- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3 terrible calls last night by the refs
Posted on 11/6/22 at 10:57 am to TigerLunatik
Posted on 11/6/22 at 10:57 am to TigerLunatik
quote:
We won the fricking game and you're still crying about the refs. Jesus Christ.
Yes the retards in full force. Some love misery. Same morons that wanted BK fired a few weeks ago and Daniel’s benched.
1
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:00 am to DJFord
quote:
You could see the tip of the players glove bend back when he touched it.
You can see his middle finger move when it touched the ball, but it was not inconclusive. I can forgive that one, because it wasn't called on the field.
The fumble was an atrocious S/REC review that we are all familiar with
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:01 am to TheWalrus
quote:So if I shoot at you with a pistol, but I miss you, no harm no foul?
I was fine with 1
No attempted murder charge?
Yes, he mostly missed him, but only because Daniel’s completely laid out. If he hadn’t, the dude would have taken his head off. On the replay, he actually did make contact with Daniel’s face mask with his forearm.
This post was edited on 11/6/22 at 11:03 am
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:01 am to CDawson
quote:
Yes the retards in full force. Some love misery. Same morons that wanted BK fired a few weeks ago and Daniel’s benched.
Why are you all fired up like Captain Angrodouche after a good win?
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:04 am to Merchant Tiger
1 and 2 need to be sent to the SEC office and LSU needs to let it be known that they sent them in.
1. The bama player launched and still got a piece of Daniels. It doesn’t matter if he knocked him out or not. We’ve been over this 1 million times and by the rule book that was targeting.
2. The LSU player had possession of the ball. That call is on par with the Patrick Peterson call.
3. It looked like his finger bent back a little but the ball trajectory didn’t change at all. Don’t think you could overturn whatever the call was on the field one way or another.
1. The bama player launched and still got a piece of Daniels. It doesn’t matter if he knocked him out or not. We’ve been over this 1 million times and by the rule book that was targeting.
2. The LSU player had possession of the ball. That call is on par with the Patrick Peterson call.
3. It looked like his finger bent back a little but the ball trajectory didn’t change at all. Don’t think you could overturn whatever the call was on the field one way or another.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:05 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
Agreed. That should have still been a penalty. The guy wasn't even close, Daniels was already into his slide when he launched himself and he launched himself low. The fact that he didn't hit him should have no bearing on that call. It's a bullshite dangerous play.
Everyone keeps saying that he didn't hit Daniels but the fact is he just didn't hit him that hard and not in the manner that he tried to but he did hit him. At the very least, it should have been the personal foul to give a message.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:05 am to Geauxldilocks
quote:
If Bama goes up 22-17,
10000000%. People keep saying that would have been a game winner. Sure, all things equal, it would've. But them going up by 5 likely means we're going for two (which, we could've missed and their FG is still a winner, but, of course, if we make it, we're up by 3 again.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:06 am to T
quote:
3. It looked like his finger bent back a little but the ball trajectory didn’t change at all. Don’t think you could overturn whatever the call was on the field one way or another.
Do me a favor. Stick your hand out and bend it back as far as you can without using your other hand or fingers. Now tell me if you think it can't be overturned, because his finger moving like that isn't caused by him moving it on his own, and there's only one thing that moved it
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:08 am to Merchant Tiger
There was also a major hold on Gaye during Bryce’s scramble and TD toss in the 4Q
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:09 am to gar90
can you or someone else provide the text of this rule? I would like it see it.
I do not think I have ever seen it applied, if, in fact, it covers this type of play.
I do not think I have ever seen it applied, if, in fact, it covers this type of play.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:12 am to SlimTigerSlap
2 needs to be changed ASAP
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:14 am to Old Character
The INTENT was there, he just simply didn't land the punch. That is as blatant a violation of targeting as there is.
Sometimes, the head gets hit and it was just a happened stance, he launched with the intention of a knockout blow after he gave himself up.
Sometimes, the head gets hit and it was just a happened stance, he launched with the intention of a knockout blow after he gave himself up.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:14 am to Jester
quote:
Why are you all fired up like Captain Angrodouche after a good win?
Fired up about the win is a good thing. Crying like a kindergarten girl about a call after a huge win is on a different level of stupid.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:19 am to CDawson
quote:
Fired up about the win is a good thing. Crying like a kindergarten girl about a call after a huge win is on a different level of stupid
Then move the frick along and stop worrying about what other people are annoyed about. Be your own man, not dependent on the emotions of other people.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:20 am to Juan Betanzos
quote:
There was also a major hold on Gaye during Bryce’s scramble and TD toss in the 4Q
The blatant hold on that one was against Perkins. That may be the one you're talking about
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:29 am to TigerCoon
.
This post was edited on 11/6/22 at 11:49 am
Posted on 11/6/22 at 12:16 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Yeah, I don't understand how anyone can call this a bad call. Call it a bad rule all you want.
Brooks was in control of the ball and down prior to the Bama player touching it. The fact that the Bama player knocked it out of his hands is rather irrelevant (falls into the same category as "ground can't cause a fumble". Once the ball is down, it is down).
The refs did not show conclusive proof that Brooks was not in possession of the ball, which is supposed to be the standard for overturning the call. In fact, the ball was not moving in Brooks' hand.
Bad call, IMHO.
GEAUX TIGERS
Posted on 11/6/22 at 12:24 pm to nitwit
quote:
can you or someone else provide the text of this rule? I would like it see it. I do not think I have ever seen it applied, if, in fact, it covers this type of play.
I did earlier in the thread
Posted on 11/6/22 at 12:26 pm to Fonzarelli
quote:
10000000%. People keep saying that would have been a game winner. Sure, all things equal, it would've. But them going up by 5 likely means we're going for two (which, we could've missed and their FG is still a winner, but, of course, if we make it, we're up by 3 again.
Yeah it’s a stupid angle. We scored every time we had to, game would have changed a lot earlier if they went for one on first PAT.
Posted on 11/6/22 at 12:30 pm to Juan Betanzos
quote:
There was also a major hold on Gaye during Bryce’s scramble and TD toss in the 4Q
Didn’t see that but the bammer on Perkins pulled him down by his jersey in one hand and facemask in the other.
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News