave himself up.
If anything they need to look at this rule and change it again. Call it Targeting 1 and 2, like how basketball has flagrant 1 and 2. Targeting 1, you get penalized but not ejected. Targeting 2, immediately ejected and penalized.
If anything they need to look at this rule and change it again. Call it Targeting 1 and 2, like how basketball has flagrant 1 and 2. Targeting 1, you get penalized but not ejected. Targeting 2, immediately ejected and penalized.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:03 am to Merchant Tiger
quote:
2. The out of bounds touching non fumble recover. What kinda BS is that… the lsu player had 2 hands on the ball. The out of bounds player then knocked it from his hand.
How does a player that lost possession of the ball and goes out of bounds become the determining factor by merely touching the ball?
Take away the 3 they got on that drive and there is no OT
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:04 am to Merchant Tiger
what about the first down when the guy was behind by at least 2 yards
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:04 am to sicboy
quote:
Go look it up. It's what they based the call on and the only reason they reviewed it.
It's a dumb rule, but they got it right.
So you have no idea what the rule actually says but you are able to definitively say they got it right?
You have no idea if they got it right honestly and you are gullible AF obviously.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:04 am to Merchant Tiger
The missed holding call on #54 against Perkins on the long TD pass was the worst call of the game. Blatant, and it affected the outcome quite a bit.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:05 am to Merchant Tiger
Refs were terrible, thankfully our team showed serious heart and didn’t let it rattle them
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:08 am to TigerLunatik
quote:I don't even think it was tipped. The ball's trajectory or spin didn't change one bit. Therefore, although I think the ball missed our guy's hand by a millimeter, there wasn't a tip - at least not evidence of a tip.
and the ball was barely tipped
And let's all please stop with this childish bashing of the refs.
The fumble / out of bounds play was bizarre, but apparently that's the rule. Our guy didn't have possession (and no, two hands on the ball doesn't equal possession - ask any receiver that has a pass go through his hands). The TV official guy called that one immediately.
And holding? Hell, the refs could call holding on every single play - on either team.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:08 am to Merchant Tiger
It just seems stupid that the out of bounds player doesn't need to possess the ball-- he just had to touch the ball while Books had both hands on it.
That rule doesn't make sense.
That rule doesn't make sense.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:08 am to Merchant Tiger
Bama was spotted 9 points last night on the made up rule and the hold on Perkins on the long TD.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:10 am to gar90
State the rule that says a player has to be in possession of the ball for X seconds to have possession of a fumble!
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:11 am to extremetigerfanatic
quote:
Taylor blocked in the back on Daniels OT run.
That's never ever called block in the back.
He was continuously engaged with the defender and he turned around.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:14 am to Prominentwon
Perkins was actually being held by his face mask and jersey. It was bad. They held all night long
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:17 am to BZ504
quote:ok - now go back and watch the game from a Bama fan's perspective and tell me how many bad calls went against the Tide.
Bama was spotted 9 points last night on the made up rule and the hold on Perkins on the long TD.
This constant bashing of refs is infantile. Every play, there are 22 guys flying around the field. Bad / missed calls happen -- to BOTH TEAMS.
Thankfully, we now have replay to correct some of the calls, but missed calls happen -- to every team, in every game, in every sport.
Stop the whining. It's childish.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:21 am to atltiger6487
Clearly the finger of the glove moved back. Grazing is still contact that may not necessarily offset trajectory.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:22 am to atltiger6487
quote:
Therefore, although I think the ball missed our guy's hand by a millimeter, there wasn't a tip - at least not evidence of a tip.
Based on his immediate reaction, it hit his finger, even if by a mm. Also, on the replay from behind Young, you see his finger bent back if you don’t zoom in. If you zoom in, it’s too blurry to make out the finger movement
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:26 am to sicboy
quote:
Go look it up.
So you can NOT site the rule..thanks.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:27 am to Weekend Warrior79
Hard to beat Bama and the refs but we did so F Bana!
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:27 am to Merchant Tiger
quote:
The non targeting call where the players blatantly launches at Daniels after he gave him self up
Don’t be such a weenie.
If we’d gotten called for that non contact we would be ballistic.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 8:29 am to Weekend Warrior79
The hold on Perkins was unbelievable on the long TD pass…it was as blatant as can be and directly stopped a sack.
The block in the back was not a foul because the defender turned after being engaged…that is not called.
The block in the back was not a foul because the defender turned after being engaged…that is not called.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News